In a marvelous college lecture in front of a class of engineering students, V. Hunter Adams professed his love for embedded engineering, but he might as well have been singing the songs of our people – the hackers. If you occasionally feel the need to explain to people why you do what you do, at fancy cocktail parties or something, this talk is great food for thought. It’s about as good a “Why We Hack” as I’ve ever seen.

Among the zingers, “projects are filter removers” stuck out. When you go through life, there are a lot of things that you kinda understand. Or maybe you’ve not even gotten around to thinking about whether you understand them or not, and just take them for granted. Life would all simply be too complicated if you took it all sufficiently seriously. Birdsong, Bluetooth, the sun in the sky, the friction of your car’s tire on various surfaces. These are all incredibly deep subjects, when you start to peel back the layers.

And Hunter’s point is that if you are working on a project that involves USB, your success or failure depends on understanding USB. There’s no room for filters here – the illusion that it “just works” often comes crashing down until you learn enough to make it work. Some of his students are doing projects cooperatively with the ornithology department, classifying and creating birdsong. Did you know that birds do this elaborate frequency modulation thing when they sing? Once you hear it, you know, and you hear it ever more.

So we agree with Hunter. Dive into a project because you want to get the project done, sure, but pick the project because it’s a corner of the world that you’d like to shine light into, to remove the filters of “I think I basically understand that”. When you get it working, you’ll know that you really do. Hacking your way to enlightenment? We’ve heard crazier things.

This article is part of the Hackaday.com newsletter, delivered every seven days for each of the last 200+ weeks. It also includes our favorite articles from the last seven days that you can see on the web version of the newsletter. Want this type of article to hit your inbox every Friday morning? You should sign up!

hackaday.com/2025/05/31/pullin…

It would be hard to find any electronics still in production which use CRT displays, but for some inscrutable reason it’s easy to find cheap 4-inch CRTs on AliExpress. Not that we’re complaining, of course. Especially when they get picked up for projects like this Retro CRT Weather Display from [Conrad Farnsworth], which recreates the interface of The Weather Channel’s WeatherStar 4000+ in a suitably 90s-styled format.

The CRT itself takes up most of the space in the enclosure, with the control electronics situated in the base behind the display driver. A Raspberry Pi Zero W provides the necessary processing power, and connects to the CRT through its composite video output.

A custom PCB plugs into the GPIO header on the Raspberry Pi and provides some additional features, such as a rotary encoder for volume and brightness display, a control button, a serial UART interface, and a speaker driver. The design still has one or two caveats: it’s designed to powered by USB, but [Conrad] notes that it draws more current than USB 2.0 can provide, though USB-C should be able to keep up.

On the software side, a Python program displays a cycle of three slides: local weather, regional weather, and a radar display. For the local and regional weather display graphics, [Conrad] created a static background image containing most of the graphics, and the program only generated the dynamic components. For the radar display, the regional map’s outlines come from Natural Earth, and a Python program overlays radar data on them.

We’ve seen other attempts at recreating the unique style of the WeatherStar system, but nothing quite beats the real thing.

youtube.com/embed/hUSNxKH7OT0?…

hackaday.com/2025/05/31/a-crt-…

La divisione russa del colosso tecnologico americano Microsoft si prepara alla bancarotta. La società “Microsoft Rus” ha notificato ufficialmente la sua intenzione di presentare una domanda corrispondente alla Corte arbitrale di Mosca tramite il portale “Fedresurs”.

La decisione di fallimento è stata la conclusione logica di un lungo periodo di controversie legali iniziato dopo l’uscita di Microsoft dal mercato russo nel marzo 2022. La società americana è stata tra le prime grandi aziende tecnologiche ad annunciare la cessazione delle operazioni in Russia a causa delle sanzioni internazionali.

Nei primi cinque mesi del 2025, le aziende russe hanno intentato quattro cause legali contro Microsoft Rus per un totale di circa 110 milioni di rubli. Si tratta di un aumento significativo rispetto agli anni precedenti: nel 2024 l’importo delle richieste era di soli 26,6 milioni di rubli, mentre nel 2023 ha raggiunto i 170 milioni.

Tra le aziende che chiedevano risarcimenti c’erano le più grandi società e banche russe. VTB, MegaFon, Gazprombank, Lenta, Severstal e Uralkali chiedono il rimborso delle somme spese per servizi che Microsoft non è più in grado di fornire. Le principali lamentele riguardano la fine improvvisa dei rinnovi degli abbonamenti aziendali a Microsoft 365, che comprende applicazioni per ufficio, servizi cloud e posta elettronica aziendale.

Ci sono già le prime decisioni giudiziarie: a febbraio, il tribunale ha ordinato a Microsoft Rus di pagare alla catena di vendita al dettaglio Lenta 16 milioni di rubli. I casi rimanenti sono in sospeso, ma le prospettive per la società americana appaiono cupe.

Microsoft ha definitivamente chiuso le sue attività in Russia, chiudendo filiali in 13 città, tra cui Mosca, San Pietroburgo, Ekaterinburg e Novosibirsk, a dicembre 2024 e gennaio 2025. L’azienda ha anche interrotto il supporto per i servizi cloud e per Skype Messenger, lasciando le organizzazioni russe senza supporto tecnico e aggiornamenti di sicurezza.

La situazione di Microsoft rientra in un processo più ampio di abbandono della Russia da parte delle aziende tecnologiche occidentali. Gli esperti hanno registrato un massiccio deflusso di aziende russe dalle e-mail aziendali di Google e Microsoft: nel corso di un anno, l’abbandono da Gmail è stato del 26% e da Outlook del 40%. Ciò ha creato serie sfide per le aziende russe, che sono state costrette a cercare alternative alle soluzioni tradizionali.

Il fallimento di Microsoft Rus potrebbe creare un precedente per altre aziende informatiche occidentali che hanno annunciato la loro partenza, lasciando però entità giuridiche in Russia con obblighi inadempiuti. La struttura Microsoft in Russia comprende altre tre società: Microsoft Development Center Rus, Microsoft Mobile Rus e Microsoft Payments Rus. Non è ancora noto se siano in programma iniziative simili.

Per gli utenti russi, la bancarotta significherebbe la fine definitiva di qualsiasi supporto per i prodotti Microsoft. Le aziende che utilizzano ancora software con licenza di uno sviluppatore americano saranno costrette a passare alle controparti russe o a cercare altre soluzioni. Il governo sta promuovendo attivamente la sostituzione delle importazioni nel settore IT, ma il processo di transizione verso piattaforme nazionali richiede tempo e risorse ingenti.

L'articolo Fallisce Microsoft in Russia: addio ufficiale dopo sanzioni e cause milionarie proviene da il blog della sicurezza informatica.

A treadmill-style bed can be a great addition to a 3D printer. It allows prints to be shifted out of the build volume as printing continues, greatly increasing the size and flexibility of what you can print. But [Ivan Miranda] and [Jón Schone] had a question. Instead of making a treadmill to suit a 3D printer, what if you just built a 3D printer on top of a full-size treadmill?

The duo sourced a piece of real gym equipment for this build. They then set about building a large-scale 3D printer on top of this platform. The linear rails were first mounted on to the treadmill’s frame, followed by a gantry for the print head itself and mounts for the necessary stepper motors. The printer also gained a custom extra-large extruder to ensure a satisfactory print speed that was suitable for the scale of the machine. From there, it was largely a case of fitting modules and running cables to complete the printer.

Soon enough, the machine was printing hot plastic on the treadmill surface, thereby greatly expanding the usable print volume. It’s a little tricky to wrap your head around at first, but when you see it in action, it’s easy to see the utility of a build like this, particularly at large scale. [Ivan] demonstrated this by printing a massive girder over two meters long.

We started seeing attempts at building a belt-equipped “infinite build volume” printer back in 2017, and it took awhile before the concept matured enough to be practical. Even today, they remain fairly uncommon.

youtube.com/embed/0rWxUpknTG0?…

hackaday.com/2025/05/31/making…

Il 9 febbraio avevo cancellato l'account Facebook, il sistema mi aveva detto che per 30 giorni sarebbe stato solo disattivato e che l'eliminazione vera e propria sarebbe avvenuta solo 30 giorni dopo.

Siamo al 30 maggio e il mio account è ancora lì.

Stasera sono nuovamente entrato e ho rifatto la procedura, al termine della quale il sistema mi ha ancora una volta confermato che la mia richiesta di cancellazione era stata ricevuta, che l'account era stato programmato per l'eliminazione ma che per 30 giorni sarebbe stato solo disattivato, casomai avessi cambiato idea.

Qualcuno di voi è riuscito a cancellarsi per davvero?

Nel frattempo ho scritto al Garante per la Privacy segnalando il problema e chiedendo come fare per poter vedere rispettato il mio diritto ad essere rimosso da quel social network.

Ho visto il primo episodio di Adolescence.

Non avrei mai dovuto farlo.

Dear Friend of Press Freedom,

It’s now the 66th day that Rümeysa Öztürk is facing deportation by the United States government for writing an op-ed it didn’t like. More press freedom news below.

Risking free speech won’t protect kids

Federal agencies are transforming into the speech police under President Donald Trump. So why are some Democrats supporting the Kids Online Safety Act, a recently reintroduced bill that would authorize the MAGA-controlled Federal Trade Commission to enforce censorship?

As Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) senior advocacy adviser Caitlin Vogus wrote for The Boston Globe, there’s never an excuse for supporting censorship bills, but especially when the political loyalists at the FTC are sure to abuse any power they’re given to stifle news on disfavored topics. Read the op-ed here.

We’re ready to sue if Paramount executives sell out the press

We’ve written previously about how Trump’s frivolous complaint against Paramount Global over CBS News’ editing of an interview with Kamala Harris threatens the freedoms of other news outlets. Yesterday, Trump proved it by claiming his $20 billion damages demand is based on “mental anguish” due to the answer – which doesn’t even mention him. How’s that for a “snowflake”?

As we informed Paramount Global executives last week, we plan to file a shareholder derivative lawsuit if Paramount settles. We believe any settlement – let alone the eight figure range being discussed – would be an effort to launder bribe money through the courts and would damage Paramount irreparably.

Reports this week in the Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, and elsewhere have noted that executives fear derivative liability if they settle. They should. Read more here.

Phone companies keep journalist surveillance secret

A letter by Sen. Ron Wyden about surveillance of senators’ phone lines has an important lesson for journalists, too: Be careful in selecting your phone carrier.

Wyden wrote his Senate colleagues revealing which wireless carriers inform customers about government surveillance requests (Cape, Google Fi, and US Mobile), and which don’t (AT&T, Boost Mobile, Charter/Spectrum, Comcast/Xfinity Mobile, T-Mobile, and Verizon). Read more here.

Fallout from silencing Voice of America

As a reporter on the press freedom beat, Liam Scott chronicled abuses against journalists for Voice of America. But now, Scott himself is part of the story.

In March, Trump signed an executive order gutting the United States Agency for Global Media, which oversees VOA. Scott and his colleagues have been or are set to be terminated imminently, and the website hasn’t published a new story in months.

We spoke to Scott about his unique perspective on current threats to press freedom, as both a victim and a journalist covering them. We were joined by Jason Scott of Archive Team, who is working to preserve VOA’s content should it be taken offline. Read more and watch the webinar here.

Administration abuses secrecy rules

Lauren Harper, FPF’s Daniel Ellsberg chair on government secrecy, joined MeidasTouch Network’s Legal AF podcast, “Court of History,” to explain how the Trump administration is abusing secrecy to control the news narrative — and how an FPF Freedom of Information Act win revealed the truth.

Harper was joined by University of Maryland professor Jason Baron in a wide-ranging discussion with co-hosts Sidney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz. Watch the video podcast here.

Federal police reforms repealed

The same week the Justice Department announced it was dropping federal oversight programs and investigations into more than two dozen police departments, including in Minneapolis, the city held a remembrance marking five years since the murder of George Floyd by a local police officer.

Police abuses of protestors and journalists during the demonstrations that followed Floyd’s murder led to the now-abandoned reforms, including consent decrees in Minneapolis and Louisville dealing with how police should interact with journalists covering protests and their aftermaths. The U.S. Press Freedom Tracker, a project of FPF, has more. Read the Tracker’s coverage here.

What we’re reading

Greene County policy barring staff from speaking to press ‘unconstitutional,’ experts say (The Daily Progress). Local government employees should be able to talk to the press. But in Greene County, Virginia, they can’t. We told The Daily Progress that the county policy is unconstitutional.

Journalist sues LA county, ex-LA county sheriff for criminally investigating her (The Dissenter). It’s good to see journalist Maya Lau stand up for journalists’ right to not be investigated and harassed for doing their jobs.

How to stand your ground, in three (not so easy) steps (American Crisis). Institutions shouldn’t cave to Trump’s threats. Thanks to Margaret Sullivan for citing our plans to sue if Paramount settles with Trump as an example on how to stand your ground.

FBI visits me over manifesto (Ken Klippenstein). Journalists’ sources and newsgathering are none of the FBI’s business. They don’t seriously think Klippenstein was some kind of conspirator — they just want to intimidate him and other journalists.

freedom.press/issues/risking-f…

As a reporter on the press freedom beat, Liam Scott chronicled abuses against journalists at home and abroad for Voice of America. But he was shocked when the experiences of those on the other side of the page became his own.

In March, President Donald Trump signed an executive order suddenly gutting the United States Agency for Global Media, which oversees VOA. Scott and hundreds of colleagues have been or are set to be terminated imminently, and the international news service’s website hasn’t published a new story in months.

To understand more about how Trump’s anti-press tactics threaten the independence of public-interest journalism and what comes next for press freedom in the U.S. and around the world, Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) hosted an online webinar May 23 with Scott and Archive Team Co-founder Jason Scott, who is working to preserve VOA’s content should it be taken offline.

youtube.com/embed/mPh-iQlQuMU?…

“After several years of covering press freedom issues, it still feels weird to be in the midst of a press freedom issue that is affecting me and my colleagues,” Liam Scott said. “There is actually a lot that is happening here that reminds me of what I’ve reported on in other countries.”

He also expressed significant concern for colleagues who are in the U.S. on visas. Without authorization to continue working here, they will be forced to return home to countries where austere rules about free speech can lead to jail time or worse, he cautioned.

“VOA has journalists now imprisoned in Myanmar, Vietnam, and Azerbaijan, and there are other journalists from Radio Free Europe and Radio Free Asia who are imprisoned in other countries around the world as well, just for doing their jobs,” Liam Scott said, referring to two other international news services long supported by the U.S. government. “So my immediate concern was if VOA and its sister outlets shut down, who is going to advocate for these reporters?”

Preserving VOA’s online content

While the fate of VOA’s employees hangs in the balance, so too does its website, a resource for readers who live in regions of censorship and can’t access this information anywhere else. Amid fears that the site and the reporting it hosts will vanish from the internet and leave behind thousands of stories, efforts are underway to preserve its contents.

Archive Team members, including Jason Scott, have created an “online footprint” of VOA’s website that contains over 400 gigabytes worth of stories. It’s paramount to ensure a replica of the site exists before its potential takedown, he said, because the work cannot be done retroactively.

“The conversation about whether or not to save something usually stops once it’s gone,” he added.

As a general rule of thumb, Jason Scott recommended that journalists keep multiple copies of their work in different locations, in the event they lose access to where their work is published.

Doing so is especially important in the current digital climate under the Trump administration, which has scrubbed countless federal webpages.

In that sense, said Jason Scott, it bears resemblance to a startup company.

“You move fast, you break things, you work it out later. If something can’t be explained to you in two seconds, get rid of it,” he added. This slash-and-burn approach, a Trump administration hallmark, can wreak havoc for preservation efforts because it evokes a digital “entropy” that can change data access on a dime, said Jason Scott.

While trawling internet data can be exhausting, so can reporting through censorship. Liam Scott, who has continued his work on the press freedom beat at outlets elsewhere, said it’s important “to not get fatigued” and to remember that threats and retaliation are often reactions to strong journalism, which underscores the need to protect the rights of those doing the work.

“Attacks on journalists are also attacks on the public,” he said. “Because when you’re attacking a journalist, you’re attacking the information that they’re trying to share with their audience — information that is so important for how we live our lives.”

Just as accountability is met with reprisal, archiving data is met with unpredictability. As the Archive Team compiles the work of countless VOA journalists who risked their lives to report the truth, Jason Scott said to remember that data preservation is an uphill battle. The power to decide what stays online often belongs to those with the most effective keys to the internet: powerful institutions like the government.

“Data is an incredible devil’s bargain,” he said. “Entropy is the house, and the house always wins.”

freedom.press/issues/silencing…

The following was a letter submitted by an anonymous Pirate supporter using the pseudonym “Forward Thoughts”, sharing critiques of “Uncle Sam”. This article is apart of the project “Message in a Bottle”, allowing supporters of the US Pirate Party to submit editorial articles to the United States Pirate Party website.

Uncle Sam, the personification of the federal government, is supposed to be a beacon of democracy and good fortune towards the will of the people right here in the United States of America. However, he has gotten too big for his britches since the beginning. History highlighting this goes as far back as Uncle Sam exerting his power from the Whiskey Rebellion to recently using the Enemy Alien Act of 1787 to deport immigrant dissenters speaking out against the genocide happening in Palestine.

Every state relies on his charity to a certain extent, some more than others. How can we rely on our government to provide for its people when it directly meddles and persistently goes against the will of its people by starting wars and cutting funds to social programs, sometimes it creates on its own volition?

In a way, the American people receive assistance from the suits and ties of Capitol Hill in Washington D.C., that assistance comes in the form of government regulations more so than it comes from funding assistance. Guns, voting, criminal penalties, taxes, immigration, etc. are always the hot button issues every politician or candidate running for office has on their agenda.

“I want to be controlled harder by my government” said no one ever.

In order to curtail exerting pragmatic force against the will of the people, there’s supposed to be a system our founding fathers put in place called “checks and balances.” How this works is there’s the executive branch consisting of the presidency and cabinet members, Congress which consists of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and the Supreme Court which consists of 9 justices.

However, what happens when all 3 branches reciprocate the same political ideology as one another? Who’s gonna stop these corrupt politicians from filling the coffers of themselves and of their allies (the oligarchy) they’re in cahoots with? Now we’re faced with a constitutional crisis where all 3 branches need to be severed like an infected limb.

Get this: Uncle Sam can exert his power over the economy on a whim. Right now President Trump is putting his hand up Uncle Sam as a puppet and he’s levying taxes on Chinese imports and other countries around the world. In retaliation, other countries he’s levied tariffs on are levying retaliatory tariffs against our imports into their countries. Consequently, prices on goods and services are rising. Stocks on the stock market are plummeting.

History is repeating itself. Remember back in US history class (well, hopefully you were taught this in US history class) about the Great Depression at the very end of the 1920s? Part of the reason why the economy went into a spiral was because of then Congress’s tariffs on foreign imports. Consumers no longer were able to afford products, therefore companies losing profits, especially those in the manufacturing industry, laid off workers.

Granted it wasn’t as if President Hoover bypassed Congress to make the tariffs happen, but my point still stands on how tariffs cause unintentional side effects to our everyday lives.

Lesson learned: tariffs backfire immensely on the economy.

Then President Nixon back in 1969 wanted to defund TV program PBS, Public Broadcasting Service. The nonprofit network was created to provide educational programming in a non-commercialized manner. It has brought us shows such as Sesame Street, Arthur, Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood, just to name a few.

Speaking of Mr. Rogers, he testified before Congress and managed to avert budget cuts for the nationally renowned TV station. Fast forward to present day 2025 — Republicans in Congress and President Trump are trying to cut funds for PBS. History is repeating itself yet again. Will we have a savior of PBS like we did back in 1969?

Lesson to be learned: PBS really is made possible by viewers like you.

Even at the state level, funding can be granted and cut based on the current majority party’s and governor’s ideology of that time. Pennhurst State School & Hospital in Spring City, PA is one of many examples of state government apathetic to the welfare of its people, especially a vulnerable population.

Opened in 1908 and closed in 1987, Pennhurst State School & Hospital was a product of an era of eugenics where those deemed unfit to reproduce in the Caucasian gene pool were euthanized or removed from society. Marginalized groups such as the epileptic and the mentally disabled were housed here, but soon grew to orphans, physically disabled, etc. Within a few years Pennhurst became overcrowded and conditions became deplorable.

In 1968, Bill Baldini did a 5-part segment on the conditions at Pennhurst exposing its wretched standard of living and abuse residents faced. There was a public outcry after the segment aired. Conditions seldomly improved from there on out until its closure in 1987. Fortunately, these residents were moved to boarding homes.

Have you ever heard of a Kirkbride psychiatric hospital? They’re long-term psychiatric hospitals designed in a batwing fashion with emphasis on natural light and air circulation. However, lack of funding and mismanagement had led to conditions in a handful of these facilities to be anything but cheery. In fact, it is what can easily be described as wicked.

Trenton Psychiatric Hospital in Trenton, NJ, under the direction of Dr. Henry Cotton, extracted organs and teeth from patients. In spite of high mortality rates and disprovable claims of cure rates, this persisted at the behest of Dr. Cotton during his tenure.

Philly (Philadelphia) State Hospital at Byberry opened in 1907. Unlike Trenton Psychiatric Hospital and others similar to Trenton, it was not made using the Kirkbride blueprints. This didn’t make the hospital any less susceptible to daunting conditions such as overcrowding, barbaric experiments, abuse, and neglect.

Props are in order to a conscientious objector named Charlie Lord, who between 1945 and 1946 was so appalled by the conditions he took note of that he covertly took photos and leaked them to the press. In these photos, raw sewage and naked men lined the hallways of Byberry.

Lesson to be learned: these residents were at the mercy of state politicians apathetic to their basic needs. Moreover and lastly, psychiatric hospitals such as the Kirkbride hospitals and disabled residential facilities such as Pennhurst are archaic and stunt personal psychiatric growth in patients.

Most states’ systems are designed to where property taxes fund our public schools. Back in the late 1800s, public schools were a shining gem of what America could be. Nowadays in many communities, our schools are nothing more than shadows of their former selves, meeting the minimum standards set by the state for funding.

Gone are the days of home economics and industrial shop classes. It’s all about standardized testing mandated by the state capital and even Uncle Sam, which is basically modern day phrenology. There’s educators and politicians who’ll justify this inane waste of paper by saying it measures how schools are doing with educating their students.

Standardized testing can be summed up in four words, it’s this: elite stay in control.

Lesson to be learned: standardized testing is a disease on our education system designed to punish lower socioeconomic schools and to keep those at the higher end of the socioeconomic.

uspirates.org/message-in-a-bot…

nugole.it/nugoletta/ju/p/17485…

Ju

2025-05-30 05:21:56

Questo è bello.
Storie di Verona: il brigante Falasco.

La torre Falasco è ancora in piedi, costruita in una specie di rientranza - coalo - in una delle molte falesie. Si vede facendo un po' di attenzione quando si risale la Valpantena, è sul lato a sinistra della valle venedo su da Verona.
Nell'articolo dice che s'è perso arrivandoci ma da quel che mi ricordo c'è una stradella abbastanza confortevole che porta su.

larena.it/rubriche/vi-cammino-…

La leggenda del Brigante Falasco. Bello e spietato, era il terrore della valle

I Balladoro, i Leonardi, i Tedeschi, gli Oliboni, i Benella di Laudi, i Rotari, i Padoani, gli Allegri… Perché dal passato riaffiorano... Scopri di più

^{Alessandro Anderloni (L'Arena)}