@Cas_33 popcorn a pioggia in viale Trastevere 😅

@musica @matz @nicodilascio @strk @hristotranqui

@6al in realtà il problema sta solo nella penalizzazione. Non c'è alcuna possibilità che l'errore del Ministero possa avvantaggiare chi, malgrado tutto, è riuscito a scrivere un buon tema sulla partitura farlocca

@esilvia @musica @matz @nicodilascio @strk @hristotranqui

@esilvia o semplicemente hanno dato per scontato che quella presentata durante la prova fosse semplicemente una versione semplificata. Il principio di autorità di cui è portatore il testo ufficiale del ministero, in questo caso non è un principio sbagliato ma è il fondamento stesso della prova concorsuale. Se viene meno il rapporto di fiducia tra l'autorità e lo studente esaminando, si crea un problema gravissimo

@6al @musica @matz @nicodilascio @strk @hristotranqui

hmmmm 🤔🤔🤔

1. If they're already on fedi then they're probably my kind of weird

2. Questions and Answers with the ability to rank how important the subject is to you

3. Everything is tinder now and you can't message anyone anymore if you don't match in less than 2 seconds off a profile photo only

4. I've seen some sites with validation in the form of uploading a short video of you reading a script to match against your photos.

Sensitive content Clicca per aprire/chiudere

1. search and filtering based on self-ranked categories/labels, with more info revealed to better matches

2. accessible interfaces and ease of use

3. looks-first matching and engagement farming

4. a trust network and good moderation tools

1. Sufficient space to talk about myself and my interests.

3. Not being able to contact people without paying.

4. The ability to block arseholes - from their profile, not just if they message me.

Solve the devilish problem of privacy versus assurance that people are real. My biggest issue with other sites is that im glad to share private details with other honest real folk on the site, but existing services are greedy evilcorps, harvesting and selling intimate details, while allowing oceans of scammers from all corners of the earth who pretend to be in my postal code.

Its a tall order.... But I'd gladly pay a non profit for the service.

not really using dating apps. So my mentions are maybe completely out of reality.

1. Safety: your data stays your data, no AI training, Building up Data to get stolen, e.t.c.

2. No profile picture: text, match, vibe, after that there is a option to defog your Profile picture or Pictures

3. Bullet points: Something to look at and Match before going deeper. But the points are also clickable to show an Explanation what the Individual understands under the bullet points. (bioware)

Possibility to safe someone to maybe match later, or at least revert rejections. It happened far to often that I accidentally swiped the wrong way.

Also no paywalls pls.

@Legit_Spaghetti Fake profiles are a huge problem in commercial dating apps. I used to be an avid reader of Reddit's r/scams and the amount of people who get targeted by romance/crypto scams is enormous.

Often times, the red flags are obvious to the people who know them, but the victims usually don't. So regularly giving out short tips with links to in-depth explanations of red flags or descriptions of scam patterns and how to stay safe in general seems like a good idea.

If I can add (as not in the Dating Pool):

4: Photos only sendable with a kind "invite only", so when the other side explicitly gives the permission to send photos.
I've heard so much of female friends who got unsolitcide Pics, maybe this would help

Oooh this is a good idea.

1. If I stress an age/gender/sexuality/distance range, don't show me people outside of that. Also the ability to see likes and message people without paying.

2. I like the optional questions on okcupid to build percentages, with the ability to add more details to the questions.

3. swipe left/right. Paywalls. Minimum characters in bios. I hate writing bios and would rather match based on a few criteria and chat with them a while to get to know them.

4. Being able to block people based on their profile.

a #FediDating platform would be awesome!

Features I would love include the basic intro to feel how we can thrive together and give back to the world. Maybe ability to post a few pictures of what we like, such as a shot of our open source laptop, pets, bicycling, hiking, etc...

What features do I not want? Identity scraping sold to lists and billionaires that attempt to capture our basic freedoms and exploit our mere existence. What safety features do I need to feel safe? The ability to avoid having my identity included in a list sold to billionaire think tanks used to control my future.

That's about it

A very easy and clear way for one to say 'I do romance but not sex' is something I remember noticing just not existing the few times I poked dating apps. Granted I also got the impression most people on dating apps were looking for sex more than romance.

No offense intended toward allosexuals, just not what I'm looking for ^^;

Sensitive content Clicca per aprire/chiudere

@Legit_Spaghetti I came here to say this. OKC was great for people who liked writing oddly specific answers to their often very boring and Americocentric questions. I'd answered about 2000 questions by the time they Tinderised the platform to death (insomnia will do that to you) and met so many lovely people through it, some of whom I'm still in touch with.

So, to answer the question: freeform answers and the ability to choose weightings and dealbreakers.

@Legit_Spaghetti
Oh yeah, I met my wife on OkCupid too, around the same time even.

Remember when OkCupid used to not be dogshite? Crazy times.

@Legit_Spaghetti same here, found my husband there.

Just want to add that you could comment your choices, and many of the questions were absurd and funny to fill in. It was part of the fun of filling them in.

Also I massively prefer the LEX style where people can post and interact in a semi natural social media way instead of the swipe format where you are cold messaging strangers.

Having a space where people can see you interacting with other people on the platform is such a massive thing and changes the dynamics a lot. You can build a reputation and make jokes and post stuff in the public feed where people can see. So someone might watch you from a distance for a while before deciding to message. I think that's a much better way of doing things imo.

What I think is particularly interesting about a fediverse approach to dating is that I've never seen a dating site use the existing social connections between people to help. For example, I want to write public recommendations for other people ("hey, I think this person is cool and here's why you should date them"). Horrifyingly, I think the easiest way to describe what I mean is "LinkedIn for dating". (Maybe Fedi-Dating and Fedi-Job-Hunting should be the same protocol, but with different profiles?) I think it's often easier for people who know you to talk you up than it is to promote yourself.

That said, safety is already difficult in both social networks and dating sites, so identifying the right safety features for a combination of both is particularly intimidating.