404 Media

2025-11-12 15:08:42

Major Porn Studios Join Forces to Establish Industry ‘Code of Conduct’

Six of the biggest porn studios in the world, including industry giant and Pornhub parent company Ayl o, announced Wednesday they have formed a first-of-its-kind coalition called the Adult Studio Alliance (ASA). The alliance’s purpose is to “contribute to a safe, healthy, dignified, and respectful adult industry for performers,” the ASA told 404 Media.

“This alliance is intended to unite professionals creating adult content (from studios to crews to performers) under a common set of values and guidelines. In sharing our common standards, we hope to contribute to a safe, healthy, dignified, and respectful adult industry for performers,” a spokesperson for ASA told 404 Media in an email. “As a diverse group of studios producing a large volume and variety of adult content, we believe it’s key to promote best practices on all our scenes. We all come from different studios, but we share the belief that all performers are entitled to comfort and safety on set.”

The founding members include Aylo, Dorcel, ERIKALUST, Gamma Entertainment, Mile High Media and Ricky’s Room. Aylo owns some of the biggest platforms and porn studios in the industry, including Brazzers, Reality Kings, Digital Playground and more.

In a press release Wednesday, the ASA said its primary mission is “to publish and adhere to a comprehensive Code of Conduct, providing a structured framework for directors, producers, and talent to ensure the safest possible sets and consistent industry best practices.” The ASA’s code of conduct addresses performers’ rights to consent to the types of scenes they’ll shoot, their scene partners including extras, sexual acts, script and creative documents, the length of the shoot day, location, remuneration and conditions, and any other rights involved in their agreement with the studio.

The founding studios say they have signed agreements to adhere to the ASA’s code of conduct, but the ASA “encourages all studios, members or not, to adopt and adhere to these guidelines to foster a safer, more respectful, and more professional adult industry,” the spokesperson said.

“All performers have the right to be treated with professional respect and dignity, free from harassment of any kind,” the code states. “They should be: Able to refuse, at any time, any act, even if previously agreed upon; Able to visually confirm their partner’s STI test status on set before any sexual performance; Provided water, snacks, meals, breaks, and privacy as needed; Provided all necessary sexual health and hygienic materials needed to perform; Paid their agreed-upon rate for the date of production.”

The code also outlines rights and expectations for third-party producers and crew members, including verifying performers’ ages, ensuring an environment “free of harassment of any kind (mental, physical or sexual),” and “never using their influence or access to the studio to pressure performers or promise work.” Agencies and talent agents are also addressed in the code of conduct: “Agencies should represent and protect performers, inform them very clearly of the specific requirements of pornographic performances,” the code states. “They must inform performers of their rights and duties and legitimate expectations, with no expectation of sexual contact with agency staff, reasonably limited contract terms (within industry standard range of 1 year), and no punitive buyouts for performers who choose to leave the agency.”

A need for more autonomy over one’s working conditions spurred the rise of the independent adult content creator economy in the last 10 years, as more performers moved away from studio work—which often dictates workers’ hours, physical location, and ownership rights to their performances, and can be sporadic—to models like webcamming and subscription platforms like OnlyFans. Porn is legal in the U.S. but is still a heavily stigmatized career, and performers have reported that legislation like 2018’s Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act have made their livelihoods more precarious, even when working with studios.

In 2020, as Hollywood reckoned with allegations of abuse and coercion against the most powerful people in the entertainment industry, multiple performers came forward with their own stories of physical and mental abuse on-set. The power dynamic present in mainstream acting careers also exists in porn, with the added stigma of sex work: adult performers, like mainstream entertainment professionals or many other industries, might feel like they risk being ostracized within their industry for speaking out about mistreatment, but they also may feel a risk fueling decades-old anti-porn campaigns and their harmful rhetoric.

Many studios have previously established their own codes of conduct, including Gamma Entertainment-owned Adult Time, which published a guide to “what to expect on an Adult Time set” in 2023, and Kink, which published its shooting protocols, consent documents and checklists in 2019. There are also several talent-focused rights groups, like the Free Speech Coalition, that have operated with performer and crew wellbeing guidelines in place for years.

Michigan Lawmakers Are Attempting to Ban Porn Entirely
The “Anticorruption of Public Morals Act” proposes a total ban on porn in the state, and also targets the existence of trans people online, content like erotic ASMR, and selling VPNs in the state.
404 MediaSamantha Cole

“The landscape for adult production has expanded rapidly over the past few years, so it's encouraging to see bigger studios codify industry best practices,” Mike Stabile, director of public policy at the Free Speech Coalition, told 404 Media. Stabile noted that the needs and requirements of productions and performers vary; independent content creators working with other indie creators might not need or have the resources to hire an intimacy coordinator on each shoot, for example, or a small fetish studio that doesn’t engage in fluid exchange might not need to adhere to testing. But “it sets a bar for what performers can and should expect in production, and provides a framework for understanding one's rights on set,” he said.
playlist.megaphone.fm?p=TBIEA2…
“It's incredibly powerful because it isn't just one studio or one group, it's a collection of some of the most influential leaders in adult production,” Stabile said. “While these practices aren't entirely new, by publishing guidelines they're creating a broad system of accountability. Whether or not other studios join and sign-on, I expect we'll see broader adoption of these protocols at all levels.”

“I believe strong production standards are the foundation of a safe and respectful and successful industry, and I’ve always believed performers deserve nothing less,” performer Cherie DeVille said in the ASA press release. “It's powerful to see these top studios come together with the shared goal of ensuring performer wellness remains a top priority.”

What to Expect on an Adult Time Set - Adult Time Blog

Learn more about working with us through our "What to Expect on Set" campaign and explore Adult Time's new Performer Center.

^{Blog Admin (Adult Time)}

404 Media

2025-11-12 14:49:52

Judge Rules Flock Surveillance Images Are Public Records That Can Be Requested By Anyone

A judge in Washington has ruled that police images taken by Flock’s AI license plate-scanning cameras are public records that can be requested as part of normal public records requests. The decision highlights the sheer volume of the technology-fueled surveillance state in the United States, and shows that at least in some cases, police cannot withhold the data collected by its surveillance systems.

In a ruling last week, Judge Elizabeth Neidzwski ruled that “the Flock images generated by the Flock cameras located in Stanwood and Sedro-Wooley [Washington] are public records under the Washington State Public Records Act,” that they are “not exempt from disclosure,” and that “an agency does not have to possess a record for that record to be subject to the Public Records Act.”

She further found that “Flock camera images are created and used to further a governmental purpose” and that the images on them are public records because they were paid for by taxpayers. Despite this, the records that were requested as part of the case will not be released because the city automatically deleted them after 30 days. Local media in Washington first reported on the case; 404 Media bought Washington State court records to report the specifics of the case in more detail.
A screenshot from the judge's decision
Flock’s automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras are used in thousands of communities around the United States. They passively take between six and 12 timestamped images of each car that passes by, allowing the company to make a detailed database of where certain cars (and by extension, people) are driving in those communities. 404 Media has reported extensively on Flock, and has highlighted that its cameras have been accessed by the Department of Homeland Security and by local police working with DHS on immigration cases. Last month, cops in Colorado used data from Flock cameras to incorrectly accuse an innocent woman of theft based on her car’s movements.

The case came in response to a public records request made by Jose Rodriguez, who in April sought all of the images taken by the city’s Flock cameras between the hours of 5 and 6 p.m. on March 30 (he later narrowed this request to only ask for images taken by a single camera in a half-hour period). The city argued that Rodriguez would have to request them directly from Flock, a private company not subject to public records laws. But Flock’s contracts with cities say that the city owns the images taken on their cameras. The city eventually took Rodriguez to court. In the court proceedings, the city made a series of arguments claiming that Flock images couldn’t be released; the judge’s decision rebuked all of these many arguments.

“I wanted the records to see if they would release them to me, in hopes that if they were public records it would raise awareness to all the communities that have the Flock cameras that they may be public record and could be used by stalkers, or burglars scoping out a house, or other ways someone with bad intentions may use them. My goal was to try getting these cameras taken down by the cities that put them up,” Rodriguez told 404 Media. “In order to show that the records were public records and that they don’t qualify as exempt under the Washington public records act we cited the contract, and I made requests to both cities requesting their exterior normal surveillance camera footage from their City Hall and police station that recorded the streets and parking lots with vehicles driving by and license plates viewable, which is what the Flock images also capture. Both cities provided me with the surveillance videos I requested without issue but denied the Flock images, so my attorney used that to show how they contradict themselves.”

"it is pretty abhorrent that the city tried to make all of these arguments in the first place"

The case highlights the lengths that police departments and cities are willing to go to in order to prevent the release of what they incorrectly perceive to be private information owned by their surveillance vendors (in this case, Flock). Stanwood’s attorneys first argued that the records were Flock’s, not the city’s, which is clearly contradicted in the contract, which states “customer [Stanwood] shall retain whatever legally cognizable right, title, and interest in Customer Generated Data … Flock does not own and shall not sell Customer Generated Data.” The attorneys then argued that images taken by Flock cameras do not become requestable data until it is directly accessed and downloaded by the police on Flock’s customer portal: “the data existing in the cloud system … does not exist anywhere in the City’s files as a record.” The city’s lawyers also argued that Flock footage is police “intelligence information” that should be exempt from public records requests, and that “there are privacy concerns with making ALPR data accessible to the public.”

“Honestly, it is pretty abhorrent that the city tried to make all of these arguments in the first place, but it’s great that the court reaffirmed that these are public records,” Beryl Lipton, senior investigative researcher at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told 404 Media in a phone interview. “So much of the surveillance law enforcement does is facilitated by third party vendors and that information is stored on their external servers. So for the court to start restricting access to the public because law enforcement has started using these types of systems would have been horribly detrimental to the public’s right to know.”

In affidavits filed with the court, police argued that “if the public could access the Flock Safety System by making Public Records Act requests, it would allow nefarious actors the ability to track private persons and undermine the effectiveness of the system.” The judge rejected every single one of these arguments.

Both Lipton and Timothy Hall, Rodriguez’s attorney, said that, to the contrary, Rodriguez’s request actually shows how pervasive mass surveillance systems are in society, and that sharing this information will help communities make better informed decisions about whether they want to use technology like Flock at all.

“We do think there should be redactions for certain privacy reasons, but we absolutely think that as a whole, these should be considered public records,” Lipton said. “This is part of the whole problem: These police departments and these companies are operating under the impression that everything that happens on the street is fair game, and that their systems are not a privacy violation. But then when it comes to the public wanting to know, they say ‘this is a privacy violation,’ and I think that’s them trying to have it both ways.”

Hall said that Rodriguez’s case, reporting by 404 Media, and a recent study by the University of Washington about Flock data being available to immigration enforcement officers, has started a conversation in the state about Flock in general.

“Now because of the Washington State Public Records Act, people can be aware of all the information these cameras are collecting. Now there’s a discussion going on: Do we even want these cameras? Well, they’re collecting way more information than we realized,” Hall told 404 Media in a phone call. “A lot of people are now realizing there’s a ton of information being collected here. This has now opened up a massive discussion which was ultimately the goal.”

A Flock spokesperson told 404 Media that the company believes that the court simply reaffirmed what the law already was. The city of Stanwood did not respond to a request for comment.

Rodriguez said that even after fighting this case, he is not going to get the images that he originally took, because the city automatically deleted it after 30 days, even though he filed his request. He can now file a new one for more recent images, however.

“I won’t be getting the records, even though I win the case (they could also appeal it and continue the case) no matter what I won’t get those records I requested because they no longer exist,” Rodriguez said. “The cities both allowed the records to be automatically deleted after I submitted my records requests and while they decided to have their legal council review my request. So they no longer have the records and can not provide them to me even though they were declared to be public records.”

Leaving the Door Wide Open: Flock Surveillance Systems Expose Washington Data to Immigration Enforcement - Center for Human Rights

Summary Flock Safety automated license plate reader (ALPR) networks have become increasingly common in Washington state.

^{Andrea Marcos (Center for Human Rights)}

404 Media

2025-11-12 14:32:37

Podcast: Inside a Small Town's Fight Against a $1.2 Billion AI Datacenter

We start with Matthew Gault’s dive into a battle between a small town and the construction of a massive datacenter for America’s nuclear weapon scientists. After the break, Joseph explains why people are 3D-printing whistles in Chicago. In the subscribers-only section, Jason zooms out and tells us what librarians are seeing with AI and tech, and how that is impacting their work and knowledge more broadly.
playlist.megaphone.fm?e=TBIEA3…
Listen to the weekly podcast on Apple Podcasts,Spotify, or YouTube. Become a paid subscriber for access to this episode's bonus content and to power our journalism. If you become a paid subscriber, check your inbox for an email from our podcast host Transistor for a link to the subscribers-only version! You can also add that subscribers feed to your podcast app of choice and never miss an episode that way. The email should also contain the subscribers-only unlisted YouTube link for the extended video version too. It will also be in the show notes in your podcast player.
youtube.com/embed/rHk580uKwHw?…
6:03 - ⁠Our New FOIA Forum! 11/19, 1PM ET⁠

7:50 - ⁠A Small Town Is Fighting a $1.2 Billion AI Datacenter for America's Nuclear Weapon Scientists⁠

12:27 - ⁠'A Black Hole of Energy Use': Meta's Massive AI Data Center Is Stressing Out a Louisiana Community⁠

21:09 - ⁠'House of Dynamite' Is About the Zoom Call that Ends the World⁠

30:35 - ⁠The Latest Defense Against ICE: 3D-Printed Whistles⁠

SUBSCRIBER'S STORY: ⁠AI Is Supercharging the War on Libraries, Education, and Human Knowledge⁠

The 404 Media Podcast

Tech News Podcast · Updated Weekly · Welcome to the podcast from 404 Media where Joseph, Sam, Emanuel, and Jason catch you up on the stories we published this week. 404 Media is a journalist-owned digital media company exploring the way …

^{Apple Podcasts}