Now that the EU plans for mandatory screening of private communications and the removal of secure encryption (chat control 2.0) have been put on ice for the time being due to a lack of majority in the EU Council, the European Parliament‘s rapporteur Birgit Sippel (S&D) in today‘s draft report proposes to approve the Commission’s proposal to extend the existing voluntary chat control regime with some changes. So far, the EU‘s regulation greenlighting the indiscriminate scanning of direct messages for suspected content on Instagram Messenger, Facebook Messenger, GMail and XBox is set to expire on 3 August 2024. Pirate Party Member of the European Parliament and most prominent opponent of chat control Patrick Breyer, who is also his group’s lead negotiator, comments:


“Instead of taking up the EU Parliament’s new approach for more effective and court-proof child protection without chat control mass surveillance, EU Commissioner ‘Big Sister’ Johansson is incorrigibly insisting in the destruction of digital privacy of correspondence, playing for time and hoping to manipulate critical EU states into agreeing by running infamous campaigns and spreading misinformation. This approach has gotten us into deadlock politically, failing children and abuse victims alike. We should clearly reject this strategy and insist on finding better solutions than mass surveillance, as proposed by the European Parliament last year.”

According to her draft report, Sippel wants to extend voluntary chat monitoring by one instead of two years as proposed by the Commission or three years as requested by the Council. She wants to phase out the automated searching of chat texts for grooming-related keywords – although this is hardly used anyway and accounts for 0.2% of reports only.

Breyer sharply criticises the instrument of voluntary chat control: “The voluntary mass surveillance of our private communication by US services such as Meta, Google or Microsoft does not make any significant contribution to saving abused children or convicting abusers, but conversely criminalises thousands of minors, overburdens law enforcement officers and opens the door to arbitrary private justice by internet companies. If, according to Johansson’s own statements, only one in four flagged converations are relevant to the police at all, this means 75,000 leaked intimate beach photos and nude pictures for Germany every year, which are not safe with unknown moderators abroad and do not belong in their hands.” 



“The regulation on voluntary chat control is both unnecessary and contrary to fundamental rights: social networks as hosting services do not need a regulation to check public posts. The same applies to suspicious activity reports by users. And the error-prone automated reports from the screening of private communications by Zuckerberg’s Meta Group, which account for 80% of chat messages, will be eliminated anyway by the announced introduction of end-to-end encryption. The legal opinion of a former ECJ judge proves that voluntary chat monitoring as a suspicionless and comprehensive surveillance measure is contrary to fundamental rights. A victim of abuse and I are taking legal action against this and the Ministry of Digital Affairs has confirmed that the exemption regulation does not allow for voluntary chat monitoring in Germany at all.” 



The Committee on Home Affairs (LIBE) is expected to approve the extension of voluntary chat controls on 29 January. The Parliament wants to reach an agreement with the Council in the second week of February, and the extension should be approved shortly afterwards.

Meanwhile, the EU interior ministers are to vote again in March on the introduction of mandatory chat control 2.0 for all providers, according to the Belgian Presidency‘s planning.

patrick-breyer.de/en/european-…

In the final stage of negotiations on the EU’s AI Act, it has become known that even the publicly announced limitation of the controversial facial recognition technology to the prosecution of serious criminal offences has since fallen. Digital freedom fighter and Member of the European Parliament Patrick Breyer (Pirate Party) warns that the law paves the way for the introduction of biometric mass surveillance in Europe where EU governments decide to steer this course.

“With this AI law, it appears the EU intends to compete with China not only technologically but also in terms of high-tech repression. The fact that error-prone facial recognition applied to CCTV recordings is being green-lighted for petty offences falls short of the EU Parliament’s own press release. This will make it possible for cities to oust homeless people under the heading of ‘trespassing’, as happened in Como, Italy, or to prosecute sprayers for ‘damaging property’. Even the highly controversial facial recognition among demonstrators, such as after the G20 summit in Hamburg, is not being excluded. On the basis of these rules, facial recognition and chilling effect that comes with it, threatens to become a standard instrument in Europe, too.

The EU’s AI Act even opens the door to permanent facial surveillance in real time: Over 6,000 people are wanted by European arrest warrant for the offences listed in the AI Act. Any public space in Europe can therefore be placed under permanent biometric mass surveillance on these grounds. This law legitimises and normalises a culture of mistrust. It leads Europe into a dystopian future of a mistrustful high-tech surveillance state.”

patrick-breyer.de/en/ai-act-th…

feddit.it è un server italiano che permette agli utenti di iscriversi a una piattaforma di nome Lemmy, molto simile a Reddit ma integrata nel Fediverso, l’ecosistema di cui fanno parte anche Mastodon, Friendica, Pixelfed e, forse a breve, anche Threads. Gli utenti possono iscriversi anche senza dover lasciare l’email, ma devono superare un piccolo test per dimostrare di non essere dei bot o utenti…

Source

informapirata

2024-01-14 18:39:06

Una riflessione sui successi e gli insuccessi del progetto feddit.it e le prospettive del lemmyverso e del bloggingverso. E voi che ne pensate?

informapirata.it/2024/01/14/fe…

feddit.it: tutte le criticità e le potenzialità dell’alternativa italiana a Reddit tra bloggingverso e fediverso - informapirata

^{informapirata}

On Monday, the negotiating teams in the European Parliament’s LIBE Committee will discuss amendments for the first time. Pirate Party MEP Patrick Breyer, his group’s lead negotiator in the LIBE Committee, is requesting fundamental changes to the proposal:

“For the digital euro to be worthy of its name and have meaning and added value compared to credit cards and cryptocurrencies, digital cash must be as anonymous and free to use as notes and coins – not just when both parties are physically present. The introduction of digital cash is overdue in the current reality of life in the information age.

As there is no limit to the amount of cash we can hold and pass on, there should be no limit to the amount of digital euros in our hands. And just as cash can be used to make confidential payments and controversial donations anonymously and without fear of disclosure, trace-free payments in digital euros must not be made impossible or limited to an unknown and variable amount, as proposed by the EU Commission. The justification of wanting to combat money laundering and terrorism is just a pretext for gaining more and more control over our private transactions. Where every payment is recorded and stored forever, there is a threat of hacker attacks, unauthorised investigations and chilling government control over every payment.

Cash is financial freedom without the pressure to justify it. What medicines or sex toys I buy is nobody’s business. For thousands of years, societies around the world have lived with privacy-preserving cash. This financial freedom must also be guaranteed in the information age. We need to find ways to take the best features of cash into our digital future.”

Specifically, Breyer calls for decentralised offline payments directly between end devices to be permitted not only in physical presence (amendment 76) and for them not to be subject to any disadvantages compared to cash, such as limits (amendments 203-205, 207).

patrick-breyer.de/en/digital-e…