Live du 10/12 - Surveillance des personnes étrangères : aux frontières du fascisme
Cette semaine, nous avons parlé de la surveillance des frontières et du rôle que jouent les technologies numériques dans les politiques de contrôle et de répression des populations étrangères.
The Pirate Post reshared this.
Stop the gatekeeping. The First Amendment is for all of us
Dear Friend of Press Freedom,
Rümeysa Öztürk has been facing deportation for 262 days for co-writing an op-ed the government didn’t like, and journalist Ya’akub Vijandre remains locked up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement over social media posts about issues he reported on. Read on for more on what we’re working on this week.
Stop the gatekeeping. The First Amendment’s for all of us
In the early days of the internet, online news confused analog-era judges, who pondered questions like, “If this is journalism then why are there no ink smudges on my fingers?” These days, First Amendment advocates tend to chuckle when thinking back on that era. But apparently it’s not quite over yet.
Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) Senior Adviser Caitlin Vogus wrote for the Sun-Sentinel about a judge in Florida’s unfortunate ruling that YouTube-based outlet Popcorned Planet can’t avail itself of the state’s reporter’s privilege to oppose a subpoena from actor Blake Lively. The court’s decision would “effectively exclude any independent journalist who publishes using online platforms from relying on the privilege to protect their sources.” If it stands, “vital information will stay buried,” she explained.
And FPF Executive Director Trevor Timm spoke to Columbia Journalism Review about another subpoena from Lively that’s testing whether celebrity blogger Perez Hilton can claim the privilege. “Hilton is gathering information, talking to sources, and publishing things in order to have the public consume them. That fits the definition of a journalist,” Timm explained. As CJR noted, FPF’s U.S. Press Freedom Tracker “was one of the few to highlight the Hilton case.”
It’s not a question of whether Popcorned Planet and Hilton are great journalists or if they pass some editorial purity test. It’s a question of whether the courts will allow litigants to chip away at First Amendment rights that protect all journalists, no matter what platform they use to report or what subjects they cover.
Administration is trolling America with its FOIA responses
As The New York Times reported this week, Immigration and Customs Enforcement claimed it has no body-worn camera footage from Operation Midway Blitz in Chicago, Illinois, despite a federal judge’s explicit order that agents wear and activate those cameras.
And as The Daily Beast reported, the Department of Homeland Security told FFP’s Daniel Ellsberg Chair on Government Secrecy Lauren Harper that Kristi Noem had no Truth Social Direct messages, despite her millions of followers. Harper requested cabinet officials’ messages in a Freedom of Information Act request after President Donald Trump accidentally publicly posted correspondence with Attorney General Pam Bondi.
As Harper told the Times, “They are trolling citizens and judges … ICE continues to feel increasing impunity and that it has the right to behave as a secret police that’s exempt from accountability.” FPF is, of course, appealing.
Don’t weaken Puerto Rico’s public records law
When the U.S. Navy quietly reactivated Roosevelt Roads Naval Station in Puerto Rico earlier this year, some residents saw the promise of new jobs, while others saw it as a painful reminder of past harms from the American military presence on the island.
Puerto Ricans — and Americans everywhere — deserve basic answers about what the military is up to as tensions escalate with Venezuela and whether Puerto Rico’s government is coordinating with the Pentagon and whether their concerns are being taken into account. And of course, there are countless local issues Puerto Ricans are entitled to be informed about.
But at the moment when transparency is most essential, lawmakers are trying to slam the door shut.
Don’t just take our word for it…
Throughout 2025 we’ve been hosting online events platforming journalists impacted by anti-press policies at the national and local levels, so you can hear directly from the people we hope will benefit from our work.
Read about three of our recent events. This week’s panel features journalists whose reporting is complicated by sources unwilling to come forward due to fear of retaliation. Last week we spoke with journalists about the difficulties of covering the immigration beat during Trump 2.0, and last month we talked about the immigration cases against journalists Sami Hamdi and Ya’akub Vijandre over their support for Palestinian rights (shoutout to our friends at The Dissenter for writing up that event). And there are even more past events on our YouTube channel.
WHAT WE'RE READING
Chokehold: Donald Trump’s war on free speech and the need for systemic resistance
Free Press
In a comprehensive new report, Free Press’s Nora Benavidez analyzes how Trump and his political enablers have sought to undermine and chill the most basic freedoms protected by the First Amendment.
Press freedom advocates sound alarm over Ya’akub Vijandre, stuck for over two months in ICE custody in Georgia
WABE
We cannot just accept that “every so often the administration is going to abduct some lawful resident who said something it doesn’t like about Israel or Palestine,” FPF’s Seth Stern told WABE.
Watched, tracked, and targeted: Life in Gaza under Israel’s all-encompassing surveillance regime
New York Magazine
A powerful essay by Palestinian journalist Mohammed Mhawish about life in Gaza “under Israel’s all-encompassing surveillance regime.”
ICEBlock creator sues Trump administration officials saying they pressured Apple to remove it from the app store
CNN
Threatening to punish app stores if they don’t remove apps the government dislikes is unconstitutional. This time it’s ICEBlock, but tomorrow it could be a news app.
Longtime LA radio exec Will Lewis dies; Went to prison in Hearst case
My News LA
Many heroes work behind the scenes on press freedom. Will Lewis was one of them. A radio executive who championed public media, he spent 15 days in prison to protect sources. RIP.
‘Heroic excavators of government secrets’
National Security Archive
Congratulations to the indefatigable National Security Archive on 40 years of clawing back the self-serving veil of government secrecy.
Mercredi 17 décembre - Répression administrative : l’État d'urgence sans fin contre les musulman·es
La semaine prochaine, on s’attaquera aux techniques de répression utilisées par les services de renseignement contre les personnes musulmanes, à commencer par les assignations à résidence et l’utilisation de notes blanches pour les criminaliser.
The Pirate Post reshared this.
Nous recevrons Mathilde Dabed de la Legal Team Antiraciste, collectif de militant·es et d'avocat·es en lutte contre la répression, le racisme et les violences d'État, ainsi que Rayan Freschi de CAGE International, ONG britannique qui documente et dénonce les abus liés aux politiques antiterroristes et défend les droits des personnes musulmanes. Mais également Nicolas Klausser, juriste spécialisé en droit des étrangers.
Rendez-vous le 17/12 à 19h sur Twitch, Peertube et Youtube !
Faites un don à La Quadrature du Net
C'EST PAS DE L'IA Quand on entend parler d'intelligence artificielle, c'est l'histoire d'un mythe moderne qui nous est racontée. Celui d'une IA miraculeuse qui doit sauver le monde, ou d'une IA douée de volonté qui voudrait le détruire.La Quadrature du Net
Larchmutz⏚ 🦊 🍂 reshared this.
FinTech und Datenschutz: PayPal sammelt die sexuellen Vorlieben von Kunden
netzpolitik.org/2025/fintech-u…
reshared this
Digital Fights: Digital Lights: Wir kämpfen gegen Handydurchsuchungen bei Geflüchteten
netzpolitik.org/2025/digital-f…
Journalists warn of silenced sources
From national outlets to college newspapers, reporters are running into the same troubling trend: sources who are afraid to speak to journalists because they worry about retaliation from the federal government.
This fear, and how journalists can respond to it, was the focus of a recent panel discussion hosted by Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF), the Association of Health Care Journalists, and the Society of Environmental Journalists. Reporters from a range of beats described how the second Trump administration has changed the way people talk to the press, and what journalists do to reassure sources and keep them safe.
youtube.com/embed/rIyRDQFEl4k?…
For journalist Grace Hussain, a solutions correspondent at Sentient Media, this shift became unmistakable when sources who relied on federal funding suddenly backed out of participating in her reporting. “Their concerns were very legitimate,” Hussain said, “It was possible that their funding could get retracted or withdrawn” for speaking to the press.
When Hussain reached out to other reporters, she found that sources’ reluctance to speak to the press for fear of federal retaliation is an increasingly widespread issue that’s already harming news coverage. “There are a lot of stories that are under-covered, and it’s just getting more difficult at this point to do that sort of coverage with the climate that we’re in,” she said.
Lizzy Lawrence, who covers the Food and Drug Administration for Stat, has seen a different but equally unsettling pattern. Lawrence has found that more government sources want to talk about what’s happening in their agencies, but often only if they’re not named. Since Trump returned to office, she said, many sources “would request only to speak on the condition of anonymity, because of fears of being fired.” As a result, her newsroom is relying more on confidential sources, with strict guardrails, like requiring multiple sources to corroborate information.
For ProPublica reporter Sharon Lerner, who’s covered health and the environment across multiple administrations, the heightened fear is impossible to miss. Some longtime sources have cut off communication with her, including one who told her they were falsely suspected of leaking.
And yet, she added, speaking to the press may be one of the last options left for employees trying to expose wrongdoing. “So many of the avenues for federal employees to seek justice or address retaliation have been shut down,” Lerner said.
This chilling effect extends beyond federal agencies. Emily Spatz, editor-in-chief of Northeastern’s independent student newspaper The Huntington News, described how fear spread among international students after federal agents detained Mahmoud Kahlil and Rümeysa Öztürk. Visa revocations of students at Northeastern only deepened the concern.
Students started asking the newspaper to take down previously published op-eds they worried could put them at risk, a step Spatz took after careful consideration. The newsroom ultimately removed six op-eds but posted a public website documenting each removal to preserve transparency.
Even as the paper worked hard to protect sources, many became reluctant to participate in their reporting. One student, for instance, insisted the newspaper remove a photo showing the back of their head, a method the paper had used specifically to avoid identifying sources.
Harlo Holmes, the chief information security officer and director of digital security at FPF, said these patterns mirror what journalists usually experience under authoritarian regimes, but — until now — have not been seen in the United States. Whistleblowing is a “humongously heroic act,” Holmes said, “and it is not always without its repercussions.”
She urged reporters to adopt rigorous threat-modeling practices and to be transparent with sources about the tools and techniques they use to keep them safe. Whether using SecureDrop, Signal, or other encrypted channels, she said journalists should make it easy for sources to find out how to contact them securely. “A little bit of education goes a long way,” she said.
For more on how journalists are working harder than ever to protect vulnerable sources, watch the full event recording here.
Covering immigration in a climate of fear
As the federal government ramps up immigration enforcement, sweeping through cities, detaining citizens and noncitizens, separating families, and carrying out deportations, journalists covering immigration have had to step up their work, too.
Journalists on the immigration beat today are tasked with everything from uncovering government falsehoods to figuring out what their communities need to know and protecting their sources. Recently, Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) hosted a conversation with journalists Maritza Félix, the founder and director of Conecta Arizona; Arelis Hernández, a reporter for The Washington Post; and Lam Thuy Vo, an investigative reporter with Documented. They discussed the challenges they face and shared how they report on immigration with humanity and accuracy, while keeping their sources and themselves safe.
youtube.com/embed/OPPo0YzKfnA?…
Immigration reporting has grown a lot more difficult, explained Hernández, as sources increasingly fear retaliation from the government. “I spend a lot of time at the front end explaining, ‘Where will this go? What will it look like?’” Hernández said, describing her process of working with sources to ensure they participate in reporting knowingly and safely. She also outlined her own precautions, from using encrypted devices to carrying protective gear, highlighting just how unsafe conditions have become, even for U.S.-born reporters.
Like Hernández, Félix also emphasized the intense fear and uncertainty many immigrant sources experience. Other sources, however, may be unaware of the possible consequences of speaking to reporters and need to be protected as well. “I think when we’re talking about sources, particularly with immigration, we’re talking about people who are sharing their most vulnerable moments in their life, and I think the way that we treat it is going to be very decisive on their future,” she said.
Journalists who are themselves immigrants must also manage personal risk, Félix said, “but the risk is always going to be there just because of who we are and what we represent in this country.” She pointed to the arrest and deportation of journalist Mario Guevara in Georgia, saying it “made me think that could have been me” before she became a U.S. citizen. She recommended that newsrooms provide security training, mental health resources, and operational protocols for both staff and freelancers.
Both Félix and Vo, who work in newsrooms by and for immigrant communities, emphasized the need for journalists to actively listen to the people they cover. “If you’re trying to serve immigrants, build a listening mechanism, some kind of way of continuing to listen to both leaders in the community, service providers, but also community members,” Vo advised. She also recommended that journalists use risk assessments and threat modeling to plan how to protect themselves and their sources.
Watch the full discussion here.
DNS-Massenüberwachung: „Das war dringend notwendig, diese neue Idee einer Schleppnetzfahndung im Internet abzuwenden“
netzpolitik.org/2025/dns-masse…
news.dyne.org/the-birth-of-zkc…
The Pirate Post reshared this.
#CyberSecurity
securebulletin.com/a-silent-ki…
A Silent Killer Sneaking into Your Code: New Campaign Targets VS Code Developers
From seemingly innocuous extensions to stealthy trojans, the threat landscape for developers is evolving.securebulletin.com
reshared this
Hier, la préfète du Rhône a interdit les évènements et concerts de l’Antifa Fest de Lyon au prétexte que « l’ambiance hostile aux forces de l’ordre » pourrait porter un trouble à l’ordre public. Cette interdiction est choquante.
La critique de la police est un pilier de la lutte antifasciste et la dénonciation des violences d’État par des militant·es et des artistes est nécessaire et légitime au regard de la liberté d’expression.
reshared this
Bonjour,
À ce sujet, et parce que je refuse leur impunité, nous ne devons jamais oublier les vies perdues à cause des violences policières.
J’ai créé un site web qui recense, de manière communautaire, toutes les violences et bavures policières. Chacun peut y témoigner, compléter les informations manquantes et partager son expérience.
L’objectif est de garder ces faits en mémoire, surtout quand les opposants sont diabolisés et les oppresseurs glorifiés
Le Lyon Antifa Fest aura lieu : la préfecture déboutée au tribunal
Le tribunal administratif de Lyon a annulé jeudi 11 décembre l'arrêté préfectoral d'interdiction du Lyon Antifa Fest, émis la veille.Méline Pulliat (Rue89Lyon)
#CyberSecurity
securebulletin.com/gitlab-rele…
GitLab Releases Critical Security Patch for Multiple High-Severity Vulnerabilities
Security researchers have uncovered vulnerabilities in GitLab’s Community Edition and Enterprise Edition platforms, prompting the company to release critical security patches. On December 10th, 2025, Gitlab released update versions (18.6.2, 18.5.securebulletin.com
reshared this
EDRi-gram, 11 December 2025
What has the EDRi network been up to over the past few weeks? Find out the latest digital rights news in our bi-weekly newsletter. In this edition: 2025 might be almost over, but we aren’t done fighting for digital rights
The post EDRi-gram, 11 December 2025 appeared first on European Digital Rights (EDRi).
Migrant smuggling laws: European Commission found in breach of transparency rules
The European Ombudsman has found that the Commission disregarded important transparency rules while preparing the Europol Regulation, which is a part of the legislation to "counter migrant smuggling". The inquiry concluded that the Commission didn't provide enough evidence to justify the claims of "urgency" to bypass their own 'Better Regulation' rules, and skipping public consultations, thorough impact assessments and evidence gathering.
The post Migrant smuggling laws: European Commission found in breach of transparency rules appeared first on European Digital Rights (EDRi).
Ultra processati: una questione di sanità pubblica globale prioritaria
Anche in attesa di capire esattamente in che modo gli ultra processati danneggino l’organismo è indispensabile agire.Agnese Codignola (Il Fatto Alimentare)
reshared this
How Danes je nov dan helped stop dangerous spyware in Slovenia
EDRi affiliate Danes je nov dan launched a multi-faceted campaign in response to a government proposal that would allow the Slovene Intelligence and Security Agency (SOVA) to use invasive spyware and mass surveillance tools under the guise of “national security”. By combining a satirical online tool with targeted advocacy towards lawmakers, their efforts helped generate critical pressure needed to stop the legislation from being adopted.
The post How Danes je nov dan helped stop dangerous spyware in Slovenia appeared first on European Digital Rights (EDRi).
Moving past ‘Chat Control’ to solutions that truly protect kids and privacy
This article highlights evidence-based alternatives that strengthen child safety while safeguarding encryption and fundamental rights. It calls for better enforcement, more targeted tools, and meaningful support for child protection services rather than broad surveillance measures.
The post Moving past ‘Chat Control’ to solutions that truly protect kids and privacy appeared first on European Digital Rights (EDRi).
plan-A reshared this.
When you read Fascintern media, you are reading editorialised fascism. You aren't protesting. You have no power. You are just subjecting yourself to an information space that is editorially structured to promote fascism.
When you write for Fascintern media, you are choosing to publish with them.
Fascintern Media
We are facing a coordinated international fascist movement that works with explicit backing from Moscow, Washington, and tech monopolies, and is propagating itself through its own media apparatus.Robin Berjon
The Pirate Post reshared this.
Digitale Skelette: „Wir brauchen Transparenz, wo in Gerichtsverfahren KI eingesetzt wird“
netzpolitik.org/2025/digitale-…
Puerto Rico may roll back transparency just when it matters the most
When the U.S. Navy quietly reactivated Roosevelt Roads Naval Station in Puerto Rico earlier this year, the move stirred both anxiety and hope. While some residents saw the promise of new jobs, others saw it as a painful reminder of past harms from the American military presence on the island.
Whatever their views, Puerto Ricans — and Americans everywhere — deserve basic answers about what the military is up to as tensions escalate with Venezuela. They should know whether Puerto Rico’s government is coordinating with the Pentagon and whether their concerns are being taken into account. And of course, there are countless local issues having nothing to do with international conflicts that Puerto Ricans are entitled to be informed about.
But at the very moment when transparency is most essential, Puerto Rican lawmakers are trying to slam the door shut. Senate Bill 63, a major rewrite of the island’s transparency law, was recently rushed through the legislature with little public input. It weakens the public’s right to know at every turn.
SB 63 would undermine transparency
Puerto Rico’s existing transparency law, passed in 2019, already faces serious problems. Recently, for instance, the American Civil Liberties Union of Puerto Rico sued to uncover records about how the territory’s transportation agency shared confidential driver’s license information with federal immigration officials, which may have violated local laws.
SB 63 would make it even harder for the public to know what government officials are doing. The bill significantly extends the deadline for responding to records requests, more than doubling it in some cases. For time-sensitive investigations, especially by journalists, these delays could bury relevant information or make it irrelevant or obsolete, crippling efforts to expose the truth.
This bill will also make it harder for the public to understand the information they do receive. Today, requesters can ask for information in easy-to-analyze formats, like statistics or spreadsheets. SB 63 would eliminate that right, making it harder to find specific information that’s of the most use to the public.
In addition, SB 63 would require agency heads to be alerted to every single records request. This change injects politics into what should be a straightforward process. At the federal level, both Democrats and Republicans have used similar review systems to conceal politically inconvenient information.
What’s more, SB 63 would also require agencies to withhold records that any judge has previously deemed confidential, even if that ruling came from a single lower court and was never reviewed or affirmed. But judges get things wrong all the time — that’s why their rulings are not precedential and are subject to appellate review. Under SB 63, a single questionable decision from a single judge could lock in secrecy indefinitely.
SB 63 would leave Puerto Ricans and all Americans less informed
Puerto Rican lawmakers seem to know SB 63 would be unpopular. The Senate approved it without a public hearing, and the House allowed just one day of testimony, during which many entities were shut out. It’s not an accident that an anti-transparency bill was pushed through with as little transparency as possible.
The timing couldn’t be worse — and not only because Puerto Rico seems to be one of the main platforms for U.S.-projected interventions in Venezuela. As Puerto Rico faces deep challenges in housing, education, and climate, reducing access to information will only exacerbate existing problems.
The need for local transparency is heightened exponentially by Puerto Rico’s colonialism. Public records are essential for understanding issues such as failures in hurricane relief by federal and local authorities, collaboration between local agencies and federal immigration officials, and the impact of federal policies on the territory’s schools and colleges.
In addition, cuts to federal Freedom of Information Act offices are already making it harder for Puerto Ricans to obtain information from Washington. If local transparency is also weakened, oversight and accountability will become virtually nonexistent.
Fortunately, Puerto Ricans refuse to be silent. More than 50 civil society organizations, along with community and academic leaders, have urged Gov. Jenniffer González Colón to veto SB 63 because the legislation is bad for Puerto Rico’s citizens, businesses, and democracy itself.
Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) also joined other press freedom organizations in a letter led by the Committee to Protect Journalists, calling on her to reject the bill.
Puerto Rico can’t afford to be left in the dark. SB 63 dims the light of transparency precisely when we need it the most. Gov. González should reject SB 63 and stand unequivocally with the people’s right to know.
On démarre dans quelques instants !
Faites un don à La Quadrature du Net
Aujourd’hui, plus personne ne hausse les épaules de façon crédible quand on parle d’un retour des fascismes. À La Quadrature du Net, nous parlons « d’autoritarisme » depuis longtemps.La Quadrature du Net
reshared this
Today, #Australia enforced a social media ban for kids under 16.
The same debate is happening in Europe, where #AgeVerification measures are gaining traction, with the European Commission, the Council of the EU, and the European Parliament all endorsing similar approaches.
‼️ Reminder: age verification is not real protection. It’s a quick techno-fix that locks young people out of spaces while failing to address the root problems of broken platforms.
More ➡️ edri.org/our-work/why-age-veri…
Why age verification misses the mark and puts everyone at risk - European Digital Rights (EDRi)
Age verification is a short-sighted, ineffective and dangerous way to protect young people form online harms.European Digital Rights (EDRi)
reshared this
Behold, the Digital Identity Musketeers!
Say hello to dynes at the 2025 EUDI.Wallets Launchpad
ec.europa.eu/digital-building-…
The Pirate Post reshared this.
L'arte della #frode (scientifica) in Italia
Gli elementi che più hanmo influito sui cattivi comportamenti nel nostro Paese sembrano essere un sistema di valutazione performance based (soprattutto per quanto riguarda l’accesso alle carriere accademiche tramite la #ASN) premia la quantità, e il fatto che a quanto riporta Schneider (autore del blog For better science attualmente inibito ad alcuni provider italiani) raramente ci siano ripercussioni in caso di frode scientifica. (corsivi aggiunti)
Sequestro per oscuramento: in Italia non si può parlare di frodi scientifiche
Da qualche settimana il sito www.forbetterscience.com è irraggiungibile per chi si connette a Internet da alcuni provider italiani (Vodafone, Iliad, Fastweb).ROARS
reshared this
1/6📍#ChatControl: Yesterday, EU lawmakers entered the final stage of negotiations ('trilogues') on the controversial #CSARegulation, aka Chat Control.
📣 EDRi has been advocating for years to make sure that this law tackles the severe crime of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) online without resorting to #MassSurveillance, breaking #encryption or compelling people to undergo intrusive age checks, all of which would have harmful consequences for people and communities.
reshared this
Oblomov reshared this.
reshared this
reshared this
5/6 ⚠️ Mass surveillance could present itself in two ways: 1) if the Council's preferred voluntary scanning regime is extended indefinitely, #BigTech companies could be allowed to scan the messages of users without any need for suspicion of CSAM crimes.
2) the Council also wants to make it mandatory for most or all private communications services (emails, Signal messages, WhatsApp, etc.) and app stores to use age verification or similar tools. This would have a huge chilling effect.
reshared this
6/6 ⚠️ These are not the only issues still plaguing the law. Technically infeasible network blocking rules; unreliable scanning technologies; a creeping risk of excessive law enforcement powers over supposedly independent institutions; and many others remain.
🧐 Want to know the latest happenings on the CSA Regulation trilogues? EDRi is keeping our Document Pool up-to-date with all the official developments as well as our analyses: edri.org/our-work/csa-regulati…
CSA Regulation Document Pool - European Digital Rights (EDRi)
This document pool contains updates and resources on the EU's proposed 'Regulation laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual abuse'European Digital Rights (EDRi)
Oblomov reshared this.
Databroker Files: Handy-Daten exponieren Begleiter von Emmanuel Macron
netzpolitik.org/2025/databroke…
Internes Dokument: EU-Staaten fordern ein Jahr Vorratsdatenspeicherung für Internet-Dienste wie Messenger
netzpolitik.org/2025/internes-…
Further PPI GA Information
Dear All Members of Pirate Parties International and all interested parties,
The 2025-2026 PPI Winter GA will take place on Saturday, January 10th, 2026, starting at 09:00 UTC.
The event will be hybrid with some participants physically attending in Potsdam, Germany.
If representatives from your organization intend to participate in person, please let us know by
requesting a completely free ticket here: eventbrite.com/e/1975346809482
Discussion about the GA is currently on Discourse: ga.pp-international.net/
Further information is also available on our Wiki:
wiki.pp-international.net/wiki…
The meeting will take place on the PPI Board Jitsi Channel: jitsi.pirati.cz/PPI-Board
If we have connection problems we will revert to our Mumble:
wiki.pp-international.net/wiki…
If you have any statute amendments or new member applications, please make sure that you send
them to the board by December 10th. If you have any other motions or any other business, feel
free to bring them up before the meeting, and you are free to propose them at the meeting itself.
It is very important that we make a quorum, so please delegate your vote to another member if
you cannot come to the event. Please also forward this message to other PPI members.
Delegates should be announced to the board prior to the start of the GA. Each member may have
up to 6 delegates. Others are welcome to attend without voting. Rules of the GA can be reviewed
on the Wiki: wiki.pp-international.net/wiki…
We also remind full members to pay membership fees. We don’t want anyone not to participate if
they don’t have funds to pay membership fees, so please let us know if you require a discount or
accommodation. Please note that nascent members have no membership fees.
We hope that many of you can attend, either in person or online.
Good luck to us on having a successful event!
Thank you for your assistance,
The Board of PPI
reshared this
#CyberSecurity
insicurezzadigitale.com/i-geme…
I gemelli hacker che cancellarono i database del governo USA - (in)sicurezza digitale
Non c’è minaccia interna più pericolosa di quella che già conosce le tue password. E quando quella minaccia ha il volto di due ex-condannati che riesconoDario Fadda (inSicurezzaDigitale.com)
reshared this
#CyberSecurity
securebulletin.com/a-sneaky-ne…
A Sneaky New Threat: Microsoft Teams Calls and QuickAssist Lead to Stealthy Malware Attacks
From phishing calls to fileless malware, the evolution of cyberattacks is alarmingly rapid. The latest threat employs a sophisticated blend of social engineering and technical prowess to bypass traditional security measures.securebulletin.com
reshared this
#CyberSecurity
securebulletin.com/vscode-a-ne…
VSCode: A New Wave of Malware Exploits the Heart of Creative Workflows
The lines between personal work and corporate security are increasingly blurring, especially for developers.securebulletin.com
reshared this
Social-Media-Bann in Australien startet: Ein dunkler Tag für den Jugendschutz im Netz
netzpolitik.org/2025/social-me…
Mein Essay dazu, was auf dem Spiel steht: patrick-breyer.de/der-digitale…
Der digitale Hausarrest – wie die EU Familien entmündigen will
Ausgerechnet bürgerliche Parteien unterstützen in Brüssel Pläne zur massenhaften Durchleuchtung privater Nachrichten. Das Vorhaben greift tief in bürgerliche Freiheiten ein.Patrick Breyer
reshared this
Ritrattato lo studio non disinteressato per il quale il #glifosato non era nocivo.
I tempi lunghi di ritrattazione sono dovuti all'interesse delle riviste commerciali ai punteggi citazionali. Senza #bibliometria, peraltro, gli autori sarebbero i primi a voler ritirare testi che fanno fare loro brutta figura.
Ritirato lo studio che scagionava il glifosato. Lo aveva scritto Monsanto, che lo produce e lo vende
Costretta alla «retraction» la rivista scientifica che lo aveva pubblicato. Dubbi già nel 2018, ma l’articolo fin qui è sempre stato citato per sostenere il no a ogni divieto (Andrea Capocci –…infosannio
reshared this
La Quadrature du Net
in reply to La Quadrature du Net • • •Nous avons reçu Romain Lanneau de @statewatch, une organisation britannique qui documente et analyse ces thématiques ainsi que Paloma et Pauline de Human Rights Observers, une association qui dénonce les violences étatiques perpétrées à l'encontre des personnes déplacées à la frontière franco-britannique.
Pour voir la rediffusion du live : video.lqdn.fr/w/uw4CDTUfm3yHF7…
Prochain live le mercredi 17 décembre à 19h !
La Quadrature du Net
in reply to La Quadrature du Net • • •Faites un don à La Quadrature du Net
La Quadrature du NetEm reshared this.