noblogo.org/transit/un-ponte-s…

Transit

2025-11-01 15:53:50

Un ponte sul mare dei conti.

(174)

Il dibattito sul ponte sullo stretto di Messina di questi giorni va oltre la politica. I rilievi della Corte dei conti non sono un atto di ostruzionismo, ma l’esercizio di una funzione di garanzia che tutela la legalità, la trasparenza e la corretta gestione delle risorse pubbliche. In un sistema democratico equilibrato, il controllo non è un freno, ma uno strumento di responsabilità.

Il progetto del ponte muove circa 14 miliardi di euro, coinvolge interessi strategici e incide sull’ambiente, sull’economia e sulla coesione territoriale. È naturale, e necessario, che la Corte chieda chiarezza su piani finanziari, sostenibilità economica e conformità giuridica degli atti, per assicurare che ogni fase rispetti le norme sui contratti pubblici e sulla spesa dello Stato.

Nel caso del governo Meloni, la spinta verso una realizzazione rapida dell’opera è ovvia: il ponte è diventato un simbolo politico, un progetto identitario che promette infrastrutture e sviluppo. Tuttavia, l’urgenza non può sostituire la trasparenza né giustificare forzature amministrative. Il ruolo della Corte è proprio quello di ricordare che una grande opera vive solo se fondata su basi legali solide e su una gestione finanziaria sostenibile.

Parlare di “attacco” o “ostacolo” da parte della Corte significa travisare la sua missione costituzionale. La funzione di controllo serve a rafforzare la credibilità dell’azione di governo, non a limitarla. In un periodo in cui il debito pubblico pesa e i margini di spesa sono stretti, è fondamentale che ogni euro investito sia tracciabile e coerente con i vincoli di legge.

La correttezza dei rilievi contabili sta nel richiamare l’attenzione su elementi tecnici che non possono essere ignorati: la revisione dei contratti con i concessionari, la copertura finanziaria pluriennale, la valutazione dei rischi ambientali e la trasparenza delle gare. Sono queste le condizioni per evitare arbitrio, sprechi o contenziosi futuri che rallenterebbero ulteriormente i lavori. La vera modernizzazione non è solo costruire infrastrutture, ma farlo rispettando le regole e garantendo che la spesa pubblica sia un investimento per tutti, non un rischio collettivo.

Ora serve che il governo Meloni abbandoni la retorica distrattiva. Se davvero la priorità è costruire il futuro dell’Italia, si dimostri di saperlo fare passando dal rispetto delle leggi e dall’ascolto delle istituzioni di controllo. Solo così questa opera potrà essere il simbolo di un paese credibile, non di una stagione di scorciatoie, e non divenire l’ennesimo fallimento di un esecutivo che, per ora, non ha portato a casa quasi nulla.

#Blog #PonteSulloStretto #GovernoMeloni #Opinioni #Italia #Politica

Mastodon: @alda7069@mastodon.unoTelegram: t.me/transitblogFriendica: @danmatt@poliverso.orgBio Site (tutto in un posto solo, diamine): bio.site/danielemattioli

Gli scritti sono tutelati da “Creative Commons” (qui)

Tutte le opinioni qui riportate sono da considerarsi personali. Per eventuali problemi riscontrati con i testi, si prega di scrivere a: corubomatt@gmail.com

Transit

Il blog di Alessandra Corubolo & Daniele Mattioli. On line -in varie forme- dal 2005.

^Telegram

Conoscete la storia dell’elefante Don Diego?

Venite a scoprirla il 12 novembre alla Biblioteca Universitaria Alessandrina!
Verrà presentato il volume “Don Diego alla corte roveresca di Casteldurante: l’Historia naturale dell’elefante” di Antonella Attanasio.

Primo dei “Quaderni” della collana “Immaginare i Saperi” per De Luca Editori d’Arte

Interventi di:
Daniela Fugaro, direttrice della Biblioteca Universitaria Alessandrina

Massimo Moretti, Sapienza Università di Roma

Lucia Tomasi Tongiorgi, Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei

Antonella Sbrilli, Sapienza Università di Roma

Ore 17.00 Sala Bio Bibliografica
Biblioteca Universitaria Alessandrina
Palazzo del Rettorato della Sapienza
Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5

.
.
.
#immaginareisaperi#bibliotecauniversitariaalessandrina#sapienzauniversitàdiroma

@delucaeditori@massimo_.moretti@antonellattanasio@diconodioggi@storiadellarterivista@bibliotecaalessandrina

alessandrina.cultura.gov.it/pr…

There’s something delightfully sci-fi about any kind of volumetric display. Sure, you know it’s not really a hologram, and Princess Leia isn’t about to pop out and tell you you’re her only hope, but nothing says “this is the future” like an image floating before you in 3D. [Matthew Lim] has put together an interesting one, using persistence-of-vision and linear motion.

The basic concept is so simple we’re kind of surprised we don’t see it more often. Usually, POV displays use rotary motion: on a fan, a globe, a disk, or even a drone, we’ve seen all sorts of spinning LEDs tricking the brain into thinking there’s an image to be seen. [Matthew’s] is apparently the kind of guy who sticks to the straight-and-narrow, on the other hand, because his POV display uses linear motion.

An ESP32-equipped LED matrix module is bounced up by an ordinary N20 motor that’s equipped with an encoder and driven by a DRV8388. Using an encoder and the motor driver makes sure that the pixels on the LED matrix are synced perfectly to the up-and-down motion, allowing for volumetric effects. This seems like a great technique, since it eliminates the need for slip rings you might have with rotary POV displays. It does of course introduce its own challenges, given that inertia is a thing, but I think we can agree the result speaks for itself.

One interesting design choice is that the display is moved by a simple rack-and-pinion, requiring the motor to reverse 16 times per second. We wonder if a crank wouldn’t be easier on the hardware. Software too, since [matthew] has to calibrate for backlash in the gear train. In any case, the stroke length of 20 mm creates a cubical display since the matrix is itself 20 mm x 20 mm. (That’s just over 3/4″, or about twice the with of a french fry.) In that 20 mm, he can fit eight layers, so not a great resolution on the Z-axis but enough for us to call it “volumetric” for sure. A faster stroke is possible, but it both reduces the height of the display and increases wear on the components, which are mostly 3D printed, after all.

It’s certainly an interesting technique, and the speechless (all subtitles) video is worth watching– at least the first 10 seconds so you can see this thing in action.

Thanks to [carl] for the tip. If a cool project persists in your vision, do please let us know.

youtube.com/embed/KgT20tHpk1g?…

hackaday.com/2025/11/01/volume…

Possibly the biggest privacy story of the year for Europeans and, by extension the rest of the world, has been ChatControl. Chatcontrol is a European Union proposal backed by Denmark for a mandatory backdoor in all online communications. As always with these things, it was touted as a think-of-the-children solution to online child abuse material, but as many opposed to it have warned, that concealed far more sinister possibilities. For now, it seems we can breathe easily as the Danes are reported to have formally backed away from the proposal after it was roundly condemned by the German government, sending it firmly into the political wilderness.

Hackaday readers are likely vastly more informed on this matter than many of the general public, so you’ll have no need for a primer on the obvious privacy and security concerns of such a move. From our point of view, it also suffered from the obvious flaw of being very unlikely to succeed in its stated aim. Even the most blinkered politician should understand that criminals would simply move their traffic to newly-illegal encrypted forms of communication without government backdoors. Perhaps it speaks volumes that it was the Germans who sounded its death-knell, given that state surveillance on that level is very much within living memory for many of them.

The mood in European hackerspaces has been gloomy of late on the subject, so it’s something of a cause for celebration on the continent. If only other governments on the same side of the Atlantic could understand that intrusive measures in the name of thinking of the children don’t work.

European flags: Šarūnas Burdulis, CC BY-SA 2.0 .

hackaday.com/2025/11/01/chatco…

Il 28 ottobre 2025, durante il Forum di cooperazione sulla sicurezza dei cavi sottomarini Taiwan-UE, svoltosi a Taipei, il ministro degli Esteri taiwanese Lin Chia-lung ha presentato la “Iniziativa Internazionale per la Gestione del Rischio dei Cavi Sottomarini”, sottolineando che non si tratta di un progetto esclusivamente di Taiwan, ma di un accordo di collaborazione globale.

Una partnership per la resilienza delle infrastrutture digitali

L’evento, organizzato congiuntamente dal Centro per la Scienza, la Democrazia e la Società (DSET), dal Formosa Club e dal Ministero degli Affari Esteri, ha riunito esperti, rappresentanti governativi e istituzioni europee.

Tra i relatori è intervenuto Richards Kols, presidente del Formosa Club di Taipei e membro della Commissione per gli Affari Esteri del Parlamento Europeo, che ha aperto i lavori del forum.

Nel suo intervento, Lin ha evidenziato come i cavi sottomarini rappresentino un’infrastruttura critica per le comunicazioni globali, ma allo stesso tempo vulnerabile a incidenti e minacce.
Nella regione indo-pacifica, frequentemente colpita da terremoti, i guasti ai cavi sono un problema costante.

A questi si aggiungono i danni causati da attività umane come pesca, dragaggio, ancoraggio e costruzioni offshore, che ogni anno provocano centinaia di interruzioni e comportano costi di manutenzione significativi per governi e operatori.

Le minacce emergenti: sabotaggio e guerra ibrida

Il ministro ha espresso preoccupazione per i rischi di sabotaggio deliberato, sottolineando come il taglio intenzionale dei cavi possa essere utilizzato come strumento di guerra ibrida o coercizione geopolitica, in grado di compromettere la sicurezza nazionale e l’economia di un Paese.

Negli ultimi anni, Taiwan ha sperimentato direttamente le conseguenze di questi incidenti, in particolare nelle isole periferiche, dove le interruzioni di rete hanno avuto ripercussioni sul commercio, sui servizi finanziari, sulle comunicazioni d’emergenza e sulla vita quotidiana dei cittadini.

Taiwan, nodo strategico nelle comunicazioni globali

Lin ha ricordato che Taiwan occupa una posizione strategica nel sistema delle telecomunicazioni internazionali: numerosi cavi sottomarini passano attraverso o vicino all’isola, collegando l’Indo-Pacifico, il Nord America e l’Europa.

Questa centralità comporta non solo vantaggi economici, ma anche una responsabilità condivisa nella protezione delle reti globali. Secondo il ministro, “la stabilità nello Stretto di Taiwan rappresenta un bene pubblico globale, e Taiwan è pronta a contribuire attivamente alla sua salvaguardia”.

I quattro pilastri dell’iniziativa internazionale

L’Iniziativa Internazionale per la Gestione del Rischio dei Cavi Sottomarini mira a promuovere una cooperazione multilaterale tra Stati, imprese e istituzioni, attraverso quattro obiettivi principali:

1. Mitigazione del rischio: rafforzare la manutenzione preventiva, i sistemi di monitoraggio e la capacità di risposta rapida in caso di guasti o minacce.
2. Condivisione delle informazioni: istituire canali di scambio e allerta precoce per garantire una comunicazione efficace e tempestiva tra le parti coinvolte.
3. Riforma del sistema: promuovere linee guida internazionali condivise e il rispetto delle convenzioni esistenti, come la Convenzione delle Nazioni Unite sul Diritto del Mare, aggiornandole se necessario.
4. Sviluppo delle competenze: organizzare formazioni, workshop e programmi di scambio per accrescere le capacità tecniche e operative dei Paesi interessati.

Lin ha concluso sottolineando che l’iniziativa si propone di creare una rete di cooperazione globale, capace di rafforzare la resilienza delle infrastrutture digitali e di proteggere un bene comune fondamentale dell’era moderna: la connettività globale.

L'articolo Taiwan lancia un’iniziativa internazionale per la sicurezza dei cavi sottomarini proviene da Red Hot Cyber.

Nel 2025 il port-scanning resta una delle attività chiave tanto per i Red Team (ricognizione, discovery, fingerprinting) quanto per i Blue Team (monitoraggio e difesa proattiva). Ma la novità di questi mesi è l’arrivo dei Large Language Models (LLM) integrati direttamente nel flusso di lavoro tecnico.

Uno degli esempi più interessanti è LLM-Tools-Nmap, presentato da Hackers Arise, che permette di pilotare Nmap tramite istruzioni in linguaggio naturale.

In pratica, il modello traduce la richiesta (“scansiona le porte web più comuni su questo /24 con velocità moderata e output in XML”) in un comando Nmap corretto e sicuro, includendo opzioni di timing, script NSE e limiti di scansione.

Kali Linux 2025.3 include già llm tra i pacchetti opzionali, e il plugin LLM-Tools-Nmap è disponibile su GitHub per integrazione manuale o automatica.

L’obiettivo è ridurre errori di sintassi, velocizzare i test e consentire all’AI di assistere gli operatori nella generazione, validazione e interpretazione dei risultati. È un concetto potente, ma che richiede — come sempre — controllo umano e policy chiare.

Perché Nmap è ancora il punto fermo

Nmap rimane lo standard de-facto per il port-scanning.
La sua documentazione, la prevedibilità del comportamento delle opzioni (-sS, -sV, -O, -T3), e la possibilità di usare script NSE dedicati rendono questo tool imprescindibile.

Conoscere il cheatsheet Nmap è essenziale per capire cosa succede davvero sul wire, diagnosticare falsi negativi, gestire firewall e IDS, e costruire baseline ripetibili.

Vantaggi del cheatsheet:

• Determinismo e trasparenza: ogni flag fa esattamente ciò che dichiara.
• Diagnostica: sapere interpretare perché una scansione fallisce.
• Ripetibilità: perfetto per training e testing controllato.

Dove l’AI accelera (ma non sostituisce)

L’AI, e in particolare LLM-Tools-Nmap, funziona come copilota intelligente:
interpreta comandi complessi, genera pipeline (masscan → nmap → parsing → report), prepara script di parsing (jq, Python) e persino trasforma output XML in report leggibili.
Può adattare la strategia di scanning ai risultati (ad esempio, avviare --script=http-enum solo se trova un webserver) e fornire sintesi utili ai SOC.

Limiti e rischi:

• L’AI non conosce policy, orari di manutenzione o impatti di rete: può proporre comandi aggressivi.
• Possibili “allucinazioni” di opzioni inesistenti.
• Automatizzare senza supervisione può creare rischi legali o operativi.

Workflow consigliato (approccio ibrido)

1. Formazione manuale: ogni operatore deve padroneggiare il cheatsheet Nmap.
2. AI come copilota: genera i comandi, ma non li esegue; revisione umana obbligatoria.
3. Automazione condizionata: script AI eseguibili solo su target autorizzati.
4. Guard rails: whitelist, rate-limit, log e backoff automatici.
5. Post-scan: normalizzazione output, comparazione con baseline, analisi dei cambiamenti.

Esempio pratico (solo in LAB)

Prompt AI (sicuro):

“Genera un comando Nmap per discovery TCP sulle porte 1–1024 su lab.example.local, timing moderato, max-retries 2, host-timeout 5m, output XML. Fornisci anche una versione meno invasiva.”

Output atteso:

nmap -sS -p 1-1024 -T3 --max-retries 2 --host-timeout 5m -oX scan_lab.xml lab.example.local
# alternativa meno invasiva:
nmap -sT -p 22,80,443 -T2 --open -oX scan_lab_small.xml lab.example.local

Cheatsheet rapido (estratto)

• -sS SYN scan (stealth)
• -sT TCP connect (non privilegiato)
• -sV Version detection
• -O OS detection
• -T0..T5 Timing aggressivo/lento
• Output: -oX, -oN, -oG, -oA
• NSE utili: --script=banner, --script=http-enum, --script=vuln
• Impatto ridotto: --max-retries, --host-timeout, --scan-delay

Conclusione

Il cheatsheet Nmap rimane la base per ogni operatore di sicurezza.

L’AI e strumenti come LLM-Tools-Nmap rappresentano un’ottima estensione: velocizzano, semplificano e aiutano nell’analisi. Ma non sostituiscono esperienza e responsabilità.

L’approccio migliore è ibrido: padronanza manuale + assistenza AI, sotto policy ben definite.

Riferimenti

• Hackers Arise — Artificial Intelligence in Cybersecurity: Using AI for Port Scanning (hackers-arise.com/artificial-i…)
• Documentazione ufficiale Nmap — Nmap Reference Guide
• Cheat sheet community — StationX, GitHub
• LLM-Tools-Nmap — progetto GitHub

L'articolo Port-scanning nel 2025: Nmap e AI — come integrarli in modo sicuro e operativo proviene da Red Hot Cyber.

Dear Friend of Press Freedom,

It’s been 220 days since Rümeysa Öztürk was arrested for co-writing an op-ed the government didn’t like. Read on for news from California, Washington D.C. and Maryland as the government shutdown drags on.

Public records are for the public

When Wired made public records-based stories free, subscriptions went up.

When 404 Media published reporting that relied on the Freedom of Information Act without a paywall, new sources came forward.

Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) spoke to Wired Global Editorial Director and FPF board member Katie Drummond, and 404 Media co-founder Joseph Cox about why giving the public access to public records reporting is good for journalism — and for business. Read more here.

Shutting down the government doesn’t shut down the First Amendment

It’s absurd and unconstitutional to exclude reporters from immigration hearings unless they get government permission to attend, especially when it’s impossible to obtain permission due to the government shutdown, and particularly when the current government despises First Amendment freedoms and will use any opportunity to evade transparency.

And yet that’s exactly what an immigration court in Maryland did this week. We wrote a detailed letter to the top judge at the courthouse explaining why they need to reverse course, both to comply with the law and for the sake of democracy. The next day, Capital News Service reported that the court had backed down and lifted the ban. Read the letter here.

No secret police in LA

Award-winning journalist Cerise Castle sued Los Angeles County in July and obtained a court order for the department to release the sheriff’s deputy ID photographs.

But now the county is appealing. Its objection to allowing the public to identify law enforcement officers is especially striking when Angelenos and others across the country are outraged by unidentified, masked federal immigration officers abducting their neighbors. It also comes on the heels of the city of Los Angeles embarrassing itself with its failed effort to sue a journalist for publishing officer photographs.

We connected with Castle’s lawyer, Susan Seager, to try to figure out what the department is thinking. Read more here.

Top three questions about the White House ballroom

FPF’s Daniel Ellsberg Chair on Government Secrecy Lauren Harper has lots of questions about the demolition of a section of the White House to construct a ballroom.

She wrote about three of them for our government secrecy site, The Classifieds: (1) Is there a budget? (2) Who are the donors, and what do they get in return? and (3) Where should we look for answers about what’s going on at the East Wing? Read more here.

What we’re reading

U.S. assessment of Israeli shooting of journalist divided American officials (The New York Times). A retired U.S. colonel has gone public with his concern that the Biden administration’s findings about the 2022 killing of Palestinian-American journalist Shireen Abu Akleh by the Israeli military were “soft-pedaled to appease Israel.” There has been “a miscarriage of justice,” he says.

ICE detains British journalist after criticism of Israel on US tour (The Guardian). The detention of Sami Hamdi by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement solely for his views while on a speaking tour in the U.S. is a blatant assault on free speech. These are the tactics of the thought police.

Trump and Leavitt watch with glee as the press is crumbling (Salon). “As the press becomes more subservient and less independent, the firsthand knowledge needed to even stage a fight to get our mojo back is a whisper in the ether,” writes Brian Karem. That’s why veteran journalists who know how abnormal this all is need to be extra vocal these days.

Atlanta journalist says he ‘won’t be the only’ one deported by Trump officials (The Guardian). “It’s not the way I wanted to come back to my country – deported like a criminal,” journalist Mario Guevara told Briana Erickson of FPF’s U.S. Press Freedom Tracker from El Salvador. Read The Guardian’s story, based on reporting by the Tracker.

One third of all journalists are creator journalists, new report finds (Poynter). It’s no time for gatekeeping. There aren’t enough traditional J-School trained journalists to adequately document every ICE abduction – let alone everything else going on. We appreciate everyone who is exercising their press freedom rights, no matter how they’re categorized.

RSVP

freedom.press/issues/public-re…

Award-winning journalist Cerise Castle has some history with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. In 2021, she chronicled how deputies formed violent gangs within the department. She then turned “A Tradition of Violence,” her 15-part series for Knock LA, into a podcast by the same name.

Perhaps that’s why the department was spooked when Castle submitted a Public Records Act request for names and official ID photographs of all sworn personnel, “excluding those in undercover assignments.” Or maybe the department was merely committed to following its routine practice of delaying and denying records requests.

In any case, the department produced the names of about 8,500 deputies but refused to produce any photographs except of the sheriff and his undersheriffs. They claimed that producing photographs of the deputies would violate their right to privacy and might endanger them in the future, if they ever go undercover.

But the department’s rationale seemed suspect because it also refused to comply with separate requests for headshots of three deputies who have been convicted of serious felonies, fired, and obviously won’t be sent on any future undercover operations for the department.

Castle won her Los Angeles County Superior Court Public Records Act lawsuit in July, and the court ordered the department to release the deputy ID photographs. But now the county is appealing. Its objection to allowing the public to identify law enforcement officers is especially striking when Angelenos and others across the country are outraged by unidentified, masked federal immigration officers abducting their neighbors.

The timing is also particularly odd after the California Legislature just enacted Sen. Scott Wiener’s new law, the No Secret Police Act, barring law enforcement officers operating in the state from masking their faces when working in public, beginning on Jan. 1, 2026.

We spoke to Castle’s lawyer, Susan Seager, to learn more about the case and her client’s opposition to the county’s appeal.

What is the county’s basis for its opposition to producing pictures of law enforcement officers who operate in public and serve the public at the public’s expense?

They claim that no deputy will ever work undercover again because if a deputy’s photo is posted online, and if that deputy works undercover in the future, and if a “criminal” uses facial recognition technology, then that future undercover deputy will be recognized by criminals. But the court rejected this argument because it’s all speculation. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge James Chalfant followed decisions by the California Supreme Court, such as Commission on Peace Officer Certification Standards and Training v. Superior Court, which held that ordinary police officers don’t have a right to privacy in their identities and mere “speculation” about safety risks to the general police force is not enough to block disclosure of public records containing individual police officers’ identities.

The top brass at the LA Sheriff’s Department don’t want their deputies to be accountable to the public they serve. The Sheriff’s Department fights all Public Records Act cases. It’s a knee-jerk reaction.

Susan Seager

Have similar arguments been rejected by the courts before?

No. As far as I know, this is the first case where a court decided that official police department officer ID photos are disclosable under the Public Records Act. The city of LA and city of Santa Ana both voluntarily gave journalist Ben Camacho official police officer ID photos in response to his Public Records Act legal actions, but they did so before a court ruled on his request. The LAPD photos are now online for public use at Watch the Watchers.

It seems notable that LA County is pursuing this appeal so soon after the city of Los Angeles wasted its time and the taxpayers’ money, and embarrassed itself in the Camacho case. Why is the county repeating the city’s mistakes?

The problem is that both the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors and the Los Angeles City Council appear to be very hands-off on the litigation against them, including cases involving their sheriff’s department and police department, respectively. The elected officials seem to let their lawyers make all the decisions on litigation strategies, appeals, etc., without asking for any updates or to be involved in any decisions to appeal in cases against the government agencies. LA’s elected officials need to take more control over litigation involving their police officers. They need to stop wasting taxpayer money fighting Public Records Act cases like this, especially after a superior court orders the police agency to release the records.

Many people in Los Angeles and around the country have been outraged in recent months by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents wearing masks, and other efforts by the Trump administration to discourage and even criminalize identifying law enforcement officers. What do you make of LA County litigating the right to keep deputies’ identities secret against that backdrop?

LA deputies probably wish they could wear masks as well. And the top brass at the LA Sheriff’s Department don’t want their deputies to be accountable to the public they serve. The Sheriff’s Department fights all Public Records Act cases. It’s a knee-jerk reaction. And the lawyers hired by the county don’t care about public accountability — they are hired to fight and win.

What’s your theory about why the county is pursuing this? Where is the pressure coming from? Do they seriously believe that this is a meritorious appeal that they have a real chance of winning? Or do they just not care because taxpayers are funding it?

This is typical for the county of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department. They fight all Public Records Act cases. In this case, there is extra pressure coming from the labor unions representing the deputies. The deputies’ labor unions actually joined in the case as intervenors, so we are fighting against the county and the labor unions.

If journalists are not able to obtain photos of law enforcement officers through public records requests, what kind of reporting will the public lose out on?

In the age of everyone carrying a smartphone and filming police, and posting images of police on social media or news sites, the public and the press can use those images to identify officers and investigate their past history. There may be instances where deputies use excessive force or threaten members of the public, but the victim doesn’t know the name of the deputy. Photographs help identify officers.

freedom.press/issues/la-sherif…