Goodbye, Mr. Higgs
https://noblogo.org/ulaulaman/goodbye-mr
Apprendo, giusto poco prima delle 21 (poco dopo l'uscita del post odierno su DropSea), della scomparsa di Peter Higgs. Mi ha colpito, ma forse per via della veneranda età, non come mi aspettavo, però il suo nome è legato a molti ricordi personali, che cercherò di raccontare nel seguito.
@scienza@feddit.it @scienza@a.gup.pe
#fisica #meccanicaquantistica #PeterHiggs
Goodbye, Mr. Higgs
Apprendo, giusto poco prima delle 21 (poco dopo l'uscita del post odierno su DropSea), della scomparsa di Peter Higgs. Mi ha colpito, m...L'isola di Ula-Ula
like this
eggymachus, ulaulaman, Fridayj, Mighty_Appititey, Informa Pirata, Gloria, Poliverso, tigeruppercut, geekwithsoul, Diplomjodler3, apj2k36, copymyjalopy, justdoitlater, disheveledWallaby, Dr_Vegapunk, ArtikBanana, HEXN3T, Disgruntled, Digital_man, Heliumfart, Synthuir, zzz711, WhiskyPriest, remotelove, Vanadio_Scaraf, linucs, Someonelol, ailiphilia, Macallan, Slayan, hairyfeet, Nofearfrontier, Heydo, smegforbrains, felykiosa e joseandres42 like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, macfranc e informapirata :privacypride: reshared this.
Piracy Shield, Stefano Zanero: “Ecco perché bloccare gli IP è una pessima idea”
@raistlin professore ordinario di Computer Security e Digital Forensics and Cybercrime del Politecnico di Milano risponde all’intervento del Commissario Agcom Massimiliano Capitanio in merito al “Piracy Shield”, la piattaforma Agcom contro la diffusione online di contenuti illegali
Piracy Shield, Zanero: “Ecco perché bloccare gli IP è una pessima idea”
Stefano Zanero, professore ordinario di Computer Security e Digital Forensics and Cybercrime del Politecnico di Milano risponde all'intervento del Commissario Agcom Massimiliano Capitanio in merito al "Piracy Shield", la piattaforma Agcom contro la d…Stefano Zanero (Agenda Digitale)
like this
The Pirate Post, Vanadio_Scaraf, kylie_kraft, Ryoma123, Someonelol, Rozaŭtuno, sposadelvento, Peppe Failla, StellaFangX e lambda like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, Pirati.io, Stefano Zanero, Andrea Bontempi, The Pirate Post, Gazzetta del Cadavere, Pëtr Arkad'evič Stolypin, Fabio Tavano, Giuseppe Aceto e RFanciola reshared this.
Bloccare gli IP a vita è estremamente stupido. Non sono di proprietà di chi li utilizza per ospitare contenuti che violano copyright, ma solo usati in prestito. Bloccato? Va bè ne apro un altro con un clic 5 minuti dopo.
Non risolve assolutamente nulla, è come tentare di combattere lo spaccio nelle piazze con un bombardiere: colpirai esclusivamente gli innocenti
frippa likes this.
Eh, caro il mio Stefano: non vorrai mica che ascoltino gli esperti, scusa!
🙄 l'importante è il pallone, internet è per i porni 😅, quindi se la blocchiano va bene, no?!
Quando capiranno che gli esperti servono anche in tutti gli altri ambiti e non solo al bar (o alla bouvette...) e come allenatori di calcio, sarà sempre troppo tardi.
reshared this
informapirata :privacypride: reshared this.
E se subisco un danno?
Almeno si può sapere chi mi ha fatto bloccare, per chiedere i danni?
frippa likes this.
reshared this
informapirata :privacypride: reshared this.
reshared this
informapirata :privacypride: reshared this.
Caro @mariosiniscalchi, sei un ragazzo sveglio. Dovresti iniziare a emanciparti da questa idea egualitaria per cui i privati contano tutti allo stesso modo...
Il corporativismo è nel DNA cellulare di questo governo e in quello mitocondriale del nostro Paese
Questa polizia del web privata?
E come ci si diventa?
No, perchè se tutti posson segnalare tutti io avrei qualche dispetto pronto! 😄
@mariosiniscalchi non serve segnalare, ma pr bloccare un IP devi avere certezza che da quell'IP viene trasmesso un contenuto pirata.
Tuttavia non escluderei che qualche simpaticone abbia già iniziato a individuare qualche indirizzo ip sensibile (partiti, ministeri, ASL e Ospedali, aziende partecipate o banche) per poi trasmettere qualche partita top e spammare pubblicità nel web così da farsi bloccare
dalla lettura dell'articolo si può supporre che potrà essere usata ,anche , come censura politica.
come avviene, tecnicamente, il blocco del ip pubblico?
frippa likes this.
@sevensnd link testuale con indicazioni di massima: https://www.wired.it/article/piracy-shield-piattaforma-agcom-pezzotto-streaming-illegale/
link video con spiegazione più articolata: https://www.youtube.com/live/BGRiuTPDrmY?si=khum40INreYPXD6L
Piracy Shield, come funziona la piattaforma nazionale per oscurare lo streaming illegale
È stata donata dalla Lega serie A all'Autorità delle comunicazione e l'ha sviluppata una startup legata allo studio legale Previti. Al via le prime prove. Ma nessuno ha pensato di acquistare il dominio piracyshield.net, usato nelle credenziali.Raffaele Angius (Wired Italia)
Talia likes this.
like this
Peppe Failla, Informa Pirata e frippa like this.
Informa Pirata likes this.
Benvenuti nell'era del tecnofeudalesimo! L'intervista di Wired a Yanis Varoufakis
Nell'ultimo libro di Yanis Varoufakis, l'ex ministro delle finanze greco sostiene che aziende come Apple e Meta hanno trattato i loro utenti come moderni servi della gleba
https://www.wired.com/story/yanis-varoufakis-technofeudalism-interview/
like this
Vanadio_Scaraf, Sasha, ailiphilia, OpusSpike e voxaelfox like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata reshared this.
reshared this
informapirata :privacypride:, Paolo Redaelli e RFanciola reshared this.
ailiphilia likes this.
Non sono convinto che il Prof #AlessandroBarbero approverebbe l'analogia col feudalesimo, che era soprattutto un modo di amministrare il territorio, non solo per vessare di tasse gli altri.
Comunque è chiaro che il trend delle compagnie tecnologiche è sfruttare gratuitamente il lavoro degli altri, che sia opensource o il video delle vacanze. Ci sono molteplici livelli, non è solo questo o quello.
C'è il capitalismo di sorveglianza, ci sono i Baroni mendicanti e poi c'è anche questo aspetto del tecnofeudalesimo. Tanto per rimarcare che il turbocapitalismo (cit.) è molto più aggressivo e agguerrito che mai!
Sì, sembra così, anche se non sono sicuro che la nostra attuale forma di capitalismo sia "rovesciata" come suggerisce Varoufakis secondo l'articolo di Wired (non ho Letto il libro).
In poche parole, direi piuttosto che si tratta di un'ulteriore concentrazione di capitale, che abbiamo osservato fin dalla prima rivoluzione industriale. Probabilmente la velocità di questa concentrazione è molto più alta di quanto non fosse prima (Frederick Taylor e Henry Ford celebrerebbero oggi), ma è ancora lo stesso sviluppo. Questo suggeriscono anche Meijas e Couldry.
Ad esempio, la sorveglianza è una delle principali caratteristiche della gestione moderna e ha sicuramente raggiunto livelli senza precedenti. Tuttavia, non è una nuova intuizione. Anche Karl Marx ha osservato nel 19 º secolo che la sorveglianza è un importante strumento di gestione capitalistica come da lui inteso (disclaimer: Sono per lo più d'accordo con l'analisi economica di Marx, ma non con le implementazioni politiche, né nel XX né nel XXI secolo; il cosiddetto comunismo e qualsiasi centralizzazione dell'economia era e sarà un errore e un fallimento).
Quindi non è una "rivoluzione", ma piuttosto lo stesso sviluppo a mio modesto parere. Ma forse sono pignolo.
Greylock McKinnon Associates, un fornitore di servizi per il Dipartimento di Giustizia, ha subito una violazione dei dati che ha esposto i dati di 341650 persone.
La violazione dei dati ha avuto un impatto su Medicare e altre informazioni appartenenti a 5465 persone.
https://securityaffairs.com/161592/data-breach/greylock-mckinnon-associates-data-breach.html
Greylock McKinnon Associates data breach exposed DOJ data of 341650 people
Greylock McKinnon Associates, a service provider for the Department of Justice, suffered a data breach that exposed data of 341650 people.Pierluigi Paganini (Security Affairs)
like this
Poliverso e Vanadio_Scaraf like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata reshared this.
Sorveglianza come servizio: l’impatto globale delle tecnologie di “difesa” israeliane sulla privacy e sui diritti umani
Evidenziare, denunciare e lavorare attivamente contro la proliferazione e la normalizzazione della tecnologia di sorveglianza è fondamentale per proteggere i diritti umani in tutto il mondo.
Il post di @torproject
Surveillance as a Service: The Global Impact of Israeli “Defense” Technologies on Privacy and Human Rights | Tor Project
There is a growing need for a global stance against the use of technology for oppression. This post delves into the impact of Israeli surveillance technologies in Palestine and how localized instances of its use contribute to widespread acceptance an…blog.torproject.org
like this
Poliverso, Vanadio_Scaraf e StellaFangX like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata reshared this.
Dignitas infinita per Purgatorium digitale
Avviso contenuto: Ecco perché non ci sono piaciuti i capitoli dedicati all'impatto delle tecnologie digitali (Violenza digitale) sulla dignità umana, della “Dignitas infinita circa la dignità umana”, ossia la dichiarazione del Dicastero per la Dottrina della Fede
Riportiamo alcune nostre considerazioni sui capitoli conclusivi, dedicati all’impatto delle tecnologie digitali (Violenza digitale) sulla dignità umana, della “Dignitas infinita circa la dignità umana”, ossia la dichiarazione del Dicastero per la Dottrina della Fede, presieduto dal Cardinale Víctor Manuel Fernández. Sebbene condividiamo le preoccupazioni verso una tecnologia digitale…
Ecco perché non ci sono piaciuti i capitoli dedicati all’impatto delle tecnologie digitali (Violenza digitale) sulla dignità umana, della “Dignitas infinita circa la dignità umana”, ossia la dichiarazione del Dicastero per la Dottrina della Fedehttps://www.informapirata.it/2024/04/08/dignitas-infinita-per-purgatorium-digitale/
Dignitas infinita per Purgatorium digitale - informapirata
Ecco perché non ci sono piaciuti i capitoli dedicati all’impatto delle tecnologie digitali (Violenza digitale) sulla dignità umana, della “Dignitas infinita…informapirata
Un databreach fa trapelare centinaia di migliaia di numeri di previdenza sociale
Per dare un po'di contesto negli USA il social security number é uno dei dati personali più importanti, è molto di più del nostro codice fiscale
like this
Poliverso, LievitoPadre e Vanadio_Scaraf like this.
LievitoPadre doesn't like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata reshared this.
Il concorrente X di Meta, Threads, invita gli sviluppatori a registrarsi per l'accesso API e pubblica documenti
Dopo aver aperto la sua API per sviluppatori per selezionare aziende da testare a marzo , Threads, concorrente di Meta su Twitter/X, sta ora introducendo la documentazione per gli sviluppatori e un foglio di registrazione per le parti interessate prima del lancio pubblico dell'API, previsto per giugno
Vanadio_Scaraf likes this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata reshared this.
Ecco perché non ci sono piaciuti i capitoli dedicati all’impatto delle tecnologie digitali (Violenza digitale) sulla dignità umana, della “Dignitas infinita circa la dignità umana”, ossia la dichiarazione del Dicastero per la Dottrina della Fede
https://www.informapirata.it/2024/04/08/dignitas-infinita-per-purgatorium-digitale/
Dignitas infinita per Purgatorium digitale - informapirata
Ecco perché non ci sono piaciuti i capitoli dedicati all’impatto delle tecnologie digitali (Violenza digitale) sulla dignità umana, della “Dignitas infinita…informapirata
like this
Poliverso, n3m37h, Vanadio_Scaraf, Tramort e StellaFangX like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, Pirati.io, informapirata :privacypride:, macfranc e Poliverso :friendica: reshared this.
Pirates call for a halt to plans for the EU health data space
Avviso contenuto: The lead committees of the European Parliament, LIBE and ENVI, are to give their final nod to the regulation on the creation of a “European Health Data Space” (EHDS) tomorrow. According …
The lead committees of the European Parliament, LIBE and ENVI, are to give their final nod to the regulation on the creation of a “European Health Data Space” (EHDS) tomorrow. According to this regulation, information on all medical treatment, including vaccination status, medication and pregnancies, laboratory and discharge reports, is to be stored digitally for all patients – including privately insured patients who are currently not covered by the electronic patient file in Germany. These files will be accessible to a large number of organisations throughout Europe. As shadow rapporteur and co-negotiator of the regulation for the Committee on Home Affairs (LIBE), Pirate Party MEP Dr. Patrick Breyer, warns of a loss of control by patients over sensitive health data and a loss of medical confidentiality.
“Information about our physical and mental health is extremely sensitive. If we cannot rely on this information being treated confidentially by our doctors, we may no longer seek treatment and may even increase the risk of suicide. The EU is allowing the most sensitive patient files to be accumulated, networked and passed on without ensuring that patients have control and self-determination over their data. ‘Anything goes, nothing has to’ is not an approach that patients can trust. Without trust, a European Health Data Space cannot work. According to surveys, more than 80% of EU citizens want to decide for themselves about the sharing of their patient records. The majority of them want to be asked for consent. The EU deal is far from this. It betrays the interests and will of patients in order to sell their data to Big Tech and pharmaceutical giants. We Pirates strongly reject the disenfranchisement of patients that this regulation entails.
A Europe-wide obligation to use electronic patient records was prevented, among other things, thanks to my initiative. According to Article 8h and Recital 13a of the Regulation, the German and Austrian right to object to the establishment of an electronic patient file has been preserved. In the event of an objection, the mandatory information will only be stored by the treating doctor. I myself will object to this electronic patient file so as not to lose control over my health data. However, we know that very few patients who object to external access to their data actually go through the complicated objection procedure.
Anyone who does not object to the electronic patient file or its analysis as a whole will probably also inevitably allow cross-border access to it by foreign practitioners, researchers, and governments. The right to object specifically to cross-border data access planned by the German government is not provided for in the regulation in a legally secure manner. This is contrary to the interests and wishes of patients, only a minority of whom, according to opinion polls, want cross-border access to their patient records across Europe. Moreover, it does not come close to doing justice to the sensitivity of health data, which ranges from addictions, mental disorders, and abortions to sexually transmitted diseases and reproductive disorders.
Furthermore, the regulation is designed to maximise the exploitation of our personal health data and does not serve the interests of patients. Contrary to the European Parliament’s original position, for example, sensitive health data does not have to be stored in Europe, meaning that non-European storage in US cloud services, for example, is also permitted. The EU Parliament has also abandoned its call for independent certification of the security of European health data systems.
The EU regulation does not require Germany to protect health data any better than the German government has decided. In future, doctors treating patients throughout Europe will be able to view their entire patient file without their consent – unless they explicitly object. In future, health ministries and health authorities, universities, technology companies, and the pharmaceutical industry will also have access to anonymised and personally identifiable (only pseudonymised) patient files throughout Europe without the patient’s consent – unless the patient expressly objects. In Germany, there is no right to object to the disclosure of medical register data records and billing data records. Patients are only asked for their consent before their genetic data is accessed, but not for information on psychological and addiction therapies, abortions, sexual, and reproductive disorders. For us Pirates, patient control over their data and the protection of medical confidentiality take centre stage, so that access to treatment records by third parties is only acceptable after obtaining patient consent.“
Anja Hirschel, medical computer scientist and top candidate of the Pirate Party for the 2024 European elections, adds: “Centralised data storage awakens desires in a wide variety of directions. However, this does not only entail hacker attacks, but also so-called ‘secondary use’. This refers to access that is to be granted in full for research purposes. The patient data is then to be passed on to third parties. From a data protection perspective, even the centralised collection of data is problematic, and at least an opt-in procedure (active consent) is the right way to go. This would allow each individual a certain degree of decision-making autonomy over their personal data. However, if not even an opt-out procedure (active objection) is established, this ultimately means the abolition of the confidentiality of all medical information. And this despite the fact that doctors in Germany are rightly subject to professional confidentiality in accordance with Section 203 of the German Criminal Code (StGB), as are, among others, lawyers. This protection of our most private information and the right to confidential care and counselling are now at stake.“
The German government supports the EU plans. In contrast, the European Consumer Organisation BEUC and the data protection network EDRi have criticised them.
https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/pirates-call-for-a-halt-to-plans-for-the-eu-health-data-space/
Pirates ask EU Commission to look into killing of video games
Avviso contenuto: Pirate Party MEP Patrick Breyer has asked the European Commission for an opinion on the decision by French computer game manufacturer Ubisoft to make the popular computer game “The Crew 1” …
Pirate Party MEP Patrick Breyer has asked the European Commission for an opinion on the decision by French computer game manufacturer Ubisoft to make the popular computer game “The Crew 1” unusable from April 2024. In Breyer’s opinion, this measure could violate EU law. Meanwhile an initiative centred around the Youtuber Ross Scott has formed to oppose the destruction of video games (stopkillinggames.com).
MEP Patrick Breyer explains:
“The shutdown of ‘The Crew 1′ by Ubisoft is an alarming example of how gamers’ interests are being ignored. It is unacceptable and probably also illegal for companies to first sell popular games at a profit and then kill them at short notice. Pirates demand a legal framework that prevents orphaned software from simply disappearing. The community should have the opportunity to take orphaned software over and develop it further. This policy also promotes sustainability, for example by allowing control routines for hardware to be maintained and updated, which increases the service life of the devices.
Software is more than just a product on the shelf. Computer games in particular are an integral part of our digital culture. At my request, the EU Commission must now clarify whether Ubisoft’s actions are in conflict with current EU consumer protection law and which limits exist for computer game manufacturers when killing previously sold games.”
Breyer’s written question to the EU Commission tabled on Friday in full:
“The French computer game manufacturer Ubisoft distributed the game The Crew 1 until December 2023. However, by shutting down its servers, it will no longer be playable from April 2024.
- is this action in breach of EU law?
- which limits does EU law generally place on computer game manufacturers when decommissioning previously sold computer games?
- which authorities are responsible for enforcing the regulations?”
https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/pirates-ask-eu-commission-to-look-into-killing-of-video-games/
OpenAI, Google e Meta hanno ignorato le politiche aziendali, modificato le proprie regole e discusso di come aggirare la legge sul copyright per addestrare le loro IA
La corsa per guidare l’intelligenza artificiale è diventata una caccia disperata ai dati digitali necessari per far avanzare la tecnologia. Secondo un’analisi del New York Times, per ottenere tali dati, le aziende tecnologiche hanno violato tutto ciò che potevano violare
@aitech
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/06/technology/tech-giants-harvest-data-artificial-intelligence.html?unlocked_article_code=1.ik0.RaCf.bqzjdn7Qj4Gg
Ryoma123 likes this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, not ready, RFanciola, bomby e Thomas Blechschmidt reshared this.
like this
skariko e Pëtr Arkad'evič Stolypin like this.
reshared this
informapirata :privacypride: reshared this.
reshared this
informapirata :privacypride: reshared this.
reshared this
informapirata :privacypride: e Quoll :liberapay: reshared this.
Mi è cambiato il colore del tema. Cos'è successo?
Informa Pirata likes this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata reshared this.
Andrea Russo likes this.
"Didattica al cubo": l'8 aprile 2024, h.17:00-19:00 divertimento e didattica con Minetest. Crossposting da @informapirata
Lunedì 8 aprile 2024, alle 17:00-19:00 @zughy terrà un incontro presso il Liceo Scientifico “Toniolo” ed in contemporanea in videoconferenza; il corso “Didattica al cubo” esploderà le interessanti potenzialità didattiche di #Minetest.
Ingresso libero.
Iscrizione al seguente link:
https://fuss.bz.it/post/2024-03-21_didattica-al-cubo/
like this
Informa Pirata, Antonella Ferrari e Andrea Russo like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, Eleonora, Adrianaaaa, Gatta Cikova :verified:, Antonella Ferrari, L'Anarchiversitario, Andrea Russo, Gabriele Ponzo, Videogiochi e Alfonso :verified: reshared this.
"Didattica al cubo": divertimento e didattica con Minetest
Lunedì 8 aprile 2024, alle 17:00-19:00 @zughy terrà un incontro presso il Liceo Scientifico “Toniolo” ed in contemporanea in videoconferenza; il corso “Didattica al cubo” esploderà le interessanti potenzialità didattiche di #Minetest.
Ingresso libero.
Iscrizione al seguente link:
https://fuss.bz.it/post/2024-03-21_didattica-al-cubo/
Poliverso - notizie dal fediverso likes this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, Zughy, Tedesfo @ LinuxItaliaGaming, FabioL 🥷, Poliverso - notizie dal fediverso, macfranc, 0ut1°°k, Gabriele Ponzo, Alfonso :verified:, tek e Simone Zanella reshared this.
Alzheimer chiama Europa. L'appello per riportare la demenza al centro dell’agenda politica dell’Europa
La demenza è la 3a causa di mortalità in Europa e la 7a a livello globale, con un costo sociale in Europa di 392 miliardi di euro nel 2019
Con 41 organizzazioni di persone con demenza e loro familiari in 36 Paesi, abbiamo individuato delle azioni concrete che la politica deve impegnarsi a realizzare: sono raccolte nel Manifesto di Helsinki
@politica
Per partecipare:
https://alzheimerchiamaeuropa.it/
Alzheimer chiama Europa - La forza di non essere soli
Unisciti all’appello di Alzeimer Europe e Federazione Alzheimer Italia per chiedere che la demenza venga considerata una priorità politica.Federazione Italiana Alzheimer
like this
Antonella Ferrari, Franc Mac, Andrea Russo, Francesca Martini, Poliverso, Informapirata e Lorenzo like this.
smokingManhole doesn't like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, Pirati.io, macfranc, 0ut1°°k, Eleonora, Gatta Cikova :verified:, Adrianaaaa, Giorgio Sarto, L'Anarchiversitario, Antonella Ferrari, Franc Mac, Francesca Martini, Andrea Russo, Lorenzo, ParoleSparse🍄🦄 e Thomas Blechschmidt reshared this.
I 14 anni di Collateral Murder: la vendetta dei colpevoli si è abbattuta su Julian Assange, costretto a una reclusione sproporzionata
Oggi ricorre il 14° anno dalla pubblicazione da parte di #WikiLeaks del vide #CollateralMurder di Julian Assange che mostrava l'uccisione di civili in Iraq.
Assange rischia una condanna a 175 anni se estradato negli Stati Uniti per le sue pubblicazioni nell'interesse pubblico
#FreeAssangeNOW
https://i.devol.it/watch?v=2e3NbrTriQE
Collateral Murder - Julian Assange, journalism on trial (Part 2) - Presadiretta
https://www.raiplay.it/collezioni/julianassangejournalismontrial/ - Riccardo Iacona examines the judicial proceedings made against Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks.Rai | Invidious
like this
MelastSB e Vanadio_Scaraf like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata reshared this.
Digiunare dai social durante il Ramadan. L'articolo di @violastefanello su Il Post
Alcune persone musulmane scelgono di usare il mese dell'astinenza e della preghiera per disintossicarsi dagli aspetti meno sani della vita online
like this
Dieguito 🦝 e Vanadio_Scaraf like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata e Viola Stefanello 👩💻 reshared this.
Che siano i social, i dolci, o altro
Il Consiglio per il commercio e la tecnologia Ue-Stati Uniti porta buoni frutti. Ma ora è in pausa per le rispettive elezioni
Il punto sui principali dossier prima delle rispettive elezioni alla sesta riunione del Consiglio per il commercio e la tecnologia Ue-Stati UnitiFederico Baccini @federicobaccini (Eunews)
LordMax likes this.
Un hacker vigilante ha messo fuori uso la rete Internet della Corea del Nord. Ora si sta togliendo la maschera
Come “P4x”, Alejandro Caceres da solo ha sconvolto Internet di un intero paese. Poi ha cercato di mostrare all’esercito americano come può – e dovrebbe – adottare i suoi metodi.
https://www.wired.com/story/p4x-north-korea-internet-hacker-identity-reveal/
like this
Dieguito 🦝, Vanadio_Scaraf, Ryoma123 e Peepee Confiscator / Kaca Konfiskisto like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, Alfonso :verified:, El Salvador e Devil :verified: reshared this.
Non è che se sei fortemente contrario al governo di uno stato sei autorizzato a fare certe cose.
marci33 likes this.
don't like this
Peepee Confiscator / Kaca Konfiskisto e vergot don't like this.
Se poi si tratta di uno stato criminale, allora vale tutto
like this
Peepee Confiscator / Kaca Konfiskisto, skariko e StellaFangX like this.
«A brigante, brigante e mezzo»
Cosa hanno in comune le città di Catanzaro (dal versante opposizione) e Lucca (dal versante maggioranza)? Nulla. Anzi sì.Redazione Corriere (Corriere della Calabria)
Capisco l'argomentazione, ma il contesto è troppo differente e diventa pericoloso pensarla così. Allora vale tutto, finché ognuno pensa che dall'altra parte ci sia un nemico.
Non è una difesa al governo della DPKR, la mia, ma per quanto si possa criticare il governo di uno stato non mi sembra ragionevole condonare condotte criminali a tappeto da parte di un civile di un paese estero.
Già sarebbe diverso se fosse un cittadino locale o se fosse stata un'azione mirata a singoli individui. Ma l'intera rete internet governativa? Siamo seri?
Andrebbe bene distruggere la rete idrica degli Emirati Arabi perché sono una monarchia (anche molto più spietata del DPKR di sicuro)? O far saltare le telecomunicazioni in tutta la Russia perché Putin è stato eletto con una farsa (ed è un leader terribile)?
Non scherziamo dai.
@Kir no, non scherziamo affatto. La NK è uno stato canaglia che sferra cyberattacchi a istituzioni e aziende di tutti i paesi occidentali
> Andrebbe bene distruggere la rete idrica degli Emirati Arabi perché sono...?
Perché no? 😅
> (anche molto più spietata del DPKR di sicuro)
Non è più spietata della NK
> O far saltare le telecomunicazioni in tutta la Russia perché Putin...
Sì, ma solo se sei pronto a pagarne le conseguenze...
StellaFangX likes this.
Agree to disagree.
Stai praticamente dicendo che chiunque dovrebbe sentirsi autorizzato a fare qualsiasi danno ad altri popoli sulla base del giudizio personale sul governo di quel popolo.
A me sembra estremamente arrogante
@Kir distinguere il governo dal popolo è un approccio sostanzialmente corretto, ma nel caso della Corea del Nord siamo in presenza di un governo che sfrutta tutti i cittadini per l'autoperpetuazione, basa la propria strategia sul cyberattacco indiscriminato verso le nostre istituzioni, i nostri ospedali, le nostre aziende e i nostri conti correnti.
L'attivismo hacker contro la Corea del Nord è, oltre che comprensibile, arrogantemente virtuoso e intrinsecamente etico
StellaFangX likes this.
Questa è un'opinione, francamente molto discutibile, ed è appunto il problema che evidenziavo.
È lo stesso principio che usa Israele per giustificare quello che sta facendo sul popolo palestinese.
Non ho detto che la situazione è la stessa, ci mancherebbe, ho detto che il principio legittimante sottostante è lo stesso.
Se diciamo che quando riteniamo che un governo di un altro stato sia inadatto, siamo legittimati a compiere atti di violenza diretta o indiretta contro il suo popolo, poi questo è quello che succede.
A me sembra gravissimo e arrogante.
La classica "esportazione della democrazia" all'americana che è un neocolonialismo schifoso ed ipocrita (non mi è sfuggito il tuo termine "stato canaglia", che richiama bene il fondamento ideologico sottostante).
Poi ho capito che per te non è così, ma pace.
@Kir
> governo di un altro stato sia inadatto
Non inadatto, ma esistenzialmente pericoloso (oltre ad altre simpatiche conseguenze)
> A me sembra gravissimo e arrogante.
Ritorsioni e rappresaglie sono azioni lecite e contemplate dal diritto internazionale
> La classica “esportazione della democrazia”
che non c'entra una fava con ciò che stiamo discutendo
> è un neocolonialismo schifoso
Mmm... ma proprio no!
> stato canaglia
La NK è l'unico stato che interpreti alla perfezione il ruolo
A dire la verità Snowden é quello che si é salvato, a Manning é andata peggio (si é fatto la galera) e a Assange é andata MOLTO peggio.
A Pavia i soccorritori del 118 avranno le bodycam contro le aggressioni
Medici e infermieri potranno accenderle in caso di necessità e i video potranno poi essere acquisiti per eventuali indagini
https://www.ilpost.it/2024/04/04/bodycam-aggressioni-medici-pavia/
like this
DigitalDruid, Vanadio_Scaraf e Ryoma123 like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, Joe Vinegar e MajDen👠🎗☮️ ♀️🎨 reshared this.
Procura europea e Guardia di Finanza scoprono una maxi-frode sui fondi PNRR
Nel contesto di un’indagine internazionale su larga scala condotta dalla Procura europea (EPPO) a Venezia (Italia) e dalla Guardia di finanza italiana è stato scoperto un sistema di frode internazionale che ha portato a sequestri preventivi di ingente valore
@news
like this
Cano, Vanadio_Scaraf, mapto, Rozaŭtuno e iam0day like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata e :sailfish: Must o don't? ⭐️ reshared this.
Riordinare le sedie a sdraio sul Titanic: l’ultima mossa del Belgio non risolve i problemi critici con il regolamento CSA dell’UE
Avviso contenuto: La rete EDRi sollecita da tempo i legislatori dell’Unione Europea (UE) a garantire che gli sforzi per combattere l’OCSEA (sfruttamento e abuso sessuale di minori online) siano legali, efficaci e tecnicamente fattibili. L’obiettivo di proteggere i bambini
Riportiamo la traduzione del post pubblicato oggi sul sito di EDRi Avviso sui contenuti: contiene riferimenti all’abuso e allo sfruttamento sessuale dei minori La rete EDRi sollecita da tempo i legislatori dell’Unione Europea (UE) a garantire che gli sforzi per combattere l’OCSEA (sfruttamento e abuso sessuale di minori online) siano legali, efficaci e tecnicamente fattibili.
La rete EDRi sollecita da tempo i legislatori dell’Unione Europea (UE) a garantire che gli sforzi per combattere l’OCSEA (sfruttamento e abuso sessuale di minori online) siano legali, efficaci e tecnicamente fattibili. L’obiettivo di proteggere i bambini online è vitale. Ciò può essere fatto solo se le misure proposte funzionano e sono compatibili con i […]Riordinare le sedie a sdraio sul Titanic: l’ultima mossa del Belgio non risolve i problemi critici con il regolamento CSA dell’UE - informapirata
La rete EDRi sollecita da tempo i legislatori dell’Unione Europea (UE) a garantire che gli sforzi per combattere l’OCSEA (sfruttamento e abuso sessuale di…informapirata
La rete EDRi sollecita da tempo i legislatori dell’Unione Europea (UE) a garantire che gli sforzi per combattere l’OCSEA (sfruttamento e abuso sessuale di minori online) siano legali, efficaci e tecnicamente fattibili. L’obiettivo di proteggere i bambini online è vitale. Ciò può essere fatto solo se le misure proposte funzionano e sono compatibili con i […]
Riordinare le sedie a sdraio sul Titanic: l’ultima mossa del Belgio non risolve i problemi critici con il regolamento CSA dell’UE - informapirata
La rete EDRi sollecita da tempo i legislatori dell’Unione Europea (UE) a garantire che gli sforzi per combattere l’OCSEA (sfruttamento e abuso sessuale di…informapirata
like this
Poliverso, Dieguito 🦝 e Vanadio_Scaraf like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, informapirata :privacypride:, macfranc, Poliverso :friendica:, Privacy Pride e Pirati.io reshared this.
Washington e Bruxelles sembrano il meme di SpiderMan... Ecco la newsletter DigitalBridge di Mark Scott
– 3 anni dopo Bruxelles e Washingtonsono sempre più simili
— Il nuovo regime di concorrenza europeo è il “fantasma del futuro del Natale” per la causa antitrust del Dipartimento di Giustizia degli USA contro Apple
— Non tutti i tentativi di tenere a freno le forme più avanzate di intelligenza artificiale dovrebbero essere giudicati allo stesso modo
How Washington and Brussels became a Spider-Man meme
POLITICO's weekly transatlantic tech newsletter uncovers the digital relationship between critical power-centers through exclusive insights and breaking news for global technology elites and political influencers.Mark Scott (POLITICO)
like this
Duamerthrax, Dieguito 🦝 e Vanadio_Scaraf like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata reshared this.
How Washington and Brussels became a Spider-Man meme
Avviso contenuto: IT’S THURSDAY, AND THAT MEANS ANOTHER DIGITAL BRIDGE. I’m Mark Scott, POLITICO’s chief technology correspondent, and as the great and the good of the transatlantic digital policy world gather on the outskirts of Brussels, you find me filing this dispatch
POLITICO’s weekly transatlantic tech newsletter uncovers the digital relationship between critical power-centers through exclusive insights and breaking news for global technology elites and political influencers.
By MARK SCOTT
Send tips here | Subscribe for free | View in your browser
IT’S THURSDAY, AND THAT MEANS ANOTHER DIGITAL BRIDGE. I’m Mark Scott, POLITICO’s chief technology correspondent, and as the great and the good of the transatlantic digital policy world gather on the outskirts of Brussels, you find me filing this dispatch from Seattle. Go figure.
Enough of the bellyaching. Let’s get to it:
— Three years into the EU-U.S. revamp, Brussels is now more like Washington, and Washington is quickly turning into Brussels.
— Europe’s new competition regime is the “ghost of Christmas future” for the U.S. Department of Justice’s antitrust lawsuit against Apple.
— Not everyone’s attempts to rein in the most advanced forms of artificial intelligence should be judged equally.
WHEN DIGITAL POLICYMAKING ENTERS THE SPIDER-RVERSE
THERE’S A POPULAR MEME OF TWO SPIDER-MEN pointing at each other often used when people want to show how things are alike — even identical. That’s the feeling I get looking at what will be announced at the latest (and possibly last?) EU-U.S. Trade and Technology Council (TTC), a two-day summit that starts Thursday in Leuven, a city just outside Brussels. Officials including U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and European Commission digital chief Margrethe Vestager will meet to reinforce how closely the United States and European Union now view digital policymaking. What’s clear is that over the past three years, Washington and Brussels have rubbed off on each other, sometimes in surprising ways.
Before we get into that — and what that means going forward — let’s do a quick run-through of what will be announced Friday. My colleagues did a pretty good job in last week’s newsletter. But to recap, expected announcements include: greater collaboration on artificial intelligence between the U.S. AI Safety Institute and Commission’s AI Office; closer ties on so-called 6G next-generation telecommunications standards (in part, to push back against China); a three-year continuation of information-sharing on semiconductor supply chains and government subsidies; an agreement to further cooperate against Russian- and Chinese-backed influence operations, with a name check for the Western Balkans; a commitment to joint fund telecom and cybersecurity projects in the Global South, including a new deal in Tunisia; and demands that online platforms protect so-called human rights defenders and give outsiders greater access to social media data.
Phew. However, if you take a step back from this week’s glad-handing, it’s mostly a piecemeal approach to everything from quantum computing and critical emerging technologies to social media and artificial intelligence oversight. In short: It sounds like a lot. But if you think of the gamut of topics to be discussed — over a lavish dinner, public fireside chat and behind-the-scenes meetings — the summit’s outcomes aren’t that spectacular. I would argue that’s a good thing. If you’re going to reforge a once-faulty transatlantic relationship, it’s better to get lost in the wonkery of digital policymaking. Don’t get caught up in “moon shot” announcements that can lead to unrealistic expectations of an EU-U.S. relationship that still has its difficulties.
And that brings me back to the “Spidey meme.” When the TTC was first proposed, in the latter months of Donald Trump’s administration, it would have been unrealistic to suggest Brussels might willingly bend to Washington’s pressure on many issues now openly discussed in these twice-annual summits. Yet, if you consider the U.S.’s overtly anti-China stance, it’s fair to say the EU is more in that camp than at any time before. You can see it in the bloc’s recent economic security package that wouldn’t be out of place coming from the White House. You can see it in the EU’s Chips Act, a multibillion-euro plan to bring some microchip production back to Europe. You can see it in the telecom infrastructure spending in developing economies and the increasingly hawkish position on 6G standards. Not all those plans have come via the TTC. But it’s clear regular meetings with their American counterparts have rubbed off on European officials.
This isn’t a one-way street. Congress may be stuck in second gear, but the spate of digital policy announcements — from the White House and, I would argue, the U.S. Department of Justice (in its antitrust cases) and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (on its similar competition lawsuits and privacy commitments) — from that side of the Atlantic feel overtly European. My recent visit to Washington cemented this view. Gone are the days when U.S. officials would repeat industry talking points about no need for regulation and oversight. Sure, you get that in some agencies. But, overall, the discussion has shifted to what those rules should look like. And with that has come an EU-centric view of transparency, accountability and responsibility that seeps out of Washington’s renewed vision of digital policymaking. It’s hard not to see Brussels’ hand in some of that.
Before I get irate emails, not all of this is down to Washington embracing its “inner Brussels,” or vice versa. The European Commission, on its own, has become more hostile to China and now views digital policymaking through more of a national security lens. After years of missing the boat on tech regulation, the White House is belatedly getting into the game. Regular meetings — often between mid-ranking officials, many of whom have featured in “Wonk of the Week” — have done what the TTC was supposed to do: rekindle personal ties, create an opportunity to share ideas, and compete with a like-minded ally to shape good policy.
Will that continue after this year’s election cycle? There’s goodwill, on both sides, for it to do so, but everyone admits — candidly — that November’s election in the U.S. is such a game-changer that nothing is certain. As someone who, personally, encapsulates the transatlantic relationship, I’m optimistic. Not that the TTC will continue (my bet is that it won’t, at least not in its current form). But the policy osmosis these summits have instilled will stick around long after you stop reading about them in this newsletter. Like it or not, Brussels is more aligned with Washington’s national security-focused stance on digital. And, conversely, Washington is more willing to embrace Brussels-style rulemaking than ever before. If that’s the TTC’s legacy, so be it.
THE MULTIPLE FACES OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT
THIS JOB SOMETIMES LETS ME TIME TRAVEL. One day, I’m reading the U.S. Department of Justice-led lawsuit against Apple and its alleged anticompetitive behavior. That includes everything from undermining app developers and harming rival messaging services to crowding out cloud-based games. The next, I’m catching up with EU officials on their investigations into how Meta, Alphabet and Apple may have infringed the bloc’s new antitrust rules. Those probes focus equally — at least when it comes to Alphabet and Apple — on the tech giants potentially undermining app developers; limiting choice for consumers looking to swap to different services; and, for the search giant, potentially stacking the deck in favor of its own products. All of these companies deny any wrongdoing.
So why the time travel reference? For those of us with long memories of digital antitrust cases, what the Department of Justice announced sounds awfully similar to what the European Commission has doing over the last decade. By that, I mean focusing on how a small number of so-called gatekeeper companies have throttled innovation, hampered rivals and cut out consumer choice via a complex web of business decisions that favor their services over those of rivals. You can see it in Brussels’ three–part series of competition decisions against Google. While the search giant’s issues are somewhat different compared with those now facing Apple, the basic premise of the complaint is the same: A dominant smartphone software developer tilted the scales unfairly in its favor. For balance: Google is still appealing those decisions.
Those at the Department of Justice might reject claims that they’re reliving what the Commission already did. And, to be fair, the Apple case — which encompasses everything from smartwatches to messaging apps to financial services payments — is more expansive than anything that Brussels has so far thrown at the companies. But it does really feel like the U.S. is relitigating what the EU has already decided: that you can’t rely on the word of a small number of digital giants to uphold fair competition rules, especially when it involves a complex interplay of hardware, software and third-party developers in often proprietary commercial agreements. If the basic premise is that these companies may abuse their fairly acquired dominant position, then scolding them after the fact just isn’t going to cut it.
Hence why the Commission’s investigations — the first ones opened under the bloc’s Digital Markets Act — are a clear sign to those in the U.S. of what lies ahead. As part of the EU’s new antitrust regime, which will progressively come into force over the next two years, companies designated gatekeepers need to show how they allow others to compete fairly for potential customers — and, more importantly, revenue. That includes providing opt-outs for those seeking alternatives to, say, Apple’s App Store or Google Search. This is based on the belief — ever present in the Department of Justice’s lawsuit — that these companies are likely to lock in users to maximize profit and build barriers for rivals wherever they can.
As part of the new antitrust obligations, companies including Meta, ByteDance and Amazon have been forced to do things that would seem alien to people living outside the EU. Apple, for instance, made a series of changes to its businesses, including opening up its iOS software to rival app stores, allowing people to choose an alternative to its browser and reducing fees for third-party developers. Not everyone — most obviously Apple — is happy about these changes. But it’s a tacit recognition that the status quo — outlined, again, in the Department of Justice’s lawsuit — is not going to fly. For its part, the iPhone maker says these changes will harm users through increased privacy and security risks. Its opponents say Apple hasn’t gone far enough to open its digital walled garden to competition. You can never win.
The EU’s investigations, which will likely take most of a year and may lead to nothing, are the first test to determine whether the gatekeepers’ changes meet the bloc’s new standards. Those outside of Europe, especially in the U.S., may be wondering why EU consumers get more of a choice while they’re stuck with limited options and, for competitors, high fees. It’s a fair argument — one that is also playing out as Brussels enacts its separate online content-moderation rules, known as the Digital Services Act, which gives the bloc greater oversight over platforms in an all-important election year.
It’s true the EU and the U.S. legal systems are sufficiently different such that it’s unrealistic to port Europe’s new competition regime directly across the Atlantic. But at a time when U.S. authorities are aggressively pursuing competition cases against Big Tech (some, ahem, unsuccessfully), it’s a reminder there’s a lot to learn from those who have already trodden that path. Europe’s Digital Markets Act is the “ghost of Christmas future” for the U.S. when it comes to potentially stopping gatekeeping companies from abusing their positions, even before such harm takes place. Litigating the past — which, arguably, is what the Department of Justice is now doing, similar to what the Commission did with its Google’s cases — solves yesterday’s problems, today. Better to think about where future harm may come from and do what you can (albeit, clunkily) before that abuse ever occurs.
BY THE NUMBERS
WHAT ARE ALL THESE AI SAFETY INSTITUTES FOR?
JAPAN HAS ONE. SO DOES THE UNITED KINGDOM. The U.S.’s version is slowly coming together. The EU’s equivalent has a different name, but is about a month old. What am I talking about? The explosion of so-called AI Safety Institutes, quasi-government agencies in charge of mitigating some of the potential downsides of the most advanced forms of artificial intelligence.
This week, the U.S. signed separate collaboration agreementswith both the U.K. and the EU (the Washington-Brussels deal will be announced Friday) to coordinate how these institutes conduct their work. Japan hopes to pen similar relationships in the near future. The goal, according to those involved, is to maximize the impact of such work by sharing best practices with like-minded countries.
That all sounds great. But it’s also true that each country’s regulatory approach to AI governance is markedly different. Some, like the U.K., don’t have any AI legislation on the books. How people define “safety” also significantly differs depending on where you look. I’m not saying these international agreements aren’t worthwhile; it’s just easier to announce them than actually put them into practice.
WONK OF THE WEEK
GIVEN THAT THE BELGIANS WILL NOMINALLY host this week’s EU-U.S. Trade and Technology Council summit under their presidency of the Council of the European Union, we’re going for a two-parter this week.
Playing host-with-the-most will be Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo, a Flemish politician who worked at the Boston Consulting Group before turning his hand to politics 15 years ago — he’s served in multiple governments before taking the top job in 2020.
Alongside De Croo will be Hadja Lahbib, Belgium’s minister of foreign affairs, European affairs and foreign trade. Lahbib is a former journalist with expertise in the Middle East and Afghanistan, who took on her ministerial role in the summer of 2022.
THEY SAID WHAT, NOW?
China’s “Ministry of State Security and its state security departments focused on surreptitiously identifying and influencing the foreign policy of other countries, including the United States,” according to a U.S. indictment against a Chinese-government linked company and seven Chinese individuals for alleged efforts to conduct malicious cyber operations against critical networks in the U.S., the U.K. and other nations.
WHAT I’M READING
— A China-backed influence campaign, mostly on Facebook, has continued to endure despite Meta’s efforts to rid its platform of the inauthentic behavior, based on analysis from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.
— Sebastian Bay, a Swedish disinformation expert, used Google’s generative AI tools to analyze the company’s submissions detailing how it’s implementing the European Commission’s code of practice on disinformation. It did not do well.
— Katie Harbath, a former senior Meta executive, summarizes takeaways from the Aspen Institute’s recent conference on AI, disinformation and elections. It’s worth a read.
— OpenAI is testing new versions of AI-generated audio, in multiple languages, that will likely have both positive and negative consequences. Take a look at the company’s findings here.
— The Biden administration published a detailed memofrom its Office of Management and Budget explaining how the White House’s executive order on artificial intelligence will be implemented. Janet Haven, executive director of Data & Society, gives her view, while Pam Dixon, executive director of World Privacy Forum, has a more data protection-focused take.
— The growing trend toward so-called data localization worldwide will almost certainly harm human rights and limit the use of technology and the internet for good, according to a four-way discussion with civil society groups facilitated by Freedom House.
Apple e i dati personali. Un rapporto difficile
Degli studi dimostrano che le app di default raccolgono dati anche quando alcune funzioni dovrebbero essere disabilitate ed è molto difficile far si che questo effettivamente non accada
https://www.aalto.fi/en/news/keeping-your-data-from-apple-is-harder-than-expected
Keeping your data from Apple is harder than expected | Aalto University
New study shows that the default apps collect data even when supposedly disabled, and this is hard to switch offwww.aalto.fi
reshared this
Informa Pirata, Maurizio Paglia :verified:, Carlo Bencini e Baddo71 reshared this.
Far pagare gli utenti per effettuare le ricerche su Google con l'IA. Google pronta alla svolta?
Potrebbe includere la ricerca con le risposta generate dall'IA di Google in un piano a pagamento. Ma le pubblicità rimarrebbero
reshared this
Informa Pirata reshared this.
L’UE e gli Stati Uniti cercano di attirare i paesi in via di sviluppo in una partnership sulle materie prime critiche
L’UE e gli Stati Uniti stanno invitando i paesi in via di sviluppo a stringere una partnership che mira ad allineare le misure sulla fornitura di materie prime essenziali, ha affermato mercoledì (3 aprile) un funzionario della Commissione.
@news
EU and US look to attract developing countries into critical raw materials partnership
The EU and US are enticing developing countries into a partnership that looks to align measures on the supplyEliza Gkritsi (EURACTIV)
like this
Vanadio_Scaraf, dado e Rozaŭtuno like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata reshared this.
like this
Chris Trottier, Informa Pirata, Anban Govender e Tospif like this.
reshared this
william.maggos, stux⚡, ϻค𝔬ᑭ, ulaulaman, Überlebenskünstler (er/ihm), mastodon uno admin :mastodon:, :idle: OpenSoul :verified:, canard164, Informa Pirata, Sabrina Web :privacypride:, GhostOnTheHalfShell, Cory Doctorow, Anban Govender, Devol :fediverso:, ⭕UT :mastodon:, Sicurezza Digitale, Best Kevin :debian:, Andrea Bontempi, Bufale.net :verified:, Anacardo :unverified:, Lunga vita e prosperità., Tospif e Fabio reshared this.
Chris Trottier likes this.
@stux Honestly though I don't feel like it's much of a choice.
If I understand correctly, to interact with that account in any way is to allow Threads access to any and all data they can extract from me here, which... I'm here because I don't want to play that game any more.
It's a step in the right direction but I sure don't count it as a W.
I'm just here for cat pictures and rants about how much working in tech sucks.
If the apocalypse happens and I need to hear a speech from the POTUS, then there's a shortwave radio for that.
Anban Govender likes this.
If you did defederare why are you still commenting on too that talks about (@potus )? Honest question why the evangelization? If you are convinced and doing actions that reflect that why blasting around?
The majority of the people here on the #fediverse ran away from one person making all the decisions. I don’t know if you are aware of that. Not the admin of the biggest instance, nor you nor anyone “with concerns”.
You are free to voice whatever you want as you are doing but decisions like that won’t come from you nor any single person.
reshared this
SparkIT reshared this.
Oblomov reshared this.
I didn’t want to reply, it’s obvious that it is but conversation with users like artemesia are really boring…
nice
If the first part of your statement actually described a huge win, there wouldn't be any need for the White House to ever follow up on the second part.
This level of submissiveness to Threads is starting to look extremely pathetic.
Anban Govender likes this.
@kkeller That's easier said than done especially in a situation like Threads.
a) This can lead to more centralization if too many people have to migrate to a few instances willing to give them the ability to follow people on Threads.
b) Also, there's other advantages to use an instance close to my interest e.g Open Source and contribute to keep this smaller instances alive to avoid a)
So I don't think migrating is a great long term solution to the problem of who someone can follow.
@kkeller @dannycolin Also, if you're dissatisfied with the governance of your instance you can try to pick another one where the governance aligns with you.
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fediparty/wiki/Collectively-owned-instances
No, I can’t follow that account. I have to log in and create an account, says Threads. Eh… No thank you.
I am not sure I ever planned on following Biden anyway - BUT his team might need to know that you can help them. Otherwise they might just stay on Threads if it seems easier.
If the accounts that can see Bidens posts are limited to Treads, that means he could just have stayed on IG lol
I can't figure out how to follow him.
And when I try searching, I see multiple check-marked POTUS accounts, but none are the actual POTUS.
Anban Govender likes this.
Anban Govender reshared this.
Is it possible to have the @potus account mirrored to Mastodon so we don't have to remove our personal domain block on threads?
Not using Threads, Bluesky, or Twitter
I saw a pretty strong argument that given the current interpretations of the American 1st amendment, it would mean that if the US government hosted a mastodon server it would be illegal for the government to moderate who could post comments to it.
Most other western democratic freedom of speech laws aren't nearly as absolute and so their governments can block incitements to violence or obvious hate speech.
Nelfaneor reshared this.
Which, truly, I'd love to be able to do.
Unfortunately, @trumpet has elected to not federate with threads at all...even if I want to follow one account from there.
It's regrettable.
@dnanian As I understand it, those advocating a complete #Threads domain block take issue with the possibility that parent company #Meta may misuse *incoming* #fediverse content and metadata, not their *outgoing* traffic.
This is ironic because, apart from anonymized "likes,” Threads users who have opted in can’t receive federated messages yet.
@mjgardner @dnanian Your understanding is incorrect. Many of those who want to see Threads blocked at system level are concerned with Threads' moderation policies and the hateful and dangerous rhetoric they continue to allow.
To pick one example, Chaya Raichik (Libs of Tiktok) is on Threads.
After Libs of TikTok posted, at least 21 bomb threats followed
Libs of TikTok, run by Chaya Raichik, has gained immense popularity on X. As her follower-count has risen, bomb threats targeting her subjects followed.David Ingram (NBC News)
@mathew Cool, so rather than managing your own moderation so that sort of thing never darkens your feed, you’re agitating for everyone on the #fediverse to live under an indiscriminate ban-hammer.
And before you suggest folks like @dnanian move to another server with moderation they like, realize that you could do the same.
You just want others to do your work.
Governments active in the #fediverse with their own Mastodon servers:
- CH 🇨🇭: https://social.admin.ch
- DE 🇩🇪: https://social.bund.de
- EU 🇪🇺: https://social.network.europa.eu
- FR 🇫🇷: https://social.numerique.gouv.fr
- NL 🇳🇱: https://social.overheid.nl
Bundesrat - Conseil fédéral - Consiglio federale - Cussegl federal
Die Instanz der Schweizer Regierung. L' instance du gouvenement suisse. L' istanza del governo svizzero. L' istanza de la regenza svizra.Mastodon hosted on social.admin.ch
Anban Govender likes this.
reshared this
william.maggos, Fabio, bufalo1973🇺🇳⚛️, diggita, ϻค𝔬ᑭ, Jure Repinc :linux: :kde: e Anban Govender reshared this.
Yes, that's what I thought last night, that would be SUCH a win, terrific. It would be nice to have an official server for the Whitehouse, for instance, where all the government could have an account. Lovely, wonderful, all for it ❤
Why not mastodon.gov? I hope your team will work towards a broader solution that includes all branches of government as opposed to a narrow “White House” only focus.
Communicating directly with the people is important. And I hope this is just the beginning.
Um, do you have to allow replies to your Mastodon posts? I'm asking, because if you don't allow ANY replies to your posts, then you can't be guilty of viewpoint (or any other) discrimination. If no one is allowed to reply, then you haven't violated anyone's 1st amendment rights because they can still post whatever they'd like on their OWN account. In this way, POTUS could at least have the outlet, if not the interaction, through Mastodon.
Yes, we can follow (as we could with Twitter bots relaying Tweets to the fediverse).
But we can't see replies from threads (unless we happen to follow the person who is replying on threads). That may be a good thing, though.
And potus (and everyone else on Threads) can't see our replies.
So it's all a bit one-way (like the afforementioned bots).
Yeah I think over some time he will be here.
So, it's nice and it's a win, but i'd like to see them *on* Mastodon
@uriel @atomicpoet @mike There is a few already: https://stefanbohacek.com/blog/lessons-learned-from-running-a-single-person-mastodon-instance/#hosting
And US government is looking into setting up a Mastodon server, so hopefully there will be some news on that soon.
https://stefanbohacek.online/@stefan/112203552067257837
Fediverse: An overview for government agencies
It's not for everyone, but worth a try!Stefan Bohacek (stefanbohacek.com)
Mindboggling, given that this is already being worked on:https://stefanbohacek.online/@stefan/111978315030059050
Stefan Bohacek (@stefan@stefanbohacek.online)
"We believe there is an opportunity to help verify the online identities of American officials. Hosting a Mastodon server on .gov domains is one possibility.Stefan's Personal Mastodon Server
That is a great point and I believe you are correct from how I understand it as well.
I have followed POTUS in support but maybe I should unfollow. For the record, I am for #FediPact and against Threads being on here for reasons like you cite, and also because they're a proven poor moderator of hate groups and hate speech, and because they will undoubtedly Embrace, Extend, Extinguish, as I've seen happen on the internet over and over again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace%2C_extend%2C_and_extinguish
ironically, it's American law (namely the First Amendment) which disallows whitehouse.gov (for example) from running a mastodon (or other #fediverse) instance. They would probably be, by law, disallowed from moderating bad posts/accounts.
Other countries don't have this legal limitation, which is why so many other governments have their own #fedi instances.
But yeah, not federating with threads, hell no. It speaks volumes about their influence on US politics now, too.
Honestly, I don't think any institutions should run their accounts on somebody else's instances.
@potus@us.gov along with all of Congress and other federal government reps on it that doesn't then have to share any of Facebook's deservedly bad reputation.
Same for states or companies, they should run their own instances for complete ownership of their content and distribution.
Agreed (that it's nice and also that a gov instance would be even better).
Another (minor) benefit of a gov Mastodon instance is that the POTUS account there could have a join date that's not April 1st...
So yes this high horses morally exceptional keyboard warriors have the same flaws as ever and any human.
Given the recent court rulings that elected officials in the United States can't block constituents on social media if they're posting in an official capacity, I'm not sure it would be feasible for the US government to run a fediverse instance. They might be required to leave it essentially unmoderated except for content that is outright illegal.
Did you heard about fedipact ? (It's a rhetorical question)
"i am an instance admin/mod on the fediverse. by signing this pact, i hereby agree to block any instances owned by meta should they pop up on the fediverse. project92 is a real and serious threat to the health and longevity of fedi and must be fought back against at every possible opportunity"
https://fedipact.online/
https://fedipact.veganism.social/
#Fedipact - The instances blocking Zuckerberg's Threads.net
An interactive list to see which ActivityPub (Matodon, Lemmy, FireFish, etc) instances are federating with Threads.netfedipact.veganism.social
@potus@threads.net
Yeah you love standing in front of fascists don't you?
Never met a genocider you didn't like did you?
When this experiment has faded because of your thirsty need to be at the big table, let's just hope there is something better rather than you just being The next in a long line of sellouts
not only should the White House have its own Instance but they should have handcrafted emojis of all of the presidents… Made in MURICA
Ronald Reagan wearing sunglasses with the quote “well”
Andy Card whispering to Dubya
Clinton sitting at a desk with a huge smile
🇺🇸
President Joe Biden (@potus) on Threads
46th President of the United States, husband to @flotus, proud dad and pop. Finishing the job for all Americans. Text me: (302) 404-0880. 2.7M Followers.Threads
Your instance mas.to is blocking threads.net https://fba.ryona.agency/?reverse=mas.to
@Eugen Rochko
The EU runs a Mastodon for information sharing, since the fediverse really does make a lot of of sense for governments and similarly sized/shaped organizations - https://social.network.europa.eu/
They even have a peertube for video communications as well - https://tube.network.europa.eu/
EU Voice
EU Voice is the official ActivityPub platform of the EU institutions. With EU Video, it is part of an alternative social media pilot proposed and provided by the European Data Protection Supervisor.Mastodon hosted on social.network.europa.eu
Volevo aggiungere un attimo una cosa...
La gaffe del ministro Sangiuliano: "Se pensiamo a Londra, pensiamo a Times Square..." | LA7
La gaffe del ministro della cultura Gennaro Sangiuliano su Londra e Times Square.La7.it
reshared this
Informa Pirata, Alemonac e Baddo71 reshared this.
Julian Assange: “Questa generazione è l’ultima generazione libera" - Articolo e video del 21/9/2018
Il fondatore di #Wikileaks ha affermato che a anno dalla nascita, i bambini sono già noti alle "principali potenze mondiali" perché "genitori idioti" pubblicano i loro nomi e le loro foto su #Facebook. Assange prevede anche una futura cyberwar globale poiché Internet non ha distanze né confini e gli hacker possono attaccare chiunque in qualsiasi parte del pianeta
Julian Assange warns this generation is the last to be free of surveillance
The Wikileaks founder said that within a year of being born, children are now known to 'all major world powers' because their 'idiotic parents' post their names and pictures on Facebook.Sara Malm (Daily Mail)
like this
m90, Vanadio_Scaraf e UprisingVoltage like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, Thomas Blechschmidt, Gianmarco Gargiulo :tux: :kde:, Gazzetta del Cadavere, StatusSquatter :squat: 🍫 e diggita reshared this.
Mro likes this.
reshared this
informapirata :privacypride: reshared this.
il problema si risolve non facendo più figli, in 90 anni abbiamo risolto tutti i problemi del mondo. Poi danno solo preoccupazioni i figli.
p.s.
non è assolutamente un'idea presa da Attack on titan
Europol report: Insistence on data retention contradicts the threats presented
Avviso contenuto: Europol has published its Internet Organised Crime Assessment (IOCTA) (PDF). The report assesses the cybercrime landscape and describes how threads have changed over the last two years. Patrick Breyer … https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/fi
Europol has published its Internet Organised Crime Assessment (IOCTA) (PDF). The report assesses the cybercrime landscape and describes how threads have changed over the last two years.
Patrick Breyer MEP (German Pirate Party / Greens/EFA) and digital freedom fighter, comments:
“Europol’s support for indiscriminate data retention does not reflect the facts. The agency’s report identifies real threats that can’t be addressed with data retention or any other means of blanket mass surveillance of all citizen’s communication data. It is time for Europol and the European Union in general to refocus on targeted investigations and strenghening civil society.”
Europol’s role in the “Going Dark” program (#EUGoingDark)
In the report the European Union’s law enforcement agency focuses on cybercrime-as-a-service, underground communities, criminal markets for stolen credentials and victim data as well as on fraud strategies.
As member of the High-Level Expert Group on access to data for effective law enforcement which is also know as the “Going Dark” program Europol is tasked to “contribute to integrating a law enforcement perspective, including privacy and data protection requirements, in all relevant EU policies and actions (‘security by design’)” and to “explore how security by design could be a standard requirement in the development of new technologies.” Most pressing “challenges” identified are: Encryption (access, en clair, to stored content and digital communication data), data retention of localisation data and roaming data, as well as anonymisation, including VPN and Darknets. (Council document 8281/23 https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-8281-2023-INIT/en/pdfPDF)
Europol is a strong proponent of reintroducing provisions on the indiscriminate retention of citizen’s communications metadata such as IP addresses. In 2018 the agency was unsuccessful with a “Data Retention Matrix” – a proposal to introduce data retention in the European Union. (WK 3005/2018 INIT PDF)
Organised criminals can circumvent data retention – most law-abiding citizens cannot
According to the Internet Organised Crime Assessment Europol observes “a high level of specialisation inside criminal networks” and the agency faces the development that “[o]ffenders (…) mask their actions and identities as their knowledge of countermeasures increases.”
Patrick Breyer MEP comments:
“Europol’s report confirms the fact that blanket data retention is unsuitable for fighting organised crime because it can easily be circumvented, for example by using anonymisation services. What is needed instead of bulk storage of citizen’s communications meta data are fast, well equipped and targeted investigations.”
The role of Internet Service Providers
In the report, Europol presents Internet Service Providers as service providers for crimes: “Many Internet Service Providers (ISPs) frequently used by criminals do not engage in extensive customer monitoring practices such as Know-Your-Customer (KYC) procedures and storing of customer and metadata (e.g. IP address)”
Patrick Breyer MEP comments:
“Europol places Internet Service Providers under general suspicion and seems to expect them to violate privacy legislation. We have a right to use the Internet anonymously! Targeting ISP’s privacy policies is like generally blaming landlords for domestic violence.
The task and duty of Internet Service Providers in democracies is to enable citizens to communicate securely and confidentially.”
Child grooming
The report finds that “[c]hild sexual exploitation offenders make extensive use of social media to engage with their victims, interacting with them often behind a false identity. (…) Child sexual exploitation offenders groom victims in order to obtain sensitive information that can be then exploited for extortion purposes.”
Patrick Breyer MEP comments:
“In fact Europol’s report rightly underlines the need for better education and training of (potential) victims, especially children and teenagers. Instead of data retention and other means of mass surveillance, we need more competent and better equipped social workers, training young people on perpetrator strategies and how to defeat them, anonymous online counselling, awareness programs, privacy-friendly design of social media platforms and other measures that actually address the
problem.”
Prevent data theft
Addressing the economics of cybercrime Europol finds that “the central commodity of this illicit economy is stolen data”.
Patrick Breyer MEP comments:
“Europol’s report underlines the importance of privacy, anonymity and encryption to protect citizens from identity theft and other crimes. Bulk retention of personal data provokes hacks and leaks. Only data that is not being stored is secure data.”
Tigray, la minoranza etnica di Irob è ancora sotto occupazione eritrea
Avviso contenuto: In Tigray, stato regionale del’ Etiopia settentrionale, ai confini con l’Eritrea, tra il novembre 2020 e il novembre 2022 si è combattuto una guerra genocida in cui le stime parlano di 800.000 persone di origini tigrine uccise, 120.000 donne di ogni età e
In Tigray, stato regionale del’ Etiopia settentrionale, ai confini con l’Eritrea, tra il novembre 2020 e il novembre 2022 si è combattuto una guerra genocida in cui le stime parlano di 800.000 persone di origini tigrine uccise, 120.000 donne di ogni età e ceto sociale stuprate come arma di guerra, distruzione e saccheggi. Nel novembre 2022 viene firmato l’accordo di cessazione ostilità a Pretoria tra governo etiope e membri del TPLF – Tigray People’s Liberation Front.
Un video scioccante (segue traduzione testuale in italiano) proveniente dal distretto #Irob violentemente occupato, Zona Orientale del Tigray , conferma solo ciò che già sappiamo: il regime eritreo sta imponendo una falsa identità eritrea agli residenti della minoranza etnica di Irob con la negazione degli aiuti e dei servizi essenziali e minacciando costrizione al servizio militare nazionale obbligatorio in Eritrea (noto come programma di schiavitù a tempo indeterminato) poiché territori annessi con la forza all’Eritrea. Il video è stato girato in una località chiamata Alakalo, presso Masi-Dage (scuola media) ad Adgadi-Are/Edalgeda (sottodistretto settentrionale di Irob).
https://www.youtube.com/embed/NFYyUh-wCu4?feature=oembed
Ecco la traduzione del video in tigrino:
“Come eritrei, anche voi dovete sostenere la lotta degli eritrei e del governo eritreo. Siamo tutti eritrei; non c’è distinzione tra te e noi.Tutti gli eritrei devono sapere che il governo eritreo è stato costretto ad affrontare la lotta e la sofferenza che sta affrontando; non aveva alcun desiderio di prendervi parte.
Weyane (TPLF – Tigray People’s Liberation Front) è un agente; non ha la forza di sfidare il governo eritreo. Sia nel passato (guerra etio-eritrea 1998/2000) che nel presente, sta eseguendo gli ordini di altre forze che lo sostengono.
La lotta del popolo e del governo dell’Eritrea è anche la vostra lotta. Dovresti esserne orgoglioso. Dovresti capire che il governo eritreo sta vincendo sopportando tutte le sanzioni e le sfide non contro il TPLF ma contro il mondo.
Dovresti esserne orgoglioso se sei eritreo.
Un uomo anziano ha detto: “Noi (il popolo di Irob) ci siamo abituati alla democrazia illimitata sotto la guida del TPLF. Ora ci stai dicendo che siamo sotto la tua amministrazione. Ma non sarai in grado di tollerare i nostri modi”.
Questo discorso è ciò che continua ad essere propagato. Quando camminiamo su questa terra di martiri, la camminiamo dolcemente. Ma ciò che sta arrivando da questo lato (TPLF) è davvero spregevole. Siete persone. Ma questo è territorio eritreo. Se siete eritrei dovete difendervi da ciò che arriva dall’altra parte e collaborare con l’esercito eritreo.Ciò che viene riferito è che non c’è nessuno dell’Irob che fornisca informazioni o collabori con l’esercito eritreo. Lo indagheremo.
Inoltre si dice che gli Irob, pur considerandosi eritrei, hanno dei disaccordi con il governo eritreo per quanto riguarda gli aiuti umanitari e il servizio nazionale. Ma se siete eritrei, che vi piaccia o no, dovrete affrontare le cose che ogni eritreo sperimenta.
Durante la lotta armata, i combattenti che si sono uniti alla lotta eritrea da Irob hanno compiuto il loro dovere nazionale e sono stati martirizzati. Sebbene, durante la guerra, la terra (di Irob) possa, in momenti diversi, essere passata di mano tra l’Eritrea e il TPLF, voi sapete che i vostri figli e fratelli hanno pagato sacrifici per l’Eritrea durante la lotta armata.
Se c’è qualcuno che crede di essere etiope, il governo eritreo non costringerà nessuno a rimanere qui. Ma questo territorio appartiene all’Eritrea. E gli eritrei risiedono sul territorio eritreo. E gli eritrei devono rispettare il dominio eritreo come gli altri popoli (eritrei). Se c’è la carestia, dovresti morire di fame come tutti gli altri. Se arrivano alcuni chicchi, li dividi con loro e vivi così. Non ci sarà alcuna preferenza.
Per quanto riguarda la sicurezza in particolare, ha prevalso l’illegalità. Vengono da Adigrat e qui trascorrono la notte; partono da qui e trascorrono la notte a Senafe. E tu non ci riferisci questo. A meno che tu non fornisca informazioni, il servizio sociale che hai richiesto non verrà fornito. Se difendete la vostra Patria (Eritrea) e il vostro territorio, vi sarà fornito un servizio sociale adeguato perché potrà continuare a preservare la sua pace. Se non collabori, però, le tue richieste non verranno soddisfatte. Quindi, chi soffrirà? Sei tu che soffrirai.
Ognuno deve mettere in sicurezza il proprio territorio. Se assistono a un movimento inappropriato (devi segnalarlo). Operatori sanitari e soldati, che non sono originari di questa zona, sono di stanza qui per 24 ore lasciando dietro di sé la famiglia e il matrimonio. Questo per soddisfare le vostre esigenze di salute e sicurezza.
Sono i nativi che conoscono i punti attraverso i quali i nemici potrebbero intrufolarsi. Anche se un’intera brigata dovesse essere schierata qui, senza la vostra collaborazione, non sarebbe possibile portare a termine il lavoro.
Anche se tuo fratello dovesse venire da Adigrat, qualunque sia lo scopo della sua visita, devi segnalarlo all’organismo competente. Non verrà giustiziato o ferito. Verrà indagato e trattato solo in conformità con lo scopo della visita.Se vai ad Adigrat per ricevere aiuti e fornire informazioni riservate ma ritorni qui e quando ti viene richiesto di fornire informazioni su ciò che hai visto lì, dici di non aver visto nulla, la tua [non udibile/fedeltà?] è con il TPLF.
Non c’è differenza tra te e noi. Siete eritrei. Vi trattiamo come gli eritrei ad Adi-Kuala e Senafe, soprattutto da quando è stata istituita l’amministrazione. Ma bisogna rispettare le regole del Paese”
NOTA: Alakalo è lo stesso luogo in cui nell’aprile 2017 la fondazione italiana Butterfly aveva finanziato ed inaugurato un pozzo per l’acqua per la comunità locale di Irob.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/qRPuvh6uutQ?feature=oembed
FONTE: https://twitter.com/IrobAnina/status/1775011045377278356
Grave violazione della sicurezza colpisce un’agenzia di polizia dell’UE
La scomparsa di file sensibili di alti funzionari delle forze dell'ordine ha scatenato una crisi all'Europol
Serious security breach hits EU police agency
Disappearance of sensitive files of top law enforcement officials has sparked a crisis at Europol.Antoaneta Roussi (POLITICO)
like this
andscape, mapto e Vanadio_Scaraf like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata, Thomas Blechschmidt e Gazzetta del Cadavere reshared this.
Comunicazione di servizio: in questi giorni ho qualche difficoltà ad aggiornare con continuità gli account mastodon di @informapirata e di @pirati
Fino a domani, la maggior parte degli aggiornamenti verrà trasmessa sul canale telegram https://t.me/ppInforma
Informa Pirata: informazione e notizie
Politica Pirata: informazione su #whistleblowing #dirittidigitali #sovranitàdigitale #copyright #privacy #cyberwarfare #pirati #Europa #opensource #opendata https://www.informapirata.itTelegram
Informa Pirata reshared this.
Full chat control proposal leaked: attack on digital privacy of correspondence and secure encryption
Avviso contenuto: The French news service contexte.com has today published the latest Belgian Presidency’s proposal for introducing indiscriminate chat control scanning of private messages for illegal content. The proposal covers the entire … https://www.patrick-breyer.de
The French news service contexte.com has today published the latest Belgian Presidency’s proposal for introducing indiscriminate chat control scanning of private messages for illegal content. The proposal covers the entire regulation and is therefore ready for endorsement. The proposal is to be discussed tomorrow in a Council law enforcement working party. The political points of contention will then be decided in COREPER in order to adopt the position by June.
The leaked proposal shows that the core of the EU Commission’s extreme initial proposal is to be retained unchanged, warns MEP and most prominent opponent of chat control Patrick Breyer (Pirate Party):
“As the Council’s legal service has confirmed, the latest move does not change the nature of detection orders. Millions of private chats and private photos of law-abiding citizens are to be searched and leaked using flawed technology, without them being even remotely connected to child sexual abuse – this destroys our digital privacy of correspondence. Despite lip service being paid to encryption, client-side scanning is to be used to undermine previously secure end-to-end encryption in order to turn our smartphones into spies – this destroys secure encryption.
Now is the time to take to the barricades in favour of privacy and secure encryption, because EU governments that have been critical so far are praising the repackaged plans, which means that the blocking minority no longer stands. Not even a written opinion of the Council’s legal service on this obvious violation of fundamental rights has been requested, it seems.
If the EU governments actually go into trilogue negotiations with this radical position, experience shows that the Parliament risks gradually abandoning its initial position behind closed doors and agreeing to bad and dangerous compromises that fundamentally put our online security at risk.”
In detail Breyer criticises the proposed text as follows: „Limiting bulk chat searches to ‘high-risk services’ is meaningless because every communication service is misused also for sharing illegal images and therefore has an imminently high risk of abuse. Ireland – one of the strongest proponents of chat control – would be classifying the major services. In any case, the service used is no justification for searching the private chats of millions of citizens who are not even remotely connected to any wrongdoing.
Informing law enforcement only of repeat hits is also meaningless, as falsely flagged beach pictures or consensual sexting rarely involve just a single photo. The EU Commissioner for Home Affairs has herself herself stated that three out of four of the disclosed chats and photos are not actionable for the police. These algorithms and hash databases are totally unreliable in distinguishing legal from illegal content.”
Breyer’s information portal and document archive on the proposal: chatcontrol.eu
Alberto reshared this.
Il grande ricablaggio: i social media sono davvero dietro un’epidemia di malattie mentali adolescenziali?
Le prove sono dubbie sul fatto che il tempo passato davanti allo schermo sia responsabile dell’aumento dei livelli di depressione e ansia adolescenziale – e la crescente isteria potrebbe distrarci dall’affrontare le vere cause.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00902-2
The great rewiring: is social media really behind an epidemic of teenage mental illness?
The evidence is equivocal on whether screen time is to blame for rising levels of teen depression and anxiety — and rising hysteria could distract us from tackling the real causes.Odgers, Candice L.
like this
Dieguito 🦝, essell, Vanadio_Scaraf e H4mi like this.
sulgoth doesn't like this.
reshared this
Informa Pirata e RFanciola reshared this.
Due cose vanno dette dopo aver letto The Anxious Generation: venderà molte copie, perché Jonathan Haidt racconta una storia spaventosa sullo sviluppo dei bambini e i genitori ci vogliono credere; inoltre il ricablaggio del cervello dei nostri figli non è supportato dalla scienza. Quel che è peggio, l’audace proposta che la colpa sia dei social media potrebbe distrarci dal rispondere efficacemente alle vere cause dell’attuale crisi di salute mentale dei giovani.
Vanadio_Scaraf likes this.
reshared this
Alfonso :verified: e RFanciola reshared this.
Insomma, abbiamo una generazione in crisi e che ha un disperato bisogno del meglio di ciò che la scienza e le soluzioni basate sull’evidenza possono offrire. Sfortunatamente, il nostro tempo viene speso riempito raccontando storie che non sono supportate dalla ricerca e che fanno poco per sostenere i giovani che hanno bisogno e meritano di più.
Vanadio_Scaraf likes this.
reshared this
informapirata :privacypride: reshared this.
@mchisari ti ringrazio per il riscontro interessante.
Certamente i libri che leggiamo presentano un sostrato sottointeso che non sempre possiamo condividere, apprezzare o anche semplicemente cogliere, dal momento che vengono scritti per utenti e cittadini che appartengono a contesti diversi.
Eppure, come hai confermato anche tu, quando un libro è scritto bene non importa che sia esatto ma apre la mente su concetti e scenari sui quali difficilmente ci saremmo Affacciati
reshared this
informapirata :privacypride: reshared this.
@Gert beh però non è così... La domanda nel titolo non nasce mica per generazione spontanea, ma segue alla pubblicazione di The Anxious Generation, che propugna esattamente quella tesi, libro di cui questo articolo è una recensione...
Giustamente la recensione mette in dubbio la tesi di fondo e contestualizza il disagio giovanile in uno scenario più complesso
reshared this
informapirata :privacypride: reshared this.
Heliumfart
in reply to ulaulaman • • •like this
finitely_prolonged e TIMMAY like this.
ailiphilia
in reply to Heliumfart • • •ulaulaman
in reply to ailiphilia • • •like this
TIMMAY e ailiphilia like this.
TIMMAY doesn't like this.
Heliumfart
in reply to ulaulaman • • •ailiphilia likes this.
ulaulaman
in reply to Heliumfart • • •ailiphilia doesn't like this.
Heliumfart
in reply to ulaulaman • • •