The European Commission will stop looking into whether Microsoft's hiring of Inflection AI staff breached EU merger rules after seven EU countries dropped their requests for an investigation, the EU executive said in a press release on Wednesday (18 September).

euractiv.com/section/competiti…

Over the years, we’ve figured out some pretty sure-fire ways to get hackers and makers motivated for contests. One of the best ways is to put arbitrary limits on different aspects of the project, such as how large it can be or how many power it can consume. Don’t believe us? Then just take a look at the entries of this year’s Tiny Games Contest.

Nearly 80 projects made it across the finish line this time, and our panel of judges have spent the last week or so going over each one to try and narrow it down to a handful of winners. We’ll start things off with the top three projects, each of which will be awarded a $150 gift certificate from our friends at DigiKey.

First: Sub-Surface Simon

While this contest saw a lot of excellent entries, we don’t think anyone is going to be surprised to see this one take the top spot. Earning an exceptionally rare perfect ten score from each of our judges, Sub-Surface Simon from [alnwlsn] grabbed onto the theme of this contest and ran like hell with it.

Exploiting the fact that many integrated circuits are actually far smaller than their external packages, [alnwlsn] milled away the inert plastic surrounding the DIP-14 version of the ATtiny84A, which left just enough room to install some LEDs and buttons. This means the complete game is housed within the boundaries of the chip itself — just plug it into a powered breadboard and get playing.

Second: Morse Quest

Coming in at second place is Morse Quest, from [felix]. Basically, [felix] took the classic text-based adventure game formula, and replaced the keyboard and monitor with a microswitch and an LED. Players not only need to correctly decode the flashing LED to figure out what the game is saying about their immediate environment, but they have to compose their response and key it in manually.

Always wanted to learn Morse code, but didn’t know how to get started? Well, this game probably isn’t it. While you can select the rate at which the same blinks out the game to make things a little easier on yourself, you’ll still need a pretty solid knowledge of Morse to explore very far.

Third: WS2812B Othello

Easily the most traditional game of the of the top three, this handheld Othello allows the player to challenge a computerized opponent on an 8×8 matrix of WS2812B LEDs. As the LED board is an off-the-shelf module, [Dave] was able to hide most of the main PCB’s electronics underneath it, giving the overall device a particularly clean look.

As nice as the hardware is, the software is equally impressive. Running on an 80 MHz STM32L412KBT6, [Dave] wrote the entire firmware without using any external libraries. Most of us would have been reaching for a common library just to get the hardware working, but he wrote everything from the button debounce routines to the actual logic by which the game is played.

Honorable Mentions

There’s no way we can pick just three of these incredible projects to showcase, so as usual, we have a few additional categories for entries that really stood out to the judges.

One Dimensional: For this category we wanted to get people thinking about what they could do with a common addressable LED strip, and T1Duino from [Andrea Trentini] didn’t disappoint. This large-format game re-imagines Tetris in a single dimension by focusing on the colors of the falling blocks instead of their shapes. But we’ve also got to give credit to [senily64dx], who really thumbed their nose at this one. Zero Dimensional PONG recreates the classic game with just a single LED. The players are meant to interpret the changing brightness of the LED as it moving closer or farther away from them, and time their button presses accordingly.

The Classics: This category was devoted to entries that brought back the iconic games of yesteryear, so it’s little surprise that the judges singled out this miniature Space Invaders arcade cabinet from [Nick Cranch] as a prime example. Just one classic game not enough? Then take a look at the μRetro from [bobricius]. This gorgeous handheld uses ATtiny85 cartridges that let’s you swap between a collection of arcade standards.

The Controls: Nintendo has spent the last couple of decades proving that how players interact with the hardware can be just as important as the games themselves, and these entries are no different. Salsa ONE by [Alex] is a minimalistic handheld that you play with just a single button, while Blind Maze from [penumbriel] tasks the player with navigating an invisible maze using an interface consisting of a trio of buttons and LEDs.

Pocket Arcade: Each judge agreed that, as far as being pocket-friendly, the Wibraboy was the project to beat. By repurposing the enclosure from a cheapo handheld game, [x3e] was able to give their DIY recreation a remarkably professional look. For those with even smaller pockets, the Tiny OLED by [deʃhipu] offers up classic gameplay in an exceptionally small footprint.

Fancy!: Finally, this category was devoted to the most polished and professional looking builds. Among all the projects, the LED Matrix Arcade from [Ryan Shill] may be the most attractive of the bunch. With its vibrant 32×32 LED array and walnut enclosure, it’s a build we’d be proud to have on display at home. The all-digital Mini Virtual Pinball Cabinet created by [mircemk] was also a favorite for this category, as it does an excellent job of recreating the authentic pinball look with a sideways-mounted 17 inch monitor.

Shall We Play a Game?

There’s only so many projects we can call out individually, so we strongly recommend you head over to Hackaday.io and browse all of the incredible entries into this contest. There’s some truly impressive work in there, and we’re willing to bet you’ll find something in there that will help inspire your own projects.

We’d like to thank DigiKey for helping to make this contest possible, and of course the Hackaday community for consistently rising to our latest challenge. Speaking of which, you’ve still got some time before the deadline to submit your best Simple Supercon Add-On for our latest contest.

You normally don’t think a lot would go into the construction of a chair. However, when that chair is attached to a commercial jet plane, there’s a lot of technology that goes into making sure they are safe. According to a recent BBC article, testing involves crash dummies and robot arms.

Admittedly, these are first-class and business-class seats. Robots do repetitive mundane tasks like opening and closing the tray table many, many times. They also shoot the seats with crash dummies aboard at up to 16 Gs of acceleration. Just to put that into perspective, a jet pilot ejecting gets about the same amount of force. A MiG-35 pilot might experience 10 G.

We didn’t realize how big the airline seat industry is in Northern Ireland. Thompson, the company that has the lab in question, is only one of the companies in the country that builds seats. Apparently, the industry suffered from the global travel slowdown during the pandemic but is now bouncing back.

While people worry about robots taking jobs, we can’t imagine anyone wanting to spend all day returning their tray table to the upright and locked position repeatedly. We certainly don’t want to be 16 G crash dummies, either.

Crash dummies have a long history, of course. Be glad airliners don’t feature ejector seats.

hackaday.com/2024/09/18/airlin…

Down here at the bottom of our ocean of air, it’s easy to get complacent about the hazards our universe presents. We feel safe from the dangers of the vacuum of space, where radiation sizzles and rocks whizz around. In the same way that a catfish doesn’t much care what’s going on above the surface of his pond, so too are we content that our atmosphere will deflect, absorb, or incinerate just about anything that space throws our way.

Or will it? We all know that there are things out there in the solar system that are more than capable of wiping us out, and every day holds a non-zero chance that we’ll take the same ride the dinosaurs took 65 million years ago. But if that’s not enough to get you going, now we have to worry about gamma-ray bursts, searing blasts of energy crossing half the universe to arrive here and dump unimaginable amounts of energy on us, enough to not only be measurable by sensitive instruments in space but also to effect systems here on the ground, and in some cases, to physically alter our atmosphere.

Gamma-ray bursts are equal parts fascinating physics and terrifying science fiction. Here’s a look at the science behind them and the engineering that goes into detecting and studying them.

Collapsars and Neutron Stars

Although we now know that gamma-ray bursts are relatively common, it wasn’t all that long ago that we were ignorant of their existence, thanks in part to our thick, protective atmosphere. The discovery of GRBs had to wait for the Space Race to couple with Cold War paranoia, which resulted in Project Vela, a series of early US Air Force satellites designed in part to watch for Soviet compliance with the Partial Test Ban Treaty, which forbade everything except underground nuclear tests. In 1967, gamma ray detectors on satellites Vela 3 and Vela 4 saw a flash of gamma radiation that didn’t match the signature of any known nuclear weapon. Analysis of the data from these and subsequent flashes revealed that they came from space, and the race to understand these energetic cosmic outbursts was on.
Trust, but verify. Vela 4, designed to monitor Soviet nuclear testing, was among the first satellites to detect cosmic gamma-ray bursts. Source: ENERGY.GOV, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Gamma-ray bursts are the most energetic phenomena known, with energies that are almost unfathomable. Their extreme brightness, primarily as gamma rays but across the spectrum and including visible light, makes them some of the most distant objects ever observed. To put their energetic nature into perspective, a GRB in 2008, dubbed GRB 080319B, was bright enough in the visible part of the spectrum to just be visible to the naked eye even though it was 7.5 billion light years away. That’s more than halfway across the observable universe, 3,000 times farther away than the Andromeda galaxy, normally the farthest naked-eye visible object.

For all their energy, GRBs tend to be very short-lived. GRBs break down into two rough groups. Short GRBs last for less than about two seconds, with everything else falling into the long GRB category. About 70% of GRBs we see fall into the long category, but that might be due to the fact that the short bursts are harder to see. It could also be that the events that precipitate the long variety, hypernovae, or the collapse of extremely massive stars and the subsequent formation of rapidly spinning black holes, greatly outnumber the progenitor event for the short category of GRBs, which is the merging of binary neutron stars locked in a terminal death spiral.

The trouble is, the math doesn’t work out; neither of these mind-bogglingly energetic events could create a burst of gamma rays bright enough to be observed across half the universe. The light from such a collapse would spread out evenly in all directions, and the tyranny of the inverse square law would attenuate the signal into the background long before it reached us. Unless, of course, the gamma rays were somehow collimated. The current thinking is that a disk of rapidly spinning material called an accretion disk develops outside the hypernova or the neutron star merger. The magnetic field of this matter is tortured and twisted by its rapid rotation, with magnetic lines of flux getting tangled and torn until they break. This releases all the energy of the hypernova or neutron star merger in the form of gamma rays in two tightly focused jets aligned with the pole of rotation of the accretion disk. And if one of those two jets happens to be pointed our way, we’ll see the resulting GRB.

youtube.com/embed/rofLQgMxM78?…

Crystals and Shadows

But how exactly do we detect gamma-ray bursts? The first trick is to get to space, or at least above the bulk of the atmosphere. Our atmosphere does a fantastic job shielding us from all forms of cosmic radiation, which is why the field of gamma-ray astronomy in general and the discovery of GRBs in particular had to wait until the 1960s. A substantial number of GRBs have been detected by gamma-ray detectors carried aloft on high-altitude balloons, especially in the early days, but most dedicated GRB observatories are now satellite-borne

Gamma-ray detection technology has advanced considerably since the days of Vela, but a lot of the tried and true technology is still used today. Scintillation detectors, for example, use crystals that release photons of visible light when gamma rays of a specific energy pass through them. The photons can then be amplified by photomultiplier tubes, resulting in a pulse of current proportional to the energy of the incident gamma ray. This is the technology used by the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) aboard the Fermi Gamma-Ray Space Telescope, a satellite that was launched in 2008. Sensors with the GBT are mounted around the main chassis of Fermi, giving it a complete very of the sky. It consists of twelve sodium iodide detectors, each of which is directly coupled to a 12.7-cm diameter photomultiplier tube. Two additional sensors are made from cylindrical bismuth germanate scintillators, each of which is sandwiched between two photomultipliers. Together, the fourteen sensors cover from 8 keV to 30 MeV, and used in concert they can tell where in the sky a gamma-ray burst has occurred.
The coded aperture for Swift’s BAT. Each tiny lead square casts a unique shadow pattern on the array of cadmiun-zinc-telluride (CZT) ionization sensors, allowing an algorithm to work out the characteristics of the gamma rays falling on it. Source: NASA.
Ionization methods are also used as gamma-ray detectors. The Niel Gehrels Swift Observatory, a dedicated GRB hunting satellite that was launched in 2004, has an instrument known as the Burst Alert Telescope, or BAT. This instrument has a very large field of view and is intended to monitor a huge swath of sky. It uses 32,768 cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) detector elements, each 4 x 4 x 2 mm, to directly detect the passage of gamma rays. CZT is a direct-bandgap semiconductor in which electron-hole pairs are formed across an electric field when hit by ionizing radiation, producing a current pulse. The CZT array sits behind a fan-shaped coded aperture, which has thousands of thin lead tiles arranged in an array that looks a little like a QR code. Gamma rays hit the coded aperture first, casting a pattern on the CZT array below. The pattern is used to reconstruct the original properties of the radiation beam mathematically, since conventional mirrors and lenses don’t work with gamma radiation. The BAT is used to rapidly detect the location of a GRB and to determine if it’s something worth looking at. If it is, it rapidly slews the spacecraft to look at the burst with its other instruments and instantly informs other gamma observatories about the source so they can take a look too.

The B.O.A.T.

On October 9, 2022, both Swift and Fermi, along with dozens of other spacecraft and even some ground observatories, would get to witness a cataclysmically powerful gamma-ray burst. Bloodlessly named GRB 221009A but later dubbed “The BOAT,” for “brightest of all time,” the initial GRB lasted for an incredible ten minutes with a signal that remained detectable for hours. Coming from the direction of the constellation Sagittarius from a distance of 2.4 billion light years, the burst was powerful enough to saturate Fermi’s sensors and was ten times more powerful than any signal yet received by Swift.
The BOAT. A ten-hour time-lapse of data from the Fermi Large Area Telescope during GRB 221009A on October 8, 2022. Source: NASA/DOE/Fermi LAT Collaboration, Public domain
Almost everything about the BOAT is fascinating, and the superlatives are too many to list. The gamma-ray burst was so powerful that it showed up in the scientific data of spacecraft that aren’t even equipped with gamma-ray detectors, including orbiters at Mars and Voyager 1. Ground-based observatories noted the burst, too, with observatories in Russia and China noting very high-energy photons in the range of tens to hundreds of TeV arriving at their detectors.

The total energy released by GRB 221009A is hard to gauge with precision, mainly because it swamped the very instruments designed to measure it. Estimates range from 10⁴⁸ to 10⁵⁰ joules, either of which dwarfs the total output of the Sun over its entire 10 billion-year lifespan. So much energy was thrown in our direction in such a short timespan that even our own atmosphere was impacted. Lightning detectors in India and Germany were triggered by the burst, and the ionosphere suddenly started behaving as if a small solar flare had just occurred. Most surprising was that the ionospheric effects showed up on the daylight side of the Earth, swamping the usual dampening effect of the Sun.

When the dust had settled from the initial detection of GRB 221009A, the question remained: What happened to cause such an outburst? To answer that, the James Webb Space Telescope was tasked with peering into space, off in the direction of Sagittarius, where it found pretty much what was expected — the remains of a massive supernova. In fact, the supernova that spawned this GRB doesn’t appear to have been particularly special when compared to other supernovae from similarly massive stars, which leaves the question of how the BOAT got to be so powerful.

Does any of this mean that a gamma-ray burst is going to ablate our atmosphere and wipe us out next week? Probably not, and given that this recent outburst was estimated to be a one-in-10,000-year event, we’re probably good for a while. It seems likely that there’s plenty that we don’t yet understand about GRBs, and that the data from GRB 221009A will be pored over for decades to come. It could be that we just got lucky this time, both in that we were in the right place at the right time to see the BOAT, and that it didn’t incinerate us in the process. But given that on average we see one GRB per day somewhere in the sky, chances are good that we’ll have plenty of opportunities to study these remarkable events.

hackaday.com/2024/09/18/catchi…

Da ieri, la percezione degli attacchi alla supply chain è cambiata radicalmente.

Non si tratta più solo di proteggere i dati, ma di garantire la sicurezza fisica delle persone. Gli eventi di ieri hanno evidenziato come la manipolazione dei dispositivi possa mettere a rischio la vita umana, trasformando la tecnologia in un’arma silenziosa e invisibile. Questo ci fa comprendere come la sicurezza informatica e quella fisica siano ora profondamente interconnesse, e il prezzo dell’inazione non è più solo la perdita di informazioni, ma la perdita di vite umane

Da quanto è stato riportato da alcuni media, all’interno dei dispositivi esplosi agli Hezbollah, sono state impiantate delle schede con dell’esplosivo in fase di produzione.

La vicenda rappresenta uno degli attacchi più significativi in termini di penetrazione delle reti di comunicazione di Hezbollah, e ha sollevato numerosi interrogativi sulla vulnerabilità delle forniture elettroniche destinate a gruppi militanti.

Manomissioni in fase di produzione

Secondo fonti di intelligence citate da Reuters, il Mossad avrebbe orchestrato un sabotaggio su larga scala inserendo esplosivi all’interno di migliaia di cercapersone ordinati da Hezbollah e fabbricati in Taiwan. Gli esplosivi sono stati inseriti durante la fase di produzione o di spedizione, rendendo i dispositivi quasi impossibili da distinguere dai normali cercapersone. Questi ordigni sarebbero stati progettati per detonare in risposta alla ricezione di specifici messaggi codificati inviati ai dispositivi.

Hezbollah aveva optato per l’utilizzo di cercapersone, in quanto considerati un’alternativa più sicura rispetto agli smartphone, ritenuti facilmente tracciabili dai servizi segreti israeliani. Tuttavia, questo incidente dimostra come anche tecnologie più semplici possano essere compromesse in maniera sofisticata. Il sabotaggio ha provocato un’esplosione simultanea dei dispositivi, causando un numero significativo di vittime, inclusi combattenti e affiliati del gruppo.

Una pianificazione da Stato

Le fonti vicine alla vicenda hanno riferito che il piano è stato attentamente orchestrato nei mesi precedenti, sfruttando l’ordinazione in blocco dei cercapersone da parte di Hezbollah. Questi dispositivi, prodotti dalla compagnia taiwanese Gold Apollo, erano destinati a migliorare la comunicazione tra i membri del gruppo, soprattutto in aree come Libano e Siria. Tuttavia, la loro alterazione a livello di produzione o spedizione ha trasformato questi strumenti di comunicazione in vere e proprie bombe a orologeria.

Gold Apollo ha negato qualsiasi coinvolgimento diretto nella manipolazione dei dispositivi, sottolineando che i cercapersone fabbricati erano stati venduti attraverso canali regolari e che non avevano il controllo su ciò che accadeva dopo la spedizione. L’azienda ha dichiarato di non essere responsabile per l’uso improprio dei suoi prodotti e ha puntato il dito verso la possibilità che i dispositivi siano stati sabotati durante il trasporto o in altre fasi della supply chain.

L’utilizzo del PETN

Questa operazione rappresenta un esempio clamoroso di attacco alla supply chain, in cui l’infiltrazione dei sistemi avviene prima che i dispositivi raggiungano i loro destinatari finali. L’uso di esplosivi miniaturizzati, come il PETN, inseriti all’interno dei vani batteria dei cercapersone, è stato identificato come la modalità principale con cui è stato attuato il sabotaggio. La possibilità che tali esplosivi possano essere detonati a distanza tramite un segnale radio codificato evidenzia l’elevato livello tecnologico raggiunto dall’intelligence israeliana.

La reazione di Hezbollah non si è fatta attendere: il gruppo ha subito accusato Israele di essere responsabile dell’attacco, e ha promesso vendetta. L’episodio ha inasprito ulteriormente le tensioni tra Israele e Hezbollah, rafforzando la percezione che il Mossad sia capace di colpire in profondità le infrastrutture e le comunicazioni del gruppo militante.

Questo scenario di sabotaggio tecnologico apre nuovi interrogativi sul futuro della sicurezza nelle comunicazioni per gruppi come Hezbollah, e pone l’accento sui rischi associati agli attacchi alla supply chain, una tecnica che sta diventando sempre più sofisticata e devastante. La vicenda potrebbe avere importanti implicazioni geopolitiche, non solo in Medio Oriente ma anche a livello internazionale, considerando l’utilizzo di tecnologie civili per fini militari.

L'articolo Supply Chain del Terrore! I Cercapersone Manomessi in fase di Produzione e Spedizione proviene da il blog della sicurezza informatica.

slowforward.net/2024/09/18/rom…

un libro straordinario! non mancate!

slowforward

2024-09-18 07:31:44

sabato 21 settembre 2024, alle ore 18:00
presso lo Studio Campo Boario
viale del Campo Boario 4/a (metro Piramide), Roma

presentazione di
LIBRO DELLA NATURA E DEL CONTINUO
di MARIO CORTICELLI

edizioni déclic, 2024

dialoga con l’autore
Marco Giovenale

cliccare per ingrandire

evento facebook:
facebook.com/events/1255159909…

IL LIBRO
Con un titolo quasi secentesco, il libro della natura e del continuo funziona da prosecuzione di alcune ossessioni testuali di Mario Corticelli, già godibili nei suoi precedenti lavori: una su tutte quella per i fenomeni naturali e gli animali e il loro mondo, meticolosamente de-antropomorfizzato. Oppure il ricorso a un tagliente registro ironico, se non addirittura di scherzo-scherno, diretto tanto al contesto degli umani quanto agli scambi linguistici che questi istituiscono: «e poi si odono feste di mercato / con gioia di genti / nel crollo dei prezzi di mercato / con una qualche distruzione delle genti / perlunga la strada che è lucente / che bello che è il linguaggio delle genti / con una qualche distruzione del linguaggio».
Impossibile non vedere nell’intelligenza di simili soluzioni, e di tante altre nel libro, un segno di quella traccia caustica beffarda e insieme paradossalmente leggera – di cui Corticelli è erede/innovatore – che rimonta al nome di Corrado Costa: «petizione per la diffusione dei boschi anche nelle foreste / petizione per la diffusione dei pini anche negli abeti dei boschi / petizione per la diffusione degli aghi anche negli aghi».
In definitiva, questo De rerum natura giocosissimo – che sposta sempre di lato, in un angolo bizzarro e in nuovi inciampi il caosmos che descrive – si disimpegna dal ruolo di riprodurre paesaggi, bestie, regole, mappe e tassonomie, e semmai disorienta con gran gusto quel che pensavamo essere una stabile visione delle cose, talvolta disturbando le immagini naturali come farebbe un programma di intelligenza artificiale: «un cervo. presenta un eccesso di denti che gli sporgono dai fianchi e dal dorso, che ce lo fanno immaginare già mangiato dall’interno, morto tuttavia chi lo ha mangiato. nei pressi di un burrone, esterno».

L’AUTORE
Mario Corticelli ha pubblicato testi poetici nelle antologie RZZZZZ! (Transeuropa Edizioni) e Àkusma (Metauro Edizioni) e su numerose riviste, fra cui Versodove, Nioques, OEI. Un modo (gammm.org) è del 2011. Tra il 2014 e il 2015 sono usciti due libri e un ebook legati in una trilogia aperta: Aria (comunione) (IkonaLíber, 2014), la sezione aria della serie mille idilli (gammm.org, 2014) e Costruzione di un animale (Arcipelago Edizioni, 2015). Del 2018 è Qualche parte del cane (Tic Edizioni). Su gammm.org e su pontebianco.noblogs.org è possibile leggere prose da sottrarre il bambino (2024).

declicedizioni.it/prodotto/lib…

slowforward.net/2024/09/18/rom…

#000000 #999999 #CorradoCosta #Corticelli #déclic #ironia #LibroDellaNaturaEDelContinuo #MarioCorticelli #poesia #prosa #ProsaInProsa

libro della natura e del continuo - declic edizioni

20 settembre 2024

^{déclic edizioni di carlo sperduti}

slowforward.net/2024/09/18/mon…

slowforward

2024-09-18 06:31:09

cliccare per ingrandire

fotografia di Nerina Toci

slowforward.net/2024/09/18/mon…

#DavideDiMaggio #foto #fotografia #JuliaBornefeld #MaurizioCaldirolaArteContemporanea #MCAC #mostra #NerinaToci

monza, 26 settembre: mostra di julia bornefeld e nerina toci, “nel puro nero”

Visita l'articolo per saperne di più.

^slowforward

slowforward.net/2024/09/18/fra…

slowforward

2024-09-18 00:27:46

video.wordpress.com/embed/Ws1O…
instagram.com/p/B180oEAIhxN/
youtu.be/c1OpIX2B48w?si=0QNlDB…

slowforward.net/2024/09/18/fra…

#111 #bribes #cinema #EnricoGhezzi #film #frammenti #pezzi

matango | archives&broadcast on Instagram: "È martedì, è settembre. Abbiamo lasciato Venezia poche ore fa. Fuori lampi e tuoni. Tempesta in arrivo. Mentre leggete decine di mani dietro questo schermo premono lettere per tessere fila verso direzioni dispar

72 likes, 13 comments - matango.tv on September 3, 2019: "È martedì, è settembre. Abbiamo lasciato Venezia poche ore fa. Fuori lampi e tuoni. Tempesta in arrivo.

^Instagram

slowforward.net/2024/09/17/ant…

slowforward

2024-09-17 13:41:25

youtu.be/e8BhVISIMgE?si=iG-mUm…

slowforward.net/2024/09/17/ant…

#Ale #AlessandroBroggi #lIntervallo #LIntervalloDiAntonioSyxty #prosa #ProsaInProsa #scritturaDiRicerca #scrittureDiRicerca

antonio syxty legge alessandro broggi (‘l’intervallo’ n. 400)

Visita l'articolo per saperne di più.

^slowforward

slowforward.net/2024/09/17/qua…

slowforward

2024-09-17 08:01:37

mtmteatro.it/marco-giovenale-n…

slowforward.net/2024/09/17/qua…

#blog #ELR #EsisteLaRicerca #ManifattureTeatraliMilanesi #MTM #MTMManifattureTeatraliMilanesi #Napoli #notille #report #testiDiMgInRete #testiDiMgOnline

quasi-report & notille personali su ‘esiste la ricerca’, napoli, settembre 2024

Visita l'articolo per saperne di più.

^slowforward