Ahead of the European Union's Regulation on Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising, Google's Ad Transparency Center no longer shows political ads from any countries in the EU.
Ahead of the European Unionx27;s Regulation on Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising, Googlex27;s Ad Transparency Center no longer shows political ads from any countries in the EU.#advertising #Google
Google Just Removed Seven Years of Political Advertising History from 27 Countries
Google’s Ad Transparency tool no longer shows political online advertisements that ran on its platforms, in the past or present, from any countries in the European Union, making seven years of data from 27 different countries inaccessible.Liz Carolan, who publishes Irish technology and politics newsletter The Briefing, spotted the change on September 28. Carolan noticed that until last week, Google’s Ad Transparency tool would allow visitors to search ads that have run in countries in the EU going back to 2018, including data about who was targeted, how much was spent on each ad, and for what candidates or parties. This week, political ads from Ireland as well as the other 26 countries in the EU are gone from the Ad Transparency political ads country selection page.
“We had been told that Google would try to stop people placing political ads, a ‘ban’ that was to come into effect this week. I did not read anywhere that this would mean the erasure of this archive of our political history,” Carolan wrote.
The change is in response to the EU’s upcoming Regulation on Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA), a law set to enter full force on October 10. The TTPA lays out new regulations for advertisers in the EU, including requirements that political ads “must be clearly labelled as such and include information on who paid for it, to which election, referendum, legislative or regulatory process it is linked and whether targeting or ad-delivery techniques have been used,” according to an EU summary of the law, and limits targeting and ad delivery of political advertising to strict conditions, including requiring consent from ads’ targets that their data be used for political advertising. Certain categories of demographic data, like racial or ethnic origin or political opinions, can’t be used for profiling by advertisers.
On August 5, Google posted new guidelines for political ads in EU countries, and said that past ads would still be accessible in the Transparency Center: “As of September 2025, the EU Political Ads Transparency report will be no longer available. However, EU Election Ads previously shown in the Political Ads Transparency Report will remain publicly accessible in the Ads Transparency Center, subject to retention policies.”
In July, Meta also announced it would no longer allow “political, electoral and social issue ads” on its platforms in the EU, “given the unworkable requirements and legal uncertainties” introduced by the TTPA. Past ads from the EU are still visible on Meta’s ad library.
The law dictates that online ads will be available in “an online European repository,” but that repository hasn’t launched yet. Researchers and journalists rely on tools like Google’s Ad Transparency platform and Meta’s similar platform for information on who was running political ads and how; now, they’ll have to wait for that repository to launch.
Google announced in November 2024 that it would stop serving political ads in the EU in October 2025, ahead of the TTPA. “Additionally, paid political promotions, where they qualify as political ads under the TTPA, will no longer be permitted on YouTube in the EU,” Google’s Vice President for Government Affairs and Public Policy for Europe Annette Kroeber-Riel wrote in a company blog post.
“The European Union’s upcoming Regulation on Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) unfortunately introduces significant new operational challenges and legal uncertainties for political advertisers and platforms,” Kroeber-Riel wrote. “For example, the TTPA defines political advertising so broadly that it could cover ads related to an extremely wide range of issues that would be difficult to reliably identify at scale. There is also a lack of reliable local election data permitting consistent and accurate identification of all ads related to any local, regional or national election across any of 27 EU Member States. And key technical guidance may not be finalized until just months before the regulation comes into effect.” The law is vague, but doesn’t specifically require platforms to delete past ads. It’s likely that many of the ads stored by Google in the Transparency Center would be in violation of the law today, however; instead of combing through hundreds of thousands of ads, it’s possible Google just removed the entire EU.
Google did not respond to 404 Media’s request for comment.
playlist.megaphone.fm?p=TBIEA2…An update on political advertising in the European Union
Google will stop serving political advertising in the EU ahead of new regulation in October 2025.Annette Kroeber-Riel (Google)
Lawyers blame IT, family emergencies, their own poor judgment, their assistants, illness, and more.#AI #Lawyers #law
18 Lawyers Caught Using AI Explain Why They Did It
Earlier this month, an appeals court in California issued a blistering decision and record $10,000 fine against a lawyer who submitted a brief in which “nearly all of the legal quotations in plaintiff’s opening brief, and many of the quotations in plaintiff’s reply brief, are fabricated” through the use of ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Grok. The court said it was publishing its opinion “as a warning” to California lawyers that they will be held responsible if they do not catch AI hallucinations in their briefs.In that case, the lawyer in question “asserted that he had not been aware that generative AI frequently fabricates or hallucinates legal sources and, thus, he did not ‘manually verify [the quotations] against more reliable sources.’ He accepted responsibility for the fabrications and said he had since taken measures to educate himself so that he does not repeat such errors in the future.”
As the judges remark in their opinion, the use of generative AI by lawyers is now everywhere, and when it is used in ways that introduce fake citations or fake evidence, it is bogging down courts all over America (and the world). For the last few months, 404 Media has been analyzing dozens of court cases around the country in which lawyers have been caught using generative AI to craft their arguments, generate fictitious citations, generate false evidence, cite real cases but misinterpret them, or otherwise take shortcuts that has introduced inaccuracies into their cases. Our main goal was to learn more about why lawyers were using AI to write their briefs, especially when so many lawyers have been caught making errors that lead to sanctions and that ultimately threaten their careers and their standings in the profession.
To do this, we used a crowdsourced database of AI hallucination cases maintained by the researcher Damien Charlotin, which so far contains more than 410 cases worldwide, including 269 in the United States. Charlotin’s database is an incredible resource, but it largely focuses on what happened in any individual case and the sanctions against lawyers, rather than the often elaborate excuses that lawyers told the court when they were caught. Using Charlotin’s database as a starting point, we then pulled court records from around the country for dozens of cases where a lawyer offered a formal explanation or apology. Pulling this information required navigating clunky federal and state court record systems and finding and purchasing the specific record where the lawyer in question tried to explain themselves (these were often called “responses to order to show cause.”) We also reached out to lawyers who were sanctioned for using AI to ask them why they did it. Very few of them responded, but we have included explanations from the few who did.
What we found was incredibly fascinating, and reveals a mix of lawyers blaming IT issues, personal and family emergencies, their own poor judgment and carelessness, and demands from their firms and the industry to be more productive and take on more casework. But most often, they simply blame their assistants.
Few dispute that the legal industry is under great pressure to use AI. Legal giants like Westlaw and LexisNexis have pitched bespoke tools to law firms that are now regularly being used, but Charlotin’s database makes clear that lawyers are regularly using off-the-shelf generalized tools like ChatGPT and Gemini as well. There’s a seemingly endless number of startups selling AI legal tools that do research, write briefs, and perform other legal tasks. While working on this article, it became nearly impossible to keep up with new cases of lawyers being sanctioned for using AI. Charlotin has documented 11 new cases within the last week alone.
This article is the first of several 404 Media will write exploring the use of AI in the legal profession. If you’re a lawyer and have thoughts or firsthand experiences, please get in touch. Some of the following anecdotes have been lightly edited for clarity.
💡
Are you a lawyer or do you work in the legal industry? We want to know how AI is impacting the industry, your firm, and your job. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at jason.404. Otherwise, send me an email at jason@404media.co.A lawyer in Indiana blames the court (Fake case cited)
A judge stated that the lawyer “took the position that the main reason for the errors in his brief was the short deadline (three days) he was given to file it. He explained that, due to the short timeframe and his busy schedule, he asked his paralegal (who once was, but is not currently, a licensed attorney) to draft the brief, and did not have time to carefully review the paralegal's draft before filing it.”
A lawyer in New York blamed vertigo, head colds, and malware
"He acknowledges that he used Westlaw supported by Google Co-Pilot which is an artificial intelligence-based tool as preliminary research aid." The lawyer “goes on to state that he had no idea that such tools could fabricate cases but acknowledges that he later came to find out the limitation of such tools. He apologized for his failure to identify the errors in his affirmation, but partly blames ‘a serious health challenge since the beginning of this year which has proven very persistent which most of the time leaves me internally cold, and unable to maintain a steady body temperature which causes me to be dizzy and experience bouts of vertigo and confusion.’ The lawyer then indicates that after finding about the ‘citation errors’ in his affirmation, he conducted a review of his office computer system and found out that his system was ‘affected by malware and unauthorized remote access.’ He says that he compared the affirmation he prepared on April 9, 2025, to the affirmation he filed to [the court] on April 21, 2025, and ‘was shocked that the cases I cited were substantially different.’”
A lawyer in Florida blames a paralegal and the fact they were doing the case pro bono (Fake cases and hallucinated quotes)
The lawyer “explained that he was handling this appeal pro bono and that as he began preparing the brief, he recognized that he lacked experience in appellate law. He stated that at his own expense, he hired ‘an independent contractor paralegal to assist in drafting the answer brief.’ He further explained that upon receipt of a draft brief from the paralegal, he read it, finalized it, and filed it with this court. He admitted that he ‘did not review the authority cited within the draft answer brief prior to filing’ and did not realize it contained AI generated content.
A lawyer in South Carolina said he was rushing (Fake cases generated by Microsoft CoPilot)
“Out of haste and a naïve understanding of the technology, he did not independently verify the sources were real before including the citations in the motion filed with the Court seeking a preliminary injunction”
A lawyer in Hawaii blames a New Yorker they hired
This lawyer was sanctioned $100 by a court for one AI-generated case, as well as quoting multiple real cases and misattributing them to that fake case. They said they had hired a per-diem attorney—“someone I had previously worked with and trusted,” they told the court—to draft the case, and though they “did not personally use AI in this case, I failed to ensure every citation was accurate before filing the brief.” The Honolulu Civil Beat reported that the per-diem attorney they hired was from New York, and that they weren’t sure if that attorney had used AI or not.
The lawyer told us over the phone that the news of their $100 sanction had blown up in their district thanks to that article. “ I was in court yesterday, and of course the [opposing] attorney somehow brought this up,” they said in a call. According to them, that attorney has also used AI in at least seven cases. Nearly every lawyer is using AI to some degree, they said; it’s just a problem if they get caught. “The judges here have seen it extensively. I know for a fact other attorneys have been sanctioned. It’s public, but unless you know what to search for, you’re not going to find it anywhere. It’s just that for some stupid reason, my matter caught the attention of a news outlet. It doesn’t help with business.”
A lawyer in Arizona blames someone they hired
A judge wrote “this is a case where the majority of authorities cited were either fabricated, misleading, or unsupported. That is egregious … this entire litigation has been derailed by Counsel’s actions. The Opening Brief was replete with citation-related deficiencies, including those consistent with artificial intelligence generated hallucinations.”
The attorney claimed “Neither I nor the supervising staff attorney knowingly submitted false or non-existent citations to the Court. The brief writer in question was experienced and credentialed, and we relied on her professionalism and prior performance. At no point did we intend to mislead the Court or submit citations not grounded in valid legal authority.”
A lawyer in Louisiana blames Westlaw (a legal research tool)
The lawyer “acknowledge[d] the cited authorities were inaccurate and mistakenly verified using Westlaw Precision, an AI-assisted research tool, rather than Westlaw’s standalone legal database.” The lawyer further wrote that she “now understands that Westlaw Precision incorporates AI-assisted research, which can generate fictitious legal authority if not independently verified. She testified she was unable to provide the Court with this research history because the lawyer who produced the AI-generated citations is currently suspended from the practice of law in Louisiana:
“In the interest of transparency and candor, counsel apologizes to the Court and opposing counsel and accepts full responsibility for the oversight. Undersigned counsel now understands that Westlaw Precision incorporates AI-assisted research, which can generate fictitious legal authority if not independently verified. Since discovering the error, all citations in this memorandum have been independently confirmed, and a Motion for Leave to amend the Motion to Transfer has been filed to withdraw the erroneous citations. Counsel has also implemented new safeguards, including manual cross-checking in non AI-assisted databases, to prevent future mistakes.”
“At the time, undersigned counsel understood these authorities to be accurate and reliable. Undersigned counsel made edits and finalized the pleading but failed to independently verify every citation before filing it. Undersigned counsel takes responsibility for this oversight.
Undersigned counsel wants the Court to know that she takes this matter extremely seriously. Undersigned counsel holds the ethical obligations of our profession in the highest regard and apologizes to opposing counsel and the Court for this mistake. Undersigned counsel remains fully committed to the ethical obligations as an officer of the court and the standards expected by this Court going forward, which is evidenced by requesting leave to strike the inaccurate citations. Most importantly, undersigned counsel has taken steps to ensure this oversight does not happen again.”
A lawyer in New York says the death of their spouse distracted them
“We understand the grave implications of misreporting case law to the Court. It is not our intention to do so, and the issue is being investigated internally in our office,” the lawyer in the case wrote.
“The Opposition was drafted by a clerk. The clerk reports that she used Google for research on the issue,” they wrote. “The Opposition was then sent to me for review and filing. I reviewed the draft Opposition but did not check the citations. I take full responsibility for failing to check the citations in the Opposition. I believe the main reason for my failure is due to the recent death of my spouse … My husband’s recent death has affected my ability to attend to the practice of law with the same focus and attention as before.”
A lawyer in California says it was ‘a legal experiment’
This is a weird one, and has to do with an AI-generated petition filed three times in an antitrust lawsuit brought against Apple by the Coronavirus Reporter Corporation. The lawyer in the case explained that he created the document as a “legal experiment.” He wrote:
“I also ‘approved for distribution’ a Petition which Apple now seeks to strike. Apple calls the Petition a ‘manifesto,’ consistent with their five year efforts to deride us. But the Court should be aware that no human ever authored the Petition for Tim Cook’s resignation, nor did any human spend more than about fifteen minutes on it. I am quite weary of Artificial Intelligence, as I am weary of Big Tech, as the Court knows. We have never done such a test before, but we thought there was an interesting computational legal experiment here.
Apple has recently published controversial research that AI LLM's are, in short, not true intelligence. We asked the most powerful commercially available AI, ChatGPT o3 Pro ‘Deep Research’ mode, a simple question: ‘Did Judge Gonzales Rogers’ rebuke of Tim Cook’s Epic conduct create a legally grounded impetus for his termination as CEO, and if so, write a petition explaining such basis, providing contextual background on critics’ views of Apple’s demise since Steve Jobs’ death.’ Ten minutes later, the Petition was created by AI. I don't have the knowledge to know whether it is indeed 'intelligent,' but I was surprised at the quality of the work—so much so that (after making several minor corrections) I approved it for distribution and public input, to promote conversation on the complex implications herein. This is a matter ripe for discussion, and I request the motion be granted.”
Lawyers in Michigan blame an internet outage
“Unfortunately, difficulties were encountered on the evening of April 4 in assembling, sorting and preparation of PDFs for the approximately 1,500 pages of exhibits due to be electronically filed by Midnight. We do use artificial intelligence to supplement their research, along with strict verification and compliance checks before filing.
AI is incorporated into all of the major research tools available, including West and Lexis, and platforms such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and Perplexity. [We] do not rely on AI to write our briefs. We do include AI in their basic research and memorandums, and for checking spelling, syntax, and grammar. As Midnight approached on April 4, our computer system experienced a sudden and unexplainable loss of internet connection and loss of connection with the ECF [e-court filing] system … In the midst of experiencing these technical issues, we erred in our standard verification process and missed identifying incorrect text AI put in parentheticals in four cases in footnote 3, and one case on page 12, of the Opposition.”
Lawyers in Washington DC blame Grammarly, ProWritingAid, and an IT error
“After twenty years of using Westlaw, last summer I started using Lexis and its protege AI product as a natural language search engine for general legal propositions or to help formulate arguments in areas of the law where the courts have not spoken directly on an issue. I have never had a problem or issue using this tool and prior to recent events I would have highly recommended it. I failed to heed the warning provided by Lexis and did not double check the citations provided. Instead, I inserted the quotes, caselaw and uploaded the document to ProWritingAid. I used that tool to edit the brief and at one point used it to replace all the square brackets ( [ ) with parentheses.
In preparing and finalizing the brief, I used the following software tools: Pages with Grammarly and ProWritingAid ... through inadvertence or oversight, I was unaware quotes had been added or that I had included a case that did not actually exist … I immediately started trying to figure out what had happened. I spent all day with IT trying to figure out what went wrong.”
A lawyer in Texas blames their email, their temper, and their legal assistant
“Throughout May 2025, Counsel's office experienced substantial technology related problems with its computer and e-mail systems. As a result, a number of emails were either delayed or not received by Counsel at all. Counsel also possesses limited technological capabilities and relies on his legal assistant for filing documents and transcription - Counsel still uses a dictation phone. However, Counsel's legal assistant was out of the office on the date Plaintiffs Response was filed, so Counsel's law clerk had to take over her duties on that day (her first time filing). Counsel's law clerk had been regularly assisting Counsel with the present case and expressed that this was the first case she truly felt passionate about … While completing these items, Counsel's law clerk had various issues, including with sending opposing counsel the Joint Case Management Plan which required a phone conference to rectify. Additionally, Counsel's law clerk believed that Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss was also due that day when it was not.
In midst of these issues, Counsel - already missing his legal assistant - became frustrated. However, Counsel's law clerk said she had already completed Plaintiff's Response and Counsel immediately read the draft but did not thoroughly examine the cases cited therein … unbeknownst to Counsel and to his dismay, Counsel's law clerk did use artificial intelligence in drafting Plaintiff's Response. Counsel immediately instituted a strict policy prohibiting his staff from using artificial intelligence without exception - Counsel doesn't use artificial intelligence, so neither shall his staff.
Second, Counsel now requires any staff assisting in drafting documents to provide Counsel with a printout of each case cited therein with the passage(s) being relied on highlighted or marked.”
The lawyer also submitted an invoice from a company called Mainframe Computers for $480 which include line items for “Install office,” “printer not working and computer restarting,” “fixes with email and monitors and default fonts,” and “computer errors, change theme, resolution, background, and brightness.”
This post is for subscribers only
Become a member to get access to all content
Subscribe now
Law & Justice Channel reshared this.
Shadowleak: ecco come i cyber criminali possono colpire l’AI con attacchi zero clic
@Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)
La tecnica di attacco messo a punto dai ricercatori di Radware permette di eseguire un prompt injection in ChatGPT Deep Research. Ecco come funziona
L'articolo Shadowleak: ecco come i cyber criminali possono colpire l’AI con attacchi zero clic
‘Negazionista’ Lucia Goracci? Gasparri dovrebbe rispondere di fake news
@Giornalismo e disordine informativo
articolo21.org/2025/09/negazio…
Il senatore Maurizio Gasparri ha accusato di essere “negazionisti” l’inviata del Tg3 Lucia Goracci, esempio di giornalismo rigoroso e professionale, e il presidente
Ask Hackaday: What’s the Top Programming Language of 2025
We did an informal poll around the Hackaday bunker and decided that, for most of us, our favorite programming language is solder. However, [Stephen Cass] over at IEEE Spectrum released their annual post on The Top Programming Languages. We thought it would be interesting to ask you what you think is the “top” language these days and why.
The IEEE has done this since 2013, but even they admit there are some issues with how you measure such an abstract idea. For one thing, what does “top” mean anyway? They provide three rankings. The first is the “Spectrum” ranking, which draws data from various public sources, including Google search, Stack Exchange, and GitHub.
The post argues that as AI coding “help” becomes more ubiquitous, you will care less and less about what language you use. This is analogous to how most programmers today don’t really care about the machine language instruction set. They write high-level language code, and the rest is a detail beneath their notice. They also argue that this will make it harder to get new languages in the pipeline. In the old days, a single book on a language could set it on fire. Now, there will need to be a substantial amount of training data for the AI to ingest. Even now, there have been observations that AI writes worse code for lesser-used languages.
A few surprises: Visual Basic is still holding its own in the job market. Verilog outweighs VHDL, but VHDL still has more jobs than LabVIEW. Who would guess? There are still pockets of Ada. Meanwhile, Fortran and Arduino are about equally ranked, as far as jobs go (though we would argue that Arduino is really C++).
So you tell us. Do you agree with the rankings? Do you think hackers would rank languages differently? Will AI reduce us to describing algorithms instead of writing them? We aren’t holding our breath, but who knows what tomorrow brings? Discuss in the comments.
Da user a root in un secondo! il CISA avverte: milioni di OS a rischio. Patchate!
La Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) degli Stati Uniti ha aggiunto una vulnerabilità critica nella popolare utility Sudo, utilizzata su sistemi Linux e Unix-like, al suo catalogo di vulnerabilità attualmente sfruttabili (KEV).
Il bug è registrato come CVE-2025-32463 e ha un punteggio CVSS di 9,3. Riguarda le versioni di Sudo precedenti alla 1.9.17p1 e consente a un utente locale, tramite l’opzione -R (–chroot), di eseguire comandi arbitrari come root, anche se la loro esecuzione non è specificata nella configurazione di sudoers. Il problema è stato segnalato per la prima volta dal ricercatore di Stratascale Rich Mirch a fine giugno 2025.
Sebbene l’esatto sfruttamento della vulnerabilità e l’identità degli aggressori rimangano poco chiari , la CISA ha documentato casi di sfruttamento in natura. Pertanto, l’agenzia ha ordinato alle agenzie civili federali di affrontare la minaccia entro il 20 ottobre 2025, per ridurre il rischio di compromissione della rete.
Oltre al bug Sudo, altre quattro vulnerabilità sono state aggiunte all’elenco KEV. La prima è CVE-2021-21311 nello strumento Adminer, relativa a SSRF lato server.
Consente ad aggressori remoti di ottenere dati sensibili ed è stata precedentemente sfruttata dal gruppo UNC2903 contro l’infrastruttura AWS, come segnalato da Google Mandiant nel 2022.
La seconda è CVE-2025-20352 in Cisco IOS e IOS XE. Questa vulnerabilità nel sottosistema SNMP può portare sia al denial of service che all’esecuzione di codice arbitrario; Cisco ne ha confermato lo sfruttamento la scorsa settimana .
La terza vulnerabilità è CVE-2025-10035 in Fortra GoAnywhere MFT. Comporta una deserializzazione non sicura e può consentire la sostituzione di oggetti e la successiva iniezione di comandi se un aggressore utilizza una risposta di licenza contraffatta.
Questa attività è stata scoperta da watchTowr Labs. L’ultima vulnerabilità è CVE-2025-59689 in Libraesva Email Security Gateway. Questa falla consente l’iniezione di comandi tramite allegati email compressi; lo sfruttamento è stato confermato dal fornitore.
CISA sottolinea che la presenza di tali voci in KEV indica un’elevata probabilità di attacchi contro le organizzazioni che non hanno installato gli aggiornamenti. Si consiglia a fornitori e amministratori di correggere immediatamente queste vulnerabilità, poiché rappresentano già una minaccia concreta.
L'articolo Da user a root in un secondo! il CISA avverte: milioni di OS a rischio. Patchate! proviene da il blog della sicurezza informatica.
European Innovation Act: l’Europa ascolta, l’Italia deve parlare
L'articolo proviene da #StartMag e viene ricondiviso sulla comunità Lemmy @Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)
Fini e tempi dell'European Innovation Act. L'intervento di Gianmarco Gabrieli, amministratore di Agora Tech
Festival della Missione: mons. Prastaro, “portare il messaggio di Gesù”. Mons. Giraudo: “Allargare sguardo e cuore” - AgenSIR
(Torino) “Il festival ci può aiutare a parlare ancora oggi di missione e a portare il messaggio di Gesù”: mons.Gianni Borsa (AgenSIR)
freezonemagazine.com/news/dry-…
Secret Love è la migliore espressione delle profonde amicizie che hanno dato vita ai Dry Cleaning, tra la frontwoman Florence Shaw, il chitarrista Tom Dowse, il batterista Nick Buxton e il bassista Lewis Maynard. Qui, il quartetto del sud di Londra si colloca nell’avanguardia del rock, catalizzando la paranoia reaganiana del punk e
Gesichtserkennung gegen Grundrechte: Ungarn verbietet auch Pride in Pécs
netzpolitik.org/2025/gesichtse…
Perché Visa sta puntando sulle stablecoin
L'articolo proviene da #StartMag e viene ricondiviso sulla comunità Lemmy @Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)
Visa sta testando un programma per l'utilizzo delle stablecoin nei pagamenti transfrontalieri. È l'ennesima conferma dell'avvicinamento tra la finanza tradizionale e il settore delle crypto. Tutti i dettagli.
Libsophia #24 – Conservazione con Ermanno Ferretti
@Politica interna, europea e internazionale
L'articolo Libsophia #24 – Conservazione con Ermanno Ferretti proviene da Fondazione Luigi Einaudi.
Il ransomware HybridPetya bypassa il Secure Boot Uefi: come proteggersi
@Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)
Pur imitando il famigerato Petya/NotPetya, il modello del ransomware HybridPetya trasforma l’attacco da distruttivo a ricattatorio. Ecco le tendenze negli attacchi ransomware, sempre più verso firmware e boot, più difficili da monitorare e da bonificare, e come
Venezuela, gli Usa valutano attacchi aerei sul Paese e Caracas schiera la difesa aerea
@Notizie dall'Italia e dal mondo
La tensione non accenna a diminuire nel mar dei Caraibi. Il Venezuela ha dichiarato lo stato d’emergenza nazionale e il comando della difesa aerea ha schierato i suoi sistemi missilistici BUK-M2E attorno a Caracas. La decisione è stata presa a seguito delle voci, sempre più insistenti, che
Data breach e filiera dei fornitori
@Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)
Il rapporto tra data breach e filiera di fornitori è spesso sottovalutato nonostante, da oltre un decennio, le buone prassi stabiliscano metodi e approcci utili a regolarlo. Di recente c’è […]
L'articolo Data breach e filiera dei fornitori proviene da Edoardo Limone.
L'articolo proviene dal blog dell'esperto di #Cybersecurity
Il sindaco del paese, sul presunto assassino: "Lui è un grande lavoratore probabilmente non abbiamo colto qualche segnale che si è manifestato in questi ultimi giorni. Sono stato a una festa insieme alla coppia e non c'era nessun segno di disaccordo tra loro".
(il grassetto è sul sito non l'ho aggiunto io)
Un compendio di tutto quello che di sciocco si può dire davanti ad un femminicidio.
rainews.it/articoli/2025/09/uc…
Uccide la moglie a colpi di pietra: marito ricercato in tutta Italia, irreperibili anche i figli
La donna, 49 anni, sarebbe stata uccisa con un corpo contundente. Diffusa la foto segnaletica di Salvatore Ocone. All'appello mancano anche i due figli minori della coppia, il terzo, maggiorenne, non viveva con i genitori e i fratelliRedazione di Rainews (RaiNews)
reshared this
Dal nuovo missile Teseo Mk2E alla torretta Lionfish 30, cosa c’è in mostra a Seafuture 2025
@Notizie dall'Italia e dal mondo
A La Spezia ha preso il via Seafuture 2025, evento che, fino al 2 ottobre, mette in campo le ambizioni tecnologiche e strategiche della difesa navale italiana e non solo. Alla cerimonia inaugurale il ministro Guido Crosetto ha lanciato un messaggio chiaro: “non c’è progresso senza sapere, senza
“The Voice of Hind Rajab” a Orvieto il primo ottobre
@Giornalismo e disordine informativo
articolo21.org/2025/09/the-voi…
Domani sera (primo ottobre), alle 20, presso il cinema Corso, promosso da Articolo 21 e dal coordinamento della Palestina, “The Voice of Hind Rajab”. Diretto da Kaouther Ben Hania (nominata agli Oscar per Four
Kruku reshared this.
freezonemagazine.com/articoli/…
C’è una rara coerenza tra vita e arte quando si parla di Angelica Mente, alias Nicoletta Magnani. Architetto, flautista e violoncellista, cantautrice, scrittrice di prosa poetica e disegnatrice, l’artista varesina ha sempre intrecciato i linguaggi in un unico ordito, dove ogni gesto creativo sembra rimandare all’altro, in pratica lei è un genio multiforme. Dopo l’avventura […]
L'articolo
Ucraina, la Russia colpisce i soldi della Nato
Il Corriere della Sera dice ai suoi lettori che Putin è un dittatore comunista, com’è d’uso per un giornale satirico che i suoi lettori e persino i suoi redattori prendono invece sul serio, dimostrando così il livello a cui è giunta quella che una volta si chiamava la buona borghesia italiana.
Non dice invece, assieme ai confratelli dell’ordine giornalistico Fatemalefratelli, che Putin va ascoltato con molta attenzione. Qualche tempo fa il presidente russo aveva detto che se i Paesi della Nato avessero creato in Ucraina nuove fabbriche di armi, esse sarebbero state distrutte. E il monito si è trasformato in realtà: è stata completamente azzerata la fabbrica di droni sentinella che i tedeschi avevano impiantato in una delle officine attorno al complesso Antonov, quello che ai tempi dell’Unione sovietica produceva l’aereo da trasporto più grande del mondo.
Si tratta di un cambiamento di strategia da parte russa che risponde alla nuova ondata di aggressività delle Nato e al suo tentativo di aggirare il problema del trasporto di armi in Ucraina, installando stabilimenti direttamente in loco.
Ma non si tratta solo di questo stabilimento: decine di fabbriche legare alla Nato in numerose località sono state colpite e distrutte, assieme a un certo numero, dai 5 ai 6, di F16 nell’aeroporto di Starokonstantinov.
Naturalmente l’Alleanza Atlantica, com’è suo inveterato costume, non bada molto alle vittime civili e così le fabbriche di armi sono situate, di proposito, in mezzo alle città in modo da rendere più problematico colpirle. Ma missili e droni russi sono piuttosto precisi e raramente danneggiano strutture civili: a fare vittime è piuttosto la contraerea ucraina i cui missili finiscono per cadere sulle case dopo aver colpito l’aria.
I cittadini ucraini hanno prodotto fino ad ora centinaia di migliaia, se non milioni di foto che raffigurano i resti di tali missili, dei Patriot in particolare, disseminati sulle strade e in qualche caso caduti anche sulle case e su ospedale.
Poco male, è tutta carne al fuoco per la propaganda antirussa: è molto facile per i carnefici trasformarsi in vittime, come hanno tentato persino di fare i sionisti, la cui strage era sotto gli occhi di tutti. Con il piccolo particolare che i missili ricadono sulla città quando non colpiscono i loro obiettivi e dunque alla fine si tratta di carcasse che narrano soprattutto la mediocrità dei sistemi di difesa occidentali.
Ad ogni modo questa nuova strategia russa, di passare dal colpire le infrastrutture energetiche e militari ucraine, alle vere e proprie fabbriche di armi, ha un significato che va al di là dell’ovvia distruzione della residua capacità militare ucraina, ma punta a colpire gli interessi economici che tengono viva la guerra al di là di ogni ragionevolezza.
Negli ultimi due anni parecchie industrie, soprattutto tedesche e francesi, ma anche britanniche e statunitensi hanno investito in fabbriche di armi in ucraina, soprattutto volte alla realizzazione di droni e rischiano ora di ritrovarsi con un mucchio di macerie.
Dunque il nuovo verso della guerra da parte dei russi è quella di scoraggiare chi pensasse di speculare sull’ucraina e di demolire assieme alle fabbriche, anche quell’atmosfera favorevole alla guerra che è anche frutto di questi investimenti. Insomma Putin che non è un dittatore comunista come dicono i venditori di balle all’ingrosso, sta dicendo agli occidentali: l’Ucraina non è un posto dove potrete fare soldi fomentando un’inutile strage.
Ma come si desume anche alla distruzione del centro logistico Nato di Vinnitsa, avvenuto due giorni fa, Mosca non ha più alcuna prudenza nel colpire le strutture dell’Alleanza. Ora che la pace sembra più lontana e l’accanimento della Nato non ha più ritegno nel sostegno della guerra, non c’è ragione di non colpire strutture che di ucraino hanno solo il nome.
È certamente un argomento molto più efficace di tutti quelli proponibili per porre fine al conflitto. Del resto l’unica strategia della Nato è ormai quella di colpire le città russe, di portare attacchi sotto falsa bandiera, di importare mercenari di cui intero battaglione è stato sgominato proprio l’altro giorno. Ma alla fine, persa la guerra, la Nato perderà anche la sua guerriglia.
ilsimplicissimus
Assemblea Nazionale “Convergiamo” del 27/09 – Le conclusioni
Stop Rearm Europe: "Governo dica a Israele che Flotilla non si tocca". Sì a Tavolo delle convergenze di Rete No DL Sicurezza e ad alleanze internazionali.Rifondazione Comunista
I lavoratori del Teatro La Fenice hanno dichiarato “lo stato di agitazione permanente” a seguito della nomina di Beatrice Venezi alla Direzione Musicale del teatro e chiedono la revoca della nomina giudicata non trasparente, “imposta” e “non all’altezza della tradizione del Teatro”.
In una lettera aperta al Sovrintendente le Professoresse e i Professori d’orchestra contestano il metodo della nomina, avvenuta senza nessuna consultazione dei lavoratori, e il merito: “il suo curriculum non è minimamente paragonabile a quello delle grandi bacchette che in passato hanno ricoperto il ruolo di Direttore Musicale” de La Fenice.
La nomina di Beatrice Venezi – che nel 2021 ha ricevuto il premio “Atreju21″ nell’ambito della festa Atreju organizzata annualmente dal partito Fratelli d’Italia e nel 2022 è stata nominata dall’allora ministro San Giuliano “consigliere per la musica” – è stata approvata all’unanimità dal presidente della Fondazione, il sindaco di Venezia Luigi Brugnaro, e da tutti i consiglieri di indirizzo. Con le ovvie felicitazioni del ministro Giuli.
Dopo i lavoratori e l’Orchestra anche il pubblico de La Fenice si è fatto sentire: al solo annuncio della nomina si sono registrate disdette da parte degli abbonati storici del teatro.
Ancora una volta la destra al Governo pensa di poter imporre una sua fantomatica “egemonia culturale” attraverso nomine “improbabili” in tutti i luoghi di produzione culturale del paese, tagliando fondi agli artisti “scomodi” e imponendo censure.
Rifondazione comunista sostiene la lotta dei lavoratori e delle professoresse e dei professori d’orchestra in difesa del prestigio di un Teatro che ha fatto la storia culturale di questo paese e come tale è riconosciuto in tutto il mondo e in difesa di una gestione democratica e partecipata di quella che è una istituzione culturale pubblica.
Rifondazione comunista è con i lavoratori e gli orchestrali de La Fenice perché, come dicono in un loro volantino, “la musica non ha colore, non ha genere, non ha età. La musica è arte, non intrattenimento”.
Per Rifondazione comunista i teatri lirici hanno oggi più che mai bisogno di una grande riforma: devono tornare ad essere luoghi pubblici e democratici di produzione, formazione e diffusione culturale, devono poter contare sulla certezza di finanziamenti pubblici garantiti dallo Stato, devono poter valorizzare al massimo le grandi professionalità dei nostri lavoratori che devono poter partecipare alle scelte che li riguardano. Come tutti i luoghi della cultura devono essere sottratti alle ingerenze governative e devono avere un unico obiettivo: la qualità artistica delle produzioni.
Stefania Brai, responsabile nazionale cultura Prc/Se
Il 25 settembre Adriano Di Maio, direttore dell’area cinema e serie tv della Rai, annuncia alla stampa la programmazione su Raitre del film premio Oscar “No Other Land” per il 7 ottobre. La data è ovviamente simbolica come è simbolico il fatto che si tratta di un’opera diretta, prodotta, scritta e montata da un collettivo israelo-palestinese.
Mentre i coloni israeliani investivano uno dei registi – Basel Adra – e occupato la sua casa, mentre l’esercito israeliano aggrediva, picchiava e arrestava Hamdam Ballal, uno degli operatori del film, e mentre veniva ucciso da un colono Odeh Hadalin, tra i protagonisti del film, mentre accadeva tutto questo, la Rai ha pensato bene di sospendere la trasmissione di “No Other Land” senza nessuna giustificazione pubblica.
Rifondazione comunista chiede alla dirigenza del Servizio pubblico radiotelevisivo se è vero che la sospensione della programmazione del film è avvenuta a seguito di una “telefonata di natura politica”, come riportato dalla stampa.
Se la notizia risponde a verità Rifondazione comunista chiede che sia reso pubblico il nome dell’autore della telefonata, il contenuto della conversazione e il nome del dirigente o dei dirigenti che hanno acconsentito alla richiesta di censura. Altrimenti la Rai – Servizio pubblico pagato dai cittadini e dalle cittadine – chiarisca pubblicamente le motivazioni di una scelta di tale gravità.
Rifondazione comunista chiede ai membri del Governo di assumersi pubblicamente la responsabilità di una gravissima interferenza e censura politica sul servizio pubblico radiotelevisivo e sulla libertà di espressione e di comunicazione.
Rifondazione comunista da anni si batte per una nuova legge di riforma della Rai che la sottragga alle ingerenze governative cui è sottoposta grazie alla legge del 2015 del Pd e che la riporti sotto il controllo del Parlamento. Oggi anche in obbligata attuazione di un Regolamento europeo.
Ma come Rifondazione comunista riteniamo che non sia sufficiente cambiare la “governance”. Occorre affrontare i nodi della sua missione, della sua struttura aziendale, delle sue professionalità, del suo rapporto col paese reale. Finché il consiglio di amministrazione sarà privato di qualsiasi ruolo, finché tutti i poteri rimarranno nelle mani di una sola persona al comando, finché non si restituirà potere decisionale e ideativo alle varie strutture e alle tante professionalità, finché non si attuerà un reale decentramento e una reale democratizzazione interna ed “esterna” della Rai, non ci sarà una reale riforma del servizio pubblico.
Stefania Brai, responsabile nazionale cultura Prc/Se
reshared this
rag. Gustavino Bevilacqua reshared this.
La Gallery di Settembre
Ecco un po’ di foto dalle nostre Cellule Coscioni in giro per l’Italia, dagli eventi precongressuali a PMA per tutte fino alla mobilitazione per la campagna “Aborto senza ricovero. Clicca sull’icona della macchina fotografica per scorrere le foto!
L'articolo La Gallery di Settembre proviene da Associazione Luca Coscioni.
Come l’intelligenza artificiale rivoluzionerà l’industria
L'articolo proviene da #StartMag e viene ricondiviso sulla comunità Lemmy @Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)
Chi c'era e che cosa si è detto al seminario di Start Magazine “Ai alla prova dei fatti”
bomby reshared this.
PODCAST. I 20 punti di Trump: un piano per cancellare la questione palestinese
@Notizie dall'Italia e dal mondo
Festeggia Netanyahu che torna da Washington con in tasca un progetto che accoglie le sue condizioni per fermare la distruzione di Gaza e, più di tutto, non offre alcuna garanzia per la creazione di uno Stato palestinese
L'articolo PODCAST. I 20 punti
Gesundheitsdigitalisierung am Limit: Warum es bei der elektronischen Patientenakte noch immer hakt
netzpolitik.org/2025/gesundhei…
Perù in fiamme, Bolouarte sotto accusa: contestata all’ONU e nelle piazze
@Notizie dall'Italia e dal mondo
Dalla Generazione Z alle comunità indigene, cresce la contestazione contro un potere accusato di lawfare, repressione e sudditanza agli interessi delle élite
L'articolo Perù in fiamme, Bolouarte sotto accusa: contestata all’ONU e nelle piazze proviene da
UCRAINA. Giovani in fuga e accuse a Zelensky
@Notizie dall'Italia e dal mondo
Mentre le trattative tra Russia e Ucraina sono in stallo, i giovani fuggono dal paese e crescono le accuse di accentramento e autoritarismo nei confronti del presidente Zelensky
L'articolo UCRAINA. Giovani in fuga e accuse a Zelensky proviene pagineesteri.it/2025/09/30/mon…
LE ACCUSE DEI POLITICI OCCIDENTALI E DEI MEDIA CONTRO LA RUSSIA RIGUARDO AGLI INCIDENTI CON I DRONI IN EUROPA NON SONO CONFERMATE DAI RISULTATI DELLE VERIFICHE DELLA NATO E DEI SERVIZI DI INTELLIGENCE NAZIONALI - Berliner Zeitung
L'analisi mostra che la maggior parte degli incidenti fa parte di operazioni standard o è conseguenza delle interferenze dei jammer ucraini, senza prove di intenzioni militari da parte della Russia. Il giornale afferma che queste accuse infondate, amplificate dai media, creano un clima di paura utilizzato per giustificare il riarmo dell'Europa.
Info Defense
Klein has attempted to subpoena Discord and Reddit for information that would reveal the identity of moderators of a subreddit critical of him. The moderators' lawyers fear their clients will be physically attacked if the subpoenas go through.
Klein has attempted to subpoena Discord and Reddit for information that would reveal the identity of moderators of a subreddit critical of him. The moderatorsx27; lawyers fear their clients will be physically attacked if the subpoenas go through.#News #YouTube
Reddit Mods Sued by YouTuber Ethan Klein Fight Efforts to Unmask Them
This article was produced in collaboration with Court Watch, an independent outlet that unearths overlooked court records.Subscribe to them here.Critics of YouTuber Ethan Klein are pushing back on subpoenas that would reveal their identities as part of an ongoing legal fight between Klein and his detractors. Klein is a popular content creator whose YouTube channel has more than 2 million subscribers. He’s also involved in a labyrinthine personal and legal beef with three other content creators and the moderators of a subreddit that criticises his work. Klein filed a legal motion to compel Discord and Reddit to reveal the identities of those moderators, a move their lawyers say would put them in harm’s way and stifle free speech on the internet forever.
Klein is most famous for his H3 Podcast and collaborations with Hasan Piker and Trisha Paytas which he produced through his company Ted Entertainment Inc. Following a public falling out with Piker, Klein released a longform video essay critiquing his former podcast partner. As often happens with long video essays about YouTube drama, other content creators filmed themselves watching Klein’s essay.
playlist.megaphone.fm?p=TBIEA2…
These are called “reaction” videos and they’re pretty common on YouTube. Klein sued three creators—Frogan, Kaceytron, and Denims—calling their specific reaction videos low effort copyright infringement. As part of the lawsuit, he also went after the moderation team of the r/h3snark subreddit—a board on Reddit that critiques Klein and had shared the Denims video as part of a thread about Klein’s Piker essay.On July 31, a judge allowed Klein’s lawyers to file a subpoena with Reddit and Discord that would reveal the identities of the people running r/h3snark and an associated Discord server. On September 22, lawyers for the defendants filed a motion to quash the subpoenas.
“On its face, the Action is about copyright infringement,” the latest filing said. “At its heart, however, the Action is about stifling criticism and seeking retribution by unmasking individuals for perceived reputational harms TEI [Klein’s production company] attributes to [John Doe moderators] unrelated to TEI’s intellectual property rights.”
The defendants’ lawyers said the subpoena to unmask moderators should be quashed because Klein can’t prove his case of copyright infringement, but also because revealing such information could put the Does’ in harm’s way. “The balance of equities weighs in favor of Does’ anonymity and quashing TEI’s Subpoenas in their entirety,” the filing said.
As evidence of the danger faced by the Does, the court filing quoted Klein directly. “Listen, guys, at this point you [r/h3snark mods] are totally fucked,” Klein said on a podcast, according to the court filing. “There’s a subpoena that’s going to come. You can’t erase your data. We’re going to get your IP address and find your information.”
“If there’s any justice in the world [the h3snark mods] will lose everything that they care about and I will be the one who makes them lose those things […] through legal means. Through any legal means,” he said, according to the court filing.
The defendants' lawyers paint a grim picture of what might happen should Klein’s subpoenas succeed: they “fear potentially being attacked, or worse, killed, over moderating a subreddit,” the filing said. “These worries extend to all family and friends connected to Does. Does fear their professional lives being ruined, potential sexual violence, extortion, fans showing up to their home, and endless years of harassment due to Ethan’s prolific lies surrounding them. The target he has painted on the moderators would make it unsafe to live openly in any capacity. Some Does also have heightened risk of retaliatory harm due to their religious identities. If their real names are revealed, these Does—and their families—face a real risk of being doxed, stalked, or harassed, as has happened to others in similar situations. In this climate, unmasking Does would expose them to significant and unjustified danger.”
Personal safety wasn’t the only legal argument the moderator’s lawyers put forward. A key part of Klein’s claim is that the Does violated his copyright by hosting links on r/h3snark of other streamers reacting to his video “Content Nuke—Hasan Piker.” His legal case is built around going after content creators for making “low effort” content using his work, but also the anonymous people on Reddit who shared links of those videos.
“The next question is whether creating a discussion thread, which includes a link to a streamer’s channel, where the streamer reacts to a live broadcast while providing her own commentary and criticism, and users visiting the thread engage in their own debate about the live broadcast and reactions thereto, constitutes contributory infringement,” the filing said. “It does not.”
The lawyers also argued that a Reddit “megathread”—a common practice where the moderators of a subreddit create one single space on a board for people to talk about a specific top—are fair use, that the reaction videos were transformative and should be considered fair use, and that the reaction videos increased the public’s exposure to Klein’s video.
💡
Do you know anything else about this story? I would love to hear from you. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at +1 347 762-9212 or send me an email at matthew@404media.co.At the end of the filing, the lawyers returned again to the personal safety of the moderators. They argued that even if Klein’s claim of copyright infringement met the burden of proof, and the lawyers don’t believe it does, the balance of harms is in favor of the moderators. “The personal harms to Does by allowing unmasking, as well as the public harms to online speech and discourse generally, would be irreparable in the private sense and long-reaching in the public sense,” the filing said.
The anonymity of places like Reddit and Discord grant a layer of protection to people seeking to critique power. This case could set a dangerous precedent, the lawyers believe. “If the court allows TEI’s Subpoenas, it would enable TEI to impose a considerable price on Does’ use of the vehicle of anonymous speech—including public exposure, real risks of retaliation and actual harm, and the financial and other burdens of defending the Action,” the filing said.
The filing added: “Very few would-be commentators are prepared to bear costs of this magnitude. So, when word gets out that the price tag of criticizing Ethan is this high—that speech will disappear. But that is precisely what Ethan Klein wants.”
Breaking News Channel reshared this.