Salta al contenuto principale



What the Maduro ‘extradition’ could mean for U.S. journalists


For journalists who work online, the most dangerous assumption is that press freedom is territorial. It is not. In the digital age, journalists publish globally by default, and states increasingly assert criminal jurisdiction globally as well.

The recent assertion of U.S. authority to seize (kidnapping is such an “ugly” word) Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro illustrates a broader and deeply unsettling truth: Once a state claims jurisdiction, the limiting factor is not law, but power. For journalists, that reality has been quietly unfolding for decades.

Extraterritorial jurisdiction and the press


Domestic law (and law enforcement) does not stop at the border. Most countries reserve the “right” to prosecute those outside the country whose actions are directed inside the country, or which impact that country’s laws, citizens, or property.

The concept of “extraterritorial” jurisdiction of domestic law was recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1922 in United States v. Bowman, where the court noted that certain criminal statutes apply extraterritorially by their nature when they protect national interests. This is commonly called the “protective” principle of extraterritorial application of law. In the cyber era, courts have applied this doctrine aggressively to online conduct, including speech, publication, and data access.

Journalists are not exempt. While the First Amendment provides robust protection against U.S. prosecution for publishing truthful information of public concern, those protections are not portable. They do not bind foreign courts, nor do they prevent foreign states from asserting jurisdiction over content accessible within their borders.

Journalists prosecuted for online speech abroad


One of the earliest and most influential cases illustrating this problem is LICRA v. Yahoo! Inc., a 2000 French case where the court asserted jurisdiction over Yahoo, a U.S. company, for hosting Nazi memorabilia auctions accessible from France, where French law prohibited the display of Nazi materials.

Although Yahoo ultimately resisted enforcement in U.S. courts, the case established the principle that online publication can subject speakers and publishers to the criminal law of any country where the content is accessible. Countries routinely attempt to enforce their own laws — terrorism, defamation, etc., over the activities of journalists outside their borders.

For example, in Akçam v. Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights recognized the chilling effect of Turkey’s criminal laws on speech, including academic and journalistic commentary. But Turkish prosecutors continue to attempt to use Interpol red notices — which alert law enforcement agencies worldwide to locate and detain an individual — to have foreign journalists prosecuted.

In 2023, Russian authorities issued criminal charges against foreign reporters for coverage of the war in Ukraine, alleging dissemination of “false information” about the Russian military — conduct that would be core protected speech in the United States — in violation of the Russian criminal code.

If other countries adopt the Maduro precedent, a foreign country can enforce its laws against U.S. journalists simply by force or power.

China has attempted to use Article 12 of the Cybersecurity Law of the PRC to prosecute those who disseminate online content that “endangers national security” or “damages the public interest” of China. Foreign journalists have been detained, expelled, or prosecuted for online reporting hosted on servers outside China but accessible within it. The Maduro regime itself cracked down on journalists within its own borders, prosecuting them for crimes like terrorism, incitement, and conspiracy.

The United States recently proposed to require those entering the country to provide border agents with access to five years of their social media history, threatening to use this information to ban, arrest, detain, or punish those whose history indicates some vaguely defined “un-American” political persuasion. Moreover, the U.S. government spent years attempting to obtain jurisdiction over Australian WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for his publication from abroad of materials the U.S. government claimed could not be published under U.S. law.

There is no ‘there there’


Typically, if speech is permitted (or protected) in the jurisdiction in which it is uttered or published, but prohibited or regulated in another country, the “injured” country has few remedies to go after the speaker/publisher. While it can charge the person with a crime and request that they be extradited, extradition treaties typically require that the conduct be considered “criminal” in both countries. And many countries (including the U.S.) do not typically extradite their own citizens.

Add to that the fact that most extradition treaties also permit the host country to resist extradition for “political speech” or “political activity,” and that an extradition request is subject to both a legal and political process. In addition, the likelihood that a U.S. journalist would be extradited to China, Turkey, or another country for First Amendment-protected activity is small — not nonexistent, but small.

Countries may, however, consider the activities of journalists to constitute violations of surveillance, theft, intellectual property, threat, defamation, or espionage laws, increasing the chance that they will be treated as nonpolitical offenses. Put simply, we extradite whom we want to countries we want for purposes we want. And that’s what other countries do as well.

Kidnapping, rendition, and the Ker–Frisbie Doctrine


What the Maduro case shows is that governments (including the U.S. government) reserve either the right or the pure ability to invade the territorial sovereignty of other nations to obtain jurisdiction over those (including heads of state) we believe have violated U.S. law. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed the authority of the U.S. to “kidnap” persons overseas and bring them to U.S. courts — and presumably the opposite applies as well.

Under what is called the Ker-Frisbie Doctrine, the domestic courts do not look at the way the court obtained jurisdiction over the defendant (unless this “shocks the conscience”), but simply look at whether the defendant is physically present.

In the 1886 case Ker v. Illinois, the Supreme Court held that a defendant abducted from Peru could still be tried in U.S. court. It affirmed the principle in 1952 in Frisbie v. Collins. In the 1992 case United States v. Alvarez-Machain, after U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration agents abducted a doctor in Mexico and brought him to trial in the U.S., the court noted that the U.S./Mexico extradition treaty was just “one way” to obtain jurisdiction over a person. Apparently, kidnapping is another. As a federal appellate court made clear five years later in United States v. Noriega, this principle applies to foreign heads of state as well.

What this means for journalists


For journalists, the implication is sobering. Publishing an article, hosting leaked documents, or reporting on state misconduct online can expose a reporter to criminal liability in jurisdictions with radically different views of press freedom.

The fact that the work is lawful — and even celebrated — in the United States offers no protection abroad. We saw that when Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi was abducted and dismembered by the Saudi government at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, Turkey.

What typically “saves” journalists is that foreign countries may fear invading the territorial sovereignty of the host nation. This is why most prosecutions of journalists occur in the country in which they are operating. Russia’s prosecutions of Alsu Kurmasheva, a Russian-American journalist working for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, and Wall Street Journal correspondent Evan Gershkovich follow this pattern, as does the Turkish government’s detention of freelance journalist Lindsey Snell in Turkey in 2016.

In a networked world, journalism is inherently transnational, but press freedom is not.

However, if a journalist can be lured into a compliant country, or if other countries adopt the Maduro precedent, a foreign country can enforce its laws on people in the U.S. simply by force or power. Instructive is the case of Henry Liu, a Chinese American critic of the Taiwanese government, which hired Taiwanese gang members to kill him in California, or the attempted murder in Brooklyn, New York, of Iranian-American journalist Masih Alinejad.

While journalists and others may be protected by the First Amendment, that protection typically applies only if they are physically in the United States, and assumes that the U.S. has no interest in extraditing the journalist to another country. With the Maduro precedent extending the authority to kidnap those who we perceive to have violated the law of one nation, other nations can be expected to follow suit. It’s no longer about what White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller called “international niceties” but is about “a world, … the real world, … that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power.”

Law as narrative, power as reality


The lesson for journalists is not that the law is meaningless, but that it is secondary. Power determines who is charged, who is seized, and who is left alone. Law supplies justification after the fact.

In a networked world, journalism is inherently transnational, but press freedom is not. For journalists who work online, the question is no longer merely, “Is this lawful where I am?” It is, “Who might claim jurisdiction, and what can they do to enforce it?”

The answer, increasingly, depends less on courts than on geopolitics.

In cyberspace, publication is global. So is exposure.


freedom.press/issues/what-the-…



Identifying government officials is not ‘doxxing’


Dear Friend of Press Freedom,

Welcome to 2026. Rümeysa Öztürk has now been facing deportation for 290 days for co-writing an op-ed the government didn’t like, and journalist Ya’akub Vijandre remains locked up by Immigration and Customs Enforcement over social media posts about issues he reported on. Read on for more on the year’s turbulent start for press freedom.

House committee votes to subpoena journalist for Venezuela reporting


A motion introduced Jan. 7 by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., to subpoena journalist Seth Harp passed the House Oversight Committee in a bipartisan voice vote. Luna accused Harp of “leaking classified intel about Operation Absolute Resolve, including doxxing a Delta Force commander.”

The next day, Luna wrote a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi calling for a criminal investigation of Harp. The journalist, however, merely reported the name and publicly available online biography of the commander involved in the abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro.

In a statement we issued with Defending Rights & Dissent and the First Amendment Foundation following the subpoena, Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) Chief of Advocacy Seth Stern explained that, “Identifying government officials by name is not doxxing or harassment, no matter how many times Trump allies say otherwise.” Everyone who supported Luna’s motion — including Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia, the ranking member of the oversight committee — should be ashamed.


John Cusack wants to talk about paywalls


Actor and activist John Cusack, a founding board member of FPF, spoke to Columbia Journalism Review about why more news outlets need to remove paywalls for reporting based on Freedom of Information Act requests.

“There’s an irony in the fact that FOIA-based reporting often ends up behind a paywall, because the public owns government records. We fund their creation through taxes, and we fund the agencies that produce them. We fund the FOIA office that processes the disclosure request—the entire apparatus is built on the premise that this information belongs to us,” Cusack said.

He’s not just making a moral case, though. As Cusack notes, outlets like Wired and 404 Media have seen subscriptions surge after unpaywalling their public records reporting.


The document giving ICE 80 million Medicaid patients’ data


Last year, FPF and 404 Media sued the Department of Homeland Security for a copy of a data-sharing agreement enabling Immigration and Customs Enforcement to receive personal data of Medicaid patients after the agency failed to turn it over in response to FOIA requests. A U.S. attorney working on that case then flagged that the document had quietly been released in a separate lawsuit.

At the end of December, a judge ruled that the Trump administration could resume sharing much of the data after it had been blocked from doing so, Politico reported. That means ICE can use Medicaid data in deportation cases starting Jan. 6, Politico added.


Don’t forget who really sold out CBS News


It’s easy to understand why the outrage over CBS News’ recent self-censorship and propaganda — from spiking stories to airing segments “saluting” the politicians it’s supposed to scrutinize — has largely been directed at CBS News Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss and her boss, Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison.

But, as Stern wrote for The Contrarian, let’s not forget who first sold out CBS News: former Paramount Chair Shari Redstone.


Transparency did not delay justice for Kelly or Epstein. Prosecutors did


One of the prosecutors who helped put sexual predator and R&B star R. Kelly behind bars wrote that releasing the Jeffrey Epstein documents without extensive redactions would hinder future prosecutions. Transparency, argued Elizabeth Geddes, would interfere with investigators gaming out 3D chess moves to build airtight cases against Epstein’s associates.

Most Americans, however, don’t share her confidence in the system that packs private prisons with small-time offenders while the Epsteins and Kellys of the world walk free for decades. In fact, there’s an excellent chance both of them would still be preying on young girls from Chicago to the U.S. Virgin Islands if not for the transparency forced by dogged journalism.

Stern and Jim DeRogatis, the reporter who broke the R. Kelly story, wrote about how misguided Geddes’ take and others like it are.


What we're reading


A rough year for journalists in 2025, with a little hope for things to turn around

The Associated Press
The year 2025 was a dangerous one for journalists in the U.S., reports the AP, citing our U.S. Press Freedom Tracker. There were at least 170 assaults on journalists last year, 94% of them at the hands of law enforcement.


2025 left a stressed-out First Amendment

Free Speech Center
“By any measure, 2025 was a stressful year for those who worry about the First Amendment and its status as the bedrock of American liberty.”


The battle for press freedom in the streets

Columbia Journalism Review
Journalists who experience press freedom abuses should speak out and document the incidents on social media, in their publications, and via the Tracker, FPF Deputy Director of Advocacy Adam Rose told CJR.


Filming ICE agents is a First Amendment right. So why might it land you in jail?

Straight Arrow News
“There’s a reason DHS and its counterparts keep getting humiliated in court when they pretend to be victims,” Rose told Straight Arrow News. “They’re losing in front of juries, judges are calling them not credible.”


freedom.press/issues/identifyi…


404 Media and Freedom of the Press Foundation Sue DHS


Last week Freedom of the Press Foundation and 404 Media filed a lawsuit against the multiple parts of the U.S. government demanding they hand over a copy of an agreement that shares the personal data of nearly 80 million Medicaid patients with ICE. The data sharing marked a watershed moment for ICE and its access to highly sensitive data that is ordinarily siloed off from the agency. We believe it’s important for the public to see this unprecedented data sharing agreement for themselves.

As the Associated Press wrote when it first reported on the data sharing agreement between the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the agreement will give ICE the ability to find “the location of aliens.” The data shared includes home addresses and ethnicities, according to the Associated Press.

💡
Do you know anything else about this data sharing agreement? I would love to hear from you. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at joseph.404 or send me an email at joseph@404media.co.

Both Freedom of the Press Foundation and 404 Media filed similar Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests with DHS and CMS seeking a copy of the agreement. Neither agency provided the requested records in time, so we have now filed the lawsuit. In 404 Media’s case, CMS acknowledged the request but has not provided the records, and DHS did not even acknowledge the request at all.

404 Media’s request asked for a copy of the specific agreement, and if the agencies were unable to locate it, to alternatively provide copies of all agreements between DHS and CMS from this year.

“Despite having received the FOIA requests, and despite their obligations under the law, Defendants have failed to notify Plaintiffs of the scope of documents that they will produce or the scope of documents that they plan to withhold in response to the FOIA requests,” the lawsuit reads.
playlist.megaphone.fm?p=TBIEA2…
Freedom of the Press Foundation is a non-profit organization that monitors press freedom issues in the U.S. and trains journalists on how to keep themselves and their sources safe. It regularly sues the U.S. government for access to records.

The data sharing agreement is just one of a growing list of ways that ICE is sourcing highly sensitive, and sometimes legally protected, information as part of the Trump administration’s mass deportation effort. ProPublica reported on the vast system the IRS is building to share millions of taxpayers’ data with ICE. 404 Media previously reported ICE has gained access to ISO Claimsearch, a massive insurance and medical bill database to find deportation targets. The database is nearly all encompassing and contains details on more than 1.8 billion insurance claims and 58 million medical bills.

Separately, 404 Media filed a lawsuit against ICE in September for access to the agency’s $2 million spyware contract.

If you want to support this work, become a paid subscriber here. If you would like to make a larger, tax deductible donation, please email us at donate@404media.co.




House committee approves subpoena of journalist for Venezuela reporting


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

A motion introduced today by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., to subpoena journalist Seth Harp passed unanimously in the House Oversight Committee. Luna accused Harp of “leaking classified intel about Operation Absolute Resolve, including doxxing a Delta Force commander.”

The motion was apparently in response to Harp’s reporting the name and publicly available online biography of the commander involved in the abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. Politico reports that the subpoena appears to have arisen from an agreement between Luna and California Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia to issue a flurry of subpoenas, including some relating to Jeffrey Epstein. Garcia reportedly supported the Harp subpoena.

Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) Chief of Advocacy Seth Stern said:

“Journalists don’t work for the government and can’t ‘leak’ government information — to the contrary, it’s their job to find and publish the news, whether the government wants it made public or not. Identifying government officials by name is not doxxing or harassment, no matter how many times Trump allies say otherwise. Reporters have a constitutional right to publish even classified leaks, as long as they don’t commit any crimes to obtain them, but Harp merely published information that was publicly available about someone at the center of the world’s biggest news story. In 2024, the House unanimously passed the PRESS Act to protect journalists from subpoenas about their newsgathering. The bill died after Trump ordered the Senate to kill it on Truth Social. Apparently, so did the principles of Reps. Luna, Garcia, and their colleagues.”

Chip Gibbons, policy director at Defending Rights & Dissent, said:

“Rep. Luna’s subpoena of investigative reporter Seth Harp is clearly designed to chill and intimidate a journalist doing some of the most significant investigative reporting on U.S. Special Forces. Her own statement makes clear that far from having a valid legislative purpose, she seeks to hold a journalist ‘accountable’ for what is essentially reporting she dislikes. Her rationale is based on easily debunkable disinformation. Harp did not share classified information about the U.S. regime change operation in Venezuela. And even if he had, his actions would firmly be protected by the First Amendment. This is a dangerous assault on the press freedom, as well as the U.S. people’s right to know. It is shameful it passed the committee.”

Bobby Block, executive director of Florida’s First Amendment Foundation, added:

“This is a naked attempt to intimidate a journalist for doing his job. Rep. Luna’s own words make clear this subpoena has no legitimate legislative purpose — it’s about punishing reporting she doesn’t like. That kind of abuse of power strikes at the heart of the First Amendment and threatens the public’s right to know.”

Please contact us if you would like further comment.


freedom.press/issues/house-com…



Trump punta su Starlink di Musk per liberare internet in Iran

Per vedere altri post come questo, segui la comunità @Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)

Il regime di Teheran spegne Internet nel mezzo delle proteste e il presidente Usa Trump sta valutando una serie di possibili opzioni. Al centro del confronto anche l'uso del servizio di connettività satellitare di Elon Musk. Il blackout



The Mullah Regime’s Assault on Digital Freedom: Lessons from Iran and the Taming of Global Net Politics


By Schoresch Davoodi, Board Member of Pirate Party International, Delegate for European Policy and Member of the Foreign Policy Working Group in Pirate Party of Germany

Published in Pirate Times, January 9, 2026


The protests raging across Iran since late December 2025 lay bare the Mullah-Regime’s vulnerability—and its ruthless reliance on digital repression to survive. Born from economic desperation—galloping inflation, blackouts plunging cities into darkness, and water shortages threatening survival—these demonstrations have swiftly transcended grievances, erupting into a nationwide demand for the Islamic Republic’s downfall.

In Tehran, Isfahan, Shiraz, and dozens more cities, voices rise in unison: “Death to the Dictator,” aimed squarely at Supreme Leader Khamenei. This is not transient anger but a profound revolution against a regime that lavishes billions on proxies like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis while its people endure crumbling infrastructure and environmental collapse.

Tehran itself, once a beacon of modernity, now embodies this decay—its ground sinking, its air toxic, as I recently highlighted on X linking to a stark video: “How Tehran Became an Awful Place to Live”. From my family’s enduring resistance to tyranny and my work in the Pirate Party International (PPI), I see Iran’s crisis as inseparable from a worldwide erosion of digital freedoms: the “taming” of online activism in the West and the selective hypocrisies that fracture universal human rights.

The Digital Siege


The regime’s survival hinges on a meticulously engineered digital siege. Cloudflare and NetBlocks data confirm a 30-40% plunge in traffic, with pinpoint blackouts in hotspots and relentless VPN assaults—tools outlawed without state approval since 2024. This is no accident; it is designed to fracture coordination, bury atrocity evidence, and isolate protesters from the world, turning their fight invisible.

In my 2023 Flaschenpost interview, I exposed the regime’s relentless fabrications, mirrored by its “Axis of Autocracies” allies—Russia, China, Iran—in corrupting open discourse. They insist only “leftist” revolts are authentic, a Soviet relic I’ve repeatedly challenged, dismissing Iran’s organic uprising as foreign-orchestrated while throttling its digital pulse. Such deceit exposes a deeper rot: fierce outrage against certain censors, yet tacit tolerance when ideology aligns.

The “Taming” of Net Politics


This Iranian ordeal finds a chilling parallel in Babak Tubis’s piercing January 2, 2026, PPI piece, “The Taming of Net Politics: HateAid as a Cautionary Tale for Digital Freedom”. As my PPI colleague and Iranian-rooted advocate, Tubis reveals how grassroots digital activism surrenders to state symbiosis, losing its defiant edge.

HateAid, launched to shield hate victims, became a Digital Services Act (DSA) “Trusted Flagger,” only to incur U.S. sanctions amid transatlantic digital strife in December 2025. Tubis captures the peril:

“HateAid fits this pattern perfectly. As a state-funded organisation with accelerated flagging privileges under the DSA’s trusted-flagger framework, it has moved from grassroots support for victims of online violence into a semi-institutional role inside the regulatory apparatus.”


This exposure invites autocrats to exploit legal levers for suppression. As I questioned on X: “Is fighting online hate worth trading digital freedom for state ties & censorship tools? Pirate Parties warn: HateAid’s path shows the risks.” Western excuses for censorship—”protecting democracy” from misinformation—eerily echo the Mullahs’ blackout justifications, eroding Kantian Mündigkeit, our capacity for independent thought, in favor of technocratic overseers.

The Silence of the Left


Our Pirate heritage, forged in Enlightenment principles, demands we confront hatred without sacrificing pluralism or trading autonomy for institutional favor. In Iran, regime disinformation permeates Western channels via lobbyists and influencers, breeding unchallenged myths. I’ve long unmasked German left-wing parties—the SPD and Greens—tethered by historic bonds to the Islamic Republic, recycling Soviet narratives that undermine legitimate opposition.

The Pirate Party Hesse’s 2023 indictment, “Proteste im Iran – und die politische Linke schaut weg”, stands as a beacon: the left bypasses a truly progressive revolution it should champion, favoring doctrine over universal rights. Hesse embodies consistency, upholding digital and liberal freedoms as indivisible. By contrast, Baden-Württemberg, despite past boldness (such as their September 2024 probe of political Islam), has offered no voice on this latest surge.

These inconsistencies lay bare ethical fractures, illuminated in Hesse’s 2025 reflection by Nasrin Amirsedghi, “Freiheit, die den Hass schützt – Frankfurt und der moralische Bankrott”. It probes how assembly rights can harbor venom, bolstering democracy’s enemies much like Mullah agents exploit Western indulgence for propaganda.

A Call for Solidarity


PPI’s January 3, 2026, affirmation, “Solidarity with Iran: PPI Supports the Path to a Democratic Future”, anchors our resolve. We envision a secular democracy amplifying liberties, urging an Iranian Pirate Party for non-violent digital resistance—via tools like Starlink, long my advocacy against throttling.

The regime totters. Victory requires urgency:

  • Compel Elon Musk for Starlink access.
  • Expel regime diplomats and sanction oppressors.
  • Demand the Revolutionary Guards’ listing as a terrorist organization.

As I declared on X honoring Hannover’s Jina Mahsa Amini square: Freedom defies borders; we champion it everywhere. The Islamic Republic will soon be a dark footnote in the history of Iran. Democracy rises.


piratetimes.info/the-mullah-re…



Upcoming TBR Community Dinner & ShotSpotter Presentations


The Black Response will host three community dinners to share presentations on ShotSpotter surveillance devices in Cambridge. The first event will be Thursday, January 22nd at 6pm at The Community Art Center. We encourage all Pirate Party supporters to attend this presentation. The community dinner is a potluck, so please bring some food to share.

The Community Art Center is at 119 Windsor Street, Cambridge. It is a nine minute walk from Central Square and the MBTA Red Line stop there.

The second event will be on Wednesday, February 11th at CIC Cambridge. It is at 1 Broadway in Kendall Square a short walk from the MBTA Red Line stop. The third event will be in March. All events are on our calendar.

Past TBR ShotSpotter presentations:

youtube.com/embed/pnnokS7YtiY?…

youtube.com/embed/QpoNnNDKyEo?…

youtube.com/embed/bFeNPdgpS4Q?…


masspirates.org/blog/2026/01/0…




[2026-01-15] Laboratorio Aperto @ Matrici Aperte


Laboratorio Aperto

Matrici Aperte - Via Elia Capriolo 41C, Brescia
(giovedì, 15 gennaio 15:00)
Laboratorio Aperto
LABORATORIO APERTO

Tutti i Martedì (14:00-23:00) e i Giovedì (14:00-21:00) Matrici apre il laboratorio per chi ha bisogno di stampare ma anche per chi vuole solo bere un bicchiere in compagnia!
Potete venire a fare serigrafia, incisione calcografica, xilografia e tecniche grafiche sperimentali.
Per l'utilizzo del laboratorio chiediamo un contributo libero a supporto del progetto. Portate carta e matrici da casa, noi mettiamo a disposizione strumenti e spazio per i vostri lavori.
Ci sono due postazioni serigrafiche, due torchi calcografici, sala acidi e piani da inchiostrazione.
Dalle 18.00 (ma anche dalle 14.00 per lx ubriaconx) apre il baretto con vino, birre, pirli e gin tonic di pessima qualità! -c'è pure il pinkanello!-Chi suona strumenti è ben accettx.
Sarà aperto e consultabile anche l'archivio con libri serigrafici, fanzine e distro a supporto di movimenti e collettivi!


lasitua.org/event/laboratorio-…



[2026-01-17] CENA SOCIALE + ESTRAZIONE LOTTERIA @ circolo anarchico bruzzi-malatesta


CENA SOCIALE + ESTRAZIONE LOTTERIA

circolo anarchico bruzzi-malatesta - Via Torricelli 19, milano
(sabato, 17 gennaio 19:30)
CENA SOCIALE + ESTRAZIONE LOTTERIA
CENA SOCIALE + ESTRAZIONE LOTTERIA Benefit inguaiate/i con la legge

Menù:

Aperitivo cibo di strada by LE PITTULE CREW

Primo:

MEZZE MANICHE CON RAGÙ DI TOFU

Secondo:

PEPERONATA GIALLOROSSA

*Primo + Secondo + Primo bicchiere di vino 10€


puntello.org/event/cena-social…



[2026-01-17] CONCERTO BENEFIT INGUAIATI CON LA LEGGE #18 @ COX18


CONCERTO BENEFIT INGUAIATI CON LA LEGGE #18

COX18 - Via Conchetta 18, Milano
(sabato, 17 gennaio 22:30)
CONCERTO BENEFIT INGUAIATI CON LA LEGGE #18
CONCERTO BENEFIT INGUAIATI CON LA LEGGE #18

Sabato 17 Gennaio 2025

CSOA COX18

Via Conchetta, 18 - Milano

h. 22:30

CHAIN CULT (Athens)

ASTIO (Trento)

ZIPPER (Milano)

@chaincultband

@astio_totale

@milano_diy_hardcore

Flyer @willxashes


puntello.org/event/concerto-be…

#18



Avventure domotiche con Zigbee


@Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)
TL;DR Una serie di chiacchierate tra colleghi sulla domotica domestica mi ha stimolato a scrivere un articolo per aiutare chi sta affacciandosi al mondo dell'automazione domestica.
Source

L'articolo proviene dal blog #ZeroZone di zerozone.it/arduino-esp-e-iot/…



Guerra civile Rai. Perché un programma non può attaccare un altro


@Giornalismo e disordine informativo
articolo21.org/2026/01/guerra-…
“Tocca ricordare un’ovvietà: non si può usare uno spazio Rai per dare addosso a un altro programma Rai, con minacce annesse. Visto quanto accade, è però necessario ribadirlo,



La posizione dell'UE in merito a quanto sta avvenendo in Iran può essere vista come squallida o coraggiosa, a secondo che uno si ricordi o meno di quale sia stata (ed è) quella nei confronti di Israele.





Trentini libero: finalmente!


@Giornalismo e disordine informativo
articolo21.org/2026/01/trentin…
Alberto Trentini è libero: finalmente! Nessun’altra esclamazione ha senso di fronte a una notizia che abbiamo atteso per oltre quattrocento giorni. È il compimento di una battaglia che abbiamo combattuto in prima persona anche quando a occuparci delle sorti del cooperante veneziano eravamo



Si vede da come mi vede


A volte non serve lo specchio per capire chi siamo. Basta uno sguardo. Quello di chi ci incrocia distrattamente in metropolitana, o quello più intenso di chi ci conosce davvero. È buffo, ma finiamo sempre per misurarci con il riflesso che gli altri ci restituiscono, come se la nostra identità fosse una foto sfocata che solo gli occhi altrui riescono a mettere a fuoco. Ci si abitua presto a vivere sotto osservazione, anche quando nessuno ci guarda. In fondo, siamo animali sociali: abbiamo bisogno di sentirci visti per credere di esistere.

noblogo.org/lalchimistadigital…



#Iran, la guerra prima della guerra


altrenotizie.org/iran-la-guerr…




With xAI's Grok generating endless semi-nude images of women and girls without their consent, it follows a years-long legacy of rampant abuse on the platform.

With xAIx27;s Grok generating endless semi-nude images of women and girls without their contest, it follows a years-long legacy of rampant abuse on the platform.#grok #ElonMusk #AI #csam


Grok's AI Sexual Abuse Didn't Come Out of Nowhere


The biggest AI story of the first week of 2026 involves Elon Musk’s Grok chatbot turning the social media platform into an AI child sexual imagery factory, seemingly overnight.

I’ve said several times on the 404 Media podcast and elsewhere that we could devote an entire beat to “loser shit.” What’s happening this week with Grok—designed to be the horny edgelord AI companion counterpart to the more vanilla ChatGPT or Claude—definitely falls into that category. People are endlessly prompting Grok to make nude and semi-nude images of women and girls, without their consent, directly on their X feeds and in their replies.

Sometimes I feel like I’ve said absolutely everything there is to say about this topic. I’ve been writing about nonconsensual synthetic imagery before we had half a dozen different acronyms for it, before people called it “deepfakes” and way before “cheapfakes” and “shallowfakes” were coined, too. Almost nothing about the way society views this material has changed in the seven years since it’s come about, because fundamentally—once it’s left the camera and made its way to millions of people’s screens—the behavior behind sharing it is not very different from images made with a camera or stolen from someone’s Google Drive or private OnlyFans account. We all agreed in 2017 that making nonconsensual nudes of people is gross and weird, and today, occasionally, someone goes to jail for it, but otherwise the industry is bigger than ever. What’s happening on X right now is an escalation of the way it’s always been, and almost everywhere on the internet.

💡
Do you know anything else about what's going on inside X? Or are you someone who's been targeted by abusive AI imagery? I would love to hear from you. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at sam.404. Otherwise, send me an email at sam@404media.co.

The internet has an incredibly short memory. It would be easy to imagine Twitter Before Elon as a harmonious and quaint microblogging platform, considering the four years After Elon have, comparatively, been a rolling outhouse fire. But even before it was renamed X, Twitter was one of the places for this content. It used to be (and for some, still is) an essential platform for getting discovered and going viral for independent content creators, and as such, it’s also where people are massively harassed. A few years ago, it was where people making sexually explicit AI images went to harass female cosplayers. Before that, it was (and still is) host to real-life sexual abuse material, where employers could search your name and find videos of the worst day of your life alongside news outlets and memes. Before that, it was how Gamergate made the jump from 4chan to the mainstream. The things that happen in Telegram chats and private Discord channels make the leap to Twitter and end up on the news.

What makes the situation this week with Grok different is that it’s all happening directly on X. Now, you don’t need to use Stable Diffusion or Nano Banana or Civitai to generate nonconsensual imagery and then take it over to Twitter to do some damage. X has become the Everything App that Elon always wanted, if “everything” means all the tools you need to fuck up someone’s life, in one place.

Inside the Telegram Channel Jailbreaking Grok Over and Over Again
Putting people in bikinis is just the tip of the iceberg. On Telegram, users are finding ways to make Grok do far worse.
404 MediaEmanuel Maiberg


This is the culmination of years and years of rampant abuse on the platform. Reporting from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the organization platforms report to when they find instances of child sexual abuse material which then reports to the relevant authorities, shows that Twitter, and eventually X, has been one of the leading hosts of CSAM every year for the last seven years. In 2019, the platform reported 45,726 instances of abuse to NCMEC’s Cyber Tipline. In 2020, it was 65,062. In 2024, it was 686,176. These numbers should be considered with the caveat that platforms voluntarily report to NCMEC, and more reports can also mean stronger moderation systems that catch more CSAM when it appears. But the scale of the problem is still apparent. Jack Dorsey’s Twitter was a moderation clown show much of the time. But moderation on Elon Musk’s X, especially against abusive imagery, is a total failure.

In 2023, the BBC reported that insiders believed the company was “no longer able to protect users from trolling, state-co-ordinated disinformation and child sexual exploitation” following Musk’s takeover in 2022 and subsequent sacking of thousands of workers on moderation teams. This is all within the context that one of Musk’s go-to insults for years was “pedophile,” to the point that the harassment he stoked drove a former Twitter employee into hiding and went to federal court because he couldn't stop calling someone a “pedo.” Invoking pedophelia is a common thread across many conspiracy networks, including QAnon—something he’s dabbled in—but Musk is enabling actual child sexual abuse on the platform he owns.

Generative AI is making all of this worse. In 2024, NCMEC saw 6,835 reports of generative artificial intelligence related to child sexual exploitation (across the internet, not just X). By September 2025, the year-to-date reports had hit 440,419. Again, these are just the reports identified by NCMEC, not every instance online, and as such is likely a conservative estimate.

When I spoke to online child sexual exploitation experts in December 2023, following our investigation into child abuse imagery found in LAION-5B, they told me that this kind of material isn’t victimless just because the images don’t depict “real” children or sex acts. AI image generators like Grok and many others are used by offenders to groom and blackmail children, and muddy the waters for investigators to discern actual photographs from fake ones.

Grok’s AI CSAM Shitshow
We are experiencing world events like the kidnapping of Maduro through the lens of the most depraved AI you can imagine.
404 MediaJason Koebler


“Rather than coercing sexual content, offenders are increasingly using GAI tools to create explicit images using the child’s face from public social media or school or community postings, then blackmail them,” NCMEC wrote in September. “This technology can be used to create or alter images, provide guidelines for how to groom or abuse children or even simulate the experience of an explicit chat with a child. It’s also being used to create nude images, not just sexually explicit ones, that are sometimes referred to as ‘deepfakes.’ Often done as a prank in high schools, these images are having a devastating impact on the lives and futures of mostly female students when they are shared online.”

The only reason any of this is being discussed now, and the only reason it’s ever discussed in general—going back to Gamergate and beyond—is because many normies, casuals, “the mainstream,” and cable news viewers have just this week learned about the problem and can’t believe how it came out of nowhere. In reality, deepfakes came from a longstanding hobby community dedicated to putting women’s faces on porn in Photoshop, and before that with literal paste and scissors in pinup magazines. And as Emanuel wrote this week, not even Grok’s AI CSAM problem popped up out of nowhere; it’s the result of weeks of quiet, obsessive work by a group of people operating just under the radar.

And this is where we are now: Today, several days into Grok’s latest scandal, people are using an AI image generator made by a man who regularly boosts white supremacist thought to create images of a woman slaughtered by an ICE agent in front of the whole world less than 24 hours ago to “put her in a bikini.

As journalist Katie Notopoulos pointed out, a quick search of terms like “make her” shows people prompting Grok with images of random women, saying things like “Make her wear clear tapes with tiny black censor bar covering her private part protecting her privacy and make her chest and hips grow largee[sic] as she squatting with leg open widely facing back, while head turn back looking to camera” at a rate of several times a minute, every minute, for days.

A good way to get a sense of just how fast the AI undressed/nudify requests to Grok are coming in is to look at the requests for it t.co/ISMpp2PdFU
— Katie Notopoulos (@katienotopoulos) January 7, 2026


In 2018, less than a year after reporting that first story on deepfakes, I wrote about how it’s a serious mistake to ignore the fact that nonconsensual imagery, synthetic or not, is a societal sickness and not something companies can guardrail against into infinity. “Users feed off one another to create a sense that they are the kings of the universe, that they answer to no one. This logic is how you get incels and pickup artists, and it’s how you get deepfakes: a group of men who see no harm in treating women as mere images, and view making and spreading algorithmically weaponized revenge porn as a hobby as innocent and timeless as trading baseball cards,” I wrote at the time. “That is what’s at the root of deepfakes. And the consequences of forgetting that are more dire than we can predict.”

A little over two years ago, when AI-generated sexual images of Taylor Swift flooding X were the thing everyone was demanding action and answers for, we wrote a prediction: “Every time we publish a story about abuse that’s happening with AI tools, the same crowd of ‘techno-optimists’ shows up to call us prudes and luddites. They are absolutely going to hate the heavy-handed policing of content AI companies are going to force us all into because of how irresponsible they’re being right now, and we’re probably all going to hate what it does to the internet.”

It’s possible we’re still in a very weird fuck-around-and-find-out period before that hammer falls. It’s also possible the hammer is here, in the form of recently-enacted federal laws like the Take It Down Act and more than two dozen piecemeal age verification bills in the U.S. and more abroad that make using the internet an M. C. Escher nightmare, where the rules around adult content shift so much we’re all jerking it to egg yolks and blurring our feet in vacation photos. What matters most, in this bizarre and frequently disturbing era, is that the shareholders are happy.




"They're being told that this is inevitable," a member of the 806 Data Center Resistance told 404 Media. "But Texas is this other beast."

"Theyx27;re being told that this is inevitable," a member of the 806 Data Center Resistance told 404 Media. "But Texas is this other beast."#AI #News


Texans Are Fighting a 6,000 Acre Nuclear-Powered Datacenter


Billionaire Toby Neugebauer laughed when the Amarillo City Council asked him how he planned to handle the waste his planned datacenter would produce.

“I’m not laughing in disrespect to your question,” Neugebauer said. He explained that he’d just met with Texas Governor Greg Abbott, who had made it clear that any nuclear waste Neugebauer’s datacenter generated needed to go to Nevada, a state that’s not taking nuclear waste at the moment. “The answer is we don't have a great long term solution for how we’re doing nuclear waste.
playlist.megaphone.fm?p=TBIEA2…
The meeting happened on October 28, 2025 and was one of a series of appearances Neugebauer has put in before Amarillo’s leaders as he attempts to realize Project Matador: a massive 5,769 acre datacenter being built in the Texas Panhandle and constructed by Fermi America, a company he founded with former Secretary of Energy Rick Perry.

If built, Project Matador would be one of the largest datacenters in the world at around 18 million square feet. “What we’re talking about is creating the epicenter for artificial intelligence in the United States,” Neugebauer told the council. According to Neugebauer, the United States is in an existential race to build AI infrastructure. He sees it as a national security issue.

“You’re blessed to sit on the best place to develop AI compute in America,” he told Amarillo. “I just finished with Palantir, which is our nation’s tip of the spear in the AI war. They know that this is the place that we must do this. They’ve looked at every site on the planet. I was at the Department of War yesterday. So anyone who thinks this is some casual conversation about the mission critical aspect of this is just not being truthful.”

But it’s unclear if Palantir wants any part of Project Matador. One unnamed client—rumored to be Amazon—dropped out of the project in December and cancelled a $150 million contract with Fermi America. The news hit the company’s stock hard, sending its value into a tailspin and triggering a class action lawsuit from investors.

Yet construction continues. The plan says it’ll take 11 years to build out the massive datacenter, which will first be powered by a series of natural gas generators before the planned nuclear reactors come online.

Amarillo residents aren’t exactly thrilled at the prospect. A group called 806 Data Center Resistance has formed in opposition to the project’s construction. Kendra Kay, a tattoo artist in the area and a member of 806, told 404 Media that construction was already noisy and spiking electricity bills for locals.

“When we found out how big it was, none of us could really comprehend it,” she said. “We went out to the site and we were like, ‘Oh my god, this thing is huge.’ There’s already construction underway of one of four water tanks that hold three million gallons of water.”

For Kay and others, water is the core issue. It’s a scarce resource in the panhandle and Amarillo and other cities in the area already fight for every drop. “The water is the scariest part,” she said. “They’re asking for 2.5 million gallons per day. They said that they would come back, probably in six months, to ask for five million gallons per day. And then, after that, by 2027 they would come back and ask for 10 million gallons per day.”
youtube.com/embed/qDgIPg1Epb4?…
During an October 15 city council meeting, Neugebauer told the city that Fermi would get its water “with or without” an agreement from the city. “The only difference is whether Amarillo benefits.” To many people it sounded like a threat, but Neugebauer got his deal and the city agreed to sell water to Fermi America for double the going rate.

“It wasn’t a threat,” Neugebauer said during another meeting on October 28. “I know people took my answer…as a threat. I think it’s a win-win. I know there are other water projects we can do…we fully got that the water was going to be issue 1, 2, and 3.”

“We can pay more for water than the consumer can. Which allows you all capital to be able to re-invest in other water projects,” he said. “I think what you’re gonna find is having a customer who can pay way more than what you wanna burden your constituents with will actually enhance your water availability issues.”

According to Neugebauer and plans filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the datacenter would generate and consume 11 gigawatts of power. The bulk of that, eventually, would be generated by four nuclear reactors. But nuclear reactors are complicated and expensive to make and everyone who has attempted to build one in the past few decades has gone over budget and they weren’t trying to build nuclear power plants in the desert.

Nuclear reactors, like datacenters, consume a lot of water. Because of that, most nuclear reactors are constructed near massive bodies of water and often near the ocean. “The viewpoint that nuclear reactors can only be built by streams and oceans is actually the opposite,” Neugebauer told the Amarillo city council in the meeting on October 28.

As evidence he pointed to the Palo Verde nuclear plant in Arizona. The massive Palo Verde plant is the only nuclear plant in the world not constructed near a ready source of water. It gets the water it needs by taking on the waste and sewage water of every city and town nearby.

That’s not the plan with Project Matador, which will use water sold to it by Amarillo and pulled from the nearby Ogallala Aquifer. “I am concerned that we’re going to run out of water and that this is going to change it from us having 30 years worth of water for agriculture to much less very quickly,” Kay told 404 Media.

The Ogallala Aquifer runs under parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. It’s the primary source of water for the Texas panhandle and it’s drying out.

“They don’t know how much faster because, despite how quickly this thing is moving, we don’t have any idea how much water they’re realistically going to use or need, so we don’t even know how to calculate the difference,” Kay said. “Below Lubbock, they’ve been running out of water for a while. The priority of this seems really stupid.”

According to Kay, communities near the datacenter feel trapped as they watch the construction grind on. “They’ve all lived here for several generations…they’re being told that this is inevitable. Fermi is going up to them and telling them ‘this is going to happen whether you like it or not so you might as well just sell me your property.’”

Kay said she and other activists have been showing up to city council meetings to voice their concerns and tell leaders not to approve permits for the datacenter and nuclear plants. Other communities across the country have successfully pushed datacenter builders out of their community. “But Texas is this other beast,” Kay said.

Jacinta Gonzalez, the head of programs for MediaJustice and her team have helped 806 Data Center Resistance get up and running and teaching it tactics they’ve seen pay off in other states. “In Tucson, Arizona we were able to see the city council vote ‘no’ to offer water to Project Blue, which was a huge proposed Amazon datacenter happening there,” she said. “If you look around, everywhere from Missouri to Indiana to places in Georgia, we’re seeing communities pass moratoriums, we’re seeing different projects withdraw their proposals because communities find out about it and are able to mobilize and organize against this.”

“The community in Amarillo is still figuring out what that’s going to look like for them,” she said. “These are really big interests. Rick Perry. Palantir. These are not folks who are used to hearing ‘no’ or respecting community wishes. So the community will have to be really nimble and up for a fight. We don’t know what will happen if we organize, but we definitely know what will happen if we don’t.”


#ai #News #x27


404 Media has obtained material that explains how Tangles and Webloc, two surveillance systems ICE recently purchased, work. Webloc can track phones without a warrant and follow their owners home or to their employer.#ICE


Inside ICE’s Tool to Monitor Phones in Entire Neighborhoods


A social media and phone surveillance system ICE bought access to is designed to monitor a city neighborhood or block for mobile phones, track the movements of those devices and their owners over time, and follow them from their places of work to home or other locations, according to material that describes how the system works obtained by 404 Media.

Commercial location data, in this case acquired from hundreds of millions of phones via a company called Penlink, can be queried without a warrant, according to an internal ICE legal analysis shared with 404 Media. The purchase comes squarely during ICE’s mass deportation effort and continued crackdown on protected speech, alarming civil liberties experts and raising questions on what exactly ICE will use the surveillance system for.

💡
Do you know anything else about this tool? Do you work for ICE, CBP, or another agency? I would love to hear from you. Using a non-work device, you can message me securely on Signal at joseph.404 or send me an email at joseph@404media.co.

“This is a very dangerous tool in the hands of an out-of-control agency. This granular location information paints a detailed picture of who we are, where we go, and who we spend time with,” Nathan Freed Wessler, deputy project director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, told 404 Media.

This post is for subscribers only


Become a member to get access to all content
Subscribe now


#ice


At least four videos show what really happened when ICE shot a woman in Minneapolis on Wednesday. DHS has established itself as an agency that cannot be trusted to live in or present reality.#ICE


DHS Is Lying To You


A maroon Honda Pilot SUV sits perpendicular across a residential road in Minneapolis. At the time, federal authorities were in the neighborhood as part of the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) recently announced surge of thousands of officials. A silver Nissan Titan drives up the road and stops because the Honda is blocking its path. Two officers dressed in body armor, pouches, and badges saying “police” exit the Nissan.

The two people walk towards the Honda. Someone can be heard saying “get out of the fucking car.” One of them tries to open the driver’s door and reach through the open window. The driver of the Honda reverses and turns, getting straighter with the road. The driver then slowly accelerates and starts to turn to the right, leveling the car out with its front pointing away from the two officers.

A third officer, who has been standing on the other side of the road, pulls out a firearm while the car is turning away from him and fires into the car three times. The officer fires two of the shots when the vehicle is already well past him. He is not in front of the car, but to the side. The officer calmly holsters his weapon.

This post is for subscribers only


Become a member to get access to all content
Subscribe now


#ice



Varese Possibile e l’On. Grimaldi chiedono chiarimenti sui fatti di Lonate Pozzolo
possibile.com/varese-possibile…
Movimenti e gruppi musicali di estrema destra che inneggiano apertamente al nazismo e alla violenza hanno trovato accoglienza negli spazi della Pro Loco di Lonate Pozzolo per un



Centomila uomini per l’autonomia europea? Il piano di Kubilius

@Notizie dall'Italia e dal mondo

Può l’Unione europea garantire la propria sicurezza senza dipendere in modo strutturale dagli Stati Uniti? È da questa domanda che prende forma l’intervento di Andrius Kubilius, commissario europeo per la Difesa, deciso a riportare al centro del dibattito una scelta che l’Europa ha finora





Raccolta dati e AI, come informare correttamente gli interessati: le raccomandazioni


@Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)
La CNIL chiarisce come informare gli utenti/interessati quando si utilizzano sistemi di intelligenza artificiale, rendendo note delle linee guida molto operative e altrettanto dettagliate circa gli obblighi di trasparenza quando si raccolgono



Cos’è la guerra cognitiva e qual è la posizione della NATO


@Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)
Il paradigma della sicurezza globale è al centro di un cambiamento sostanziale. La NATO ha formalizzato la guerra cognitiva come nuova frontiera per la superiorità strategica. Cosa è la guerra cognitiva e quali sono i rischi che la caratterizzano
L'articolo Cos’è la guerra cognitiva e qual è la posizione della NATO



Il primo ministro britannico Starmer cerca sostegno per un divieto internazionale di X

Per vedere altri post sull' #IntelligenzaArtificiale, segui la comunità @Intelligenza Artificiale

Il primo ministro britannico Keir Starmer è in trattative con Canada e Australia nel tentativo di ottenere sostegno per un possibile divieto internazionale del

Maronno Winchester reshared this.



Il caso OVH, quando il Canada sfida la sovranità digitale UE: i rischi per i nostri dati


@Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)
Un tribunale canadese ha ordinato a OVHcloud di consegnare dati di clienti archiviati in Europa, creando un conflitto con il diritto francese e mettendo alla prova la sovranità digitale europea. Un caso in cui non è la geografia dei

filobus reshared this.



it.finance.yahoo.com/notizie/l…

evidentemente per i mercati bombardare sta diventando sempre più un segno di debolezza, incapacità e impotenza più che di forza...la forza è il rifugio degli incompetenti.



📣 #IscrizioniOnline, tra pochi giorni si potrà presentare la domanda per il I e il II ciclo di istruzione, per i percorsi di istruzione e formazione professionale (IeFP) e per le scuole paritarie che, su base volontaria, aderiscono alla modalità tele…



Perché c’è scazzo politico sulla multa di Agcom a Cloudflare. E i Big del Web stanno tutti con Prince

Per vedere altri post come questo, segui la comunità @Informatica (Italy e non Italy 😁)

Grandinata di opinioni sul caso Agcom - Cloudflare destinato a diventare politico e forse persino di rilievo internazionale. Ben poche le voci a difesa della

reshared this

in reply to Informa Pirata

la questione è tutt'altro che banale, per diversi motivi. Il primo sono i confini giurisdizionali, l'altro è la presenza di attori transnazionali talmente grandi e potenti da poter addirittura tener testa, se non oltre, a Governi nazionali.
in reply to Informa Pirata

Re: Perché c’è scazzo politico sulla multa di Agcom a Cloudflare.


@informapirata@poliverso.org @informatica@feddit.it forse il caso non può restare informatico perchè da quel lato li non siamo in grado di risolverlo:
1. basare un sistema Paese su un unico servizio CDN è "particolare" nel 2026;
2. sentirsi minacciati proprio perchè presente il punto 1 è "particolare" nel 2026.

Il sonno profondo degli ultimi ventanni in ambito informatico, ogni tanto si fa sentire e salta fuori come un macigno, ma nessuno se ne preoccupa.

PS: durante quel sonno, gli altri facevano cose come Cloudflare.

Questa voce è stata modificata (18 minuti fa)


Proteste in Iran, violenza e diplomazia: la crisi si allarga


@Notizie dall'Italia e dal mondo
Mentre la leadership iraniana cerca di contenere le manifestazioni e gli Stati Uniti lanciano minacce, le restrizioni alle comunicazioni imposte dalle autorità rendono difficile accertare il numero reale di morti e feriti. Alcuni parlano di mille uccisi, altri di centinaia
L'articolo



LA PACE

Da bambino, quando guardavo i film western, ci credevo.
Credevo al messaggio del trionfo della civiltà sull’uomo selvatico, alla sconfitta del male di fronte al bene rappresentato dall’uomo bianco emblema del buono, del giusto, del forte e simbolo di una civiltà da sostenere per lo sviluppo della società moderna.
Non avevo capito che ci stavano educando alla sopraffazione del debole, alla guerra di espansione, al furto di un continente e delle sue risorse, e alla necessità di sterminare gli indiani per defraudarli di un loro diritto, della loro terra, della loro stessa vita.
E non avevo neppure capito che quella era una lotta impari, che avrebbe sopraffatto i veri proprietari di quel posto, che avrebbe annientato una cultura preziosa, uccisi degli uomini, cancellato il diritto all’esistenza di quella gente.
Pensavo, nella mia infantile innocenza, che americani e indiani fossero atavici nemici, ma che un bel giorno avrebbero finalmente fumato il calumet della pace e convissuto assieme felici e amici.
Mi era sembrato addirittura che i cowboy erano i legittimi proprietari dell’America "scoperta" da Colombo, e che gli indiani stessero tentando, con i loro obsolescenti mezzi, e la loro turpe straniera cattiveria, di scacciarli via per impossessarsene.
Non avevo capito che il messaggio che insinuavano era che loro sono i nostri nemici, e che vanno combattuti e uccisi. Che non ha importanza nient’altro tranne il fatto che sono cattivi a prescindere. Che sono i nostri nemici e basta, perché a noi conviene.
Non avevo capito niente, e oggi non è cambiato niente.
La tecnica degli arroganti è rimasta invariata. È sempre la stessa. D’altronde, squadra vincente non si cambia.
Per loro squallido tornaconto invadono, uccidono, colonizzano, sporcano con le loro mani insanguinate ogni obiettivo che possa recare loro vantaggio, ricchezza, potere. E i nemici sono sempre quelli la cui cultura è diversa: vietnamiti, iraniani, cinesi, yemeniti, palestinesi, russi.
Senza alcun ritegno mandano loro gli eserciti fin dentro casa, al fine di depredarne le risorse, e poi gridano al pericolo nucleare, al terrorismo, alla minaccia di invasione, al terzo conflitto mondiale, come se il vero pericolo fosse chi li subisce, e non loro.
Con la crudeltà che ostentano senza la benché minima dignità.
Senza la minima compassione per i vinti, per i morti, per i parenti e gli affetti dei morti. Senza alcun principio morale, senza la minima etica, senza un barlume di umanità.
È un mostro ingannevole e avido di denaro, questa Babilonia che fagocita diritti e deboli, demolisce al suo passaggio qualunque cosa che per lei sia un disvalore. Vite umane, case, affetti, pace.
Distrugge tutto, saccheggia tutto, uccide tutti.
E noi ci siamo dentro.
Alcuni, addirittura compiacenti; molti invece ignari che diamo loro appoggio permettendo che da qui partano armi, denaro, droni della morte, ospitando basi e inferni nucleari che servono a combattere guerre che non ci appartengono. Missili, soldati, aerei, morti sulla coscienza.
La globalizzazione evidentemente doveva servire a questo. Era il disegno che gli antiglobalisti avevano capito subito. Doveva servire a diradare nel nostro popolo e in tutti i popoli la luce dell’orgoglio nazionalista, a demolire il muro dello sciovinismo, la nostra sovranità, anche la nostra italiana dignità, tutto a vantaggio della loro supremazia, per celebrare questa occidentale servitù verso il più forte, verso il più ricco, verso il più potente che ci avrebbe resi finalmente liberi grazie a una discutibile — perché perversa — forma di democrazia, che libera di una libertà che incatena.
E che annulla la nostra cultura, la nostra individualità, le nostre singolari peculiarità, la nostra autodeterminazione. La nostra economia, il nostro prodotto interno, la nostra industria, il nostro commercio, la nostra agricoltura, il nostro artigianato.
Eravamo servi ieri con i western, sostenendo la logica dell’invasione, siamo servi oggi.
E intanto la gente muore, le case crollano sotto le bombe, il Papa prega, i sacerdoti riuniscono i fedeli in preghiera mentre noi contribuiamo con i nostri acquisti al mercimonio delle armi da inviare.
Con le famiglie piegate in due dal carobollette.
Ogni centesimo in più di aumento sui prodotti di consumo equivale a una pallottola che uccide una persona, ogni litro di benzina a un respiro che si spegne, ogni fiamma della caldaia a due occhi sbarrati per sempre, fissi nell’istante della fine; mentre noi, sonnolenti e abulici, sosteniamo gli sciacalli, senza riflettere su quanto sia vile far finta di niente, quanto sia incredibile veder sprecati tutti questi soldi per creare strumenti di dolore e di morte, e non, invece, medicina e sanità, istruzione e lavoro, serenità e pace, mentre tutto il mondo muore ucciso.
Dalla guerra, dalla fame, dalla cattiveria, dalle avidità, dall'egoismo, dal dolore.
Tutto questo è stomachevole, rivoltante.
E poi andiamo a letto con la coscienza sporca, ma pulita.
Perché il servo, quando è servo, fa il bene solo se obbedisce.
Mi viene in mente una citazione , stupenda, di Bonhoeffer: a forza di obbedire, tu sarai obbediente anche agli ordini del demonio.
Più che una frase, un’amara, facile profezia.

Game Over - Digital Photo





La premessa è che, essendo io contrario a qualunque forma di carcerazione, a qualunque limitazione della libertà personale—che non fosse motivata da un'urgenza rieducativa necessaria all'inserimento sociale—la liberazione dei detenuti in Venezuela mi rende felice.
Ciò che mi lascia perplesso, però, è il silenzio del passato. Non un articolo di indignazione per questi detenuti, non una riga, una presa di posizione pubblica del Governo Meloni, non una chiara condanna nei confronti di un tiranno che teneva segregati degli italiani nelle sue carceri.
Oggi, invece, dopo la discutibile perché efferata azione di guerra di Trump, che ha visto sì la deposizione di un despota, ma ci ha anche mostrato la sproporzione di forza che ha lasciato a terra, morti, un centinaio di uomini, l'entusiasmo è tutto per il "cambio di regime" che ha permesso finalmente la rottura dei ceppi, il taglio delle catene che teneva legata questa povera gente dietro le sbarre venezuelane.
Ora, lungi da me qualsiasi giudizio al riguardo (ho letto poco e conosco ancor meno i motivi della loro detenzione, così come sconosco il perché del silenzio del Governo), non appare strano che se ne parli, ora e con trionfalismo, lasciando il sospetto che se ne stia parlando solo per giustificare la protervia e l'arroganza americana che ha dimostrato con i suoi metodi violenti?
Se questi italiani erano ingiustamente reclusi nelle galere venezuelane, perché non si è fatto nulla per liberarli? Perché, essendo Maduro un despota e un tiranno, non si è mai disegnata la loro carcerazione come una prigionia politica?
Si tace, invece, quasi che il fine — cioè quello della libertà e della democrazia a tutti i costi— giustificasse l'aggressione americana, quasi la legittimasse perché, come si è visto, Maduro era un personaggio da arrestare, da perseguire, da deporre per la sua tirannide.
Non so se è così, ma a me sembra così.
Personalmente avrei preferito che, chi se ne sarebbe dovuto occupare prima con gli strumenti della diplomazia, oggi scrivesse chiaramente che, pur non rispettando il metodo di guerra che ha consentito il cambio di guardia del Venezuela —perché non è condivisibile—, si è felici per la liberazione dei detenuti italiani per i quali non si è fatto, o non si è potuto fare, niente o poco, prima.
Possibile che si debba sempre preferire la mendace propaganda alla sincerità politica?
Non so, forse mi sto sbagliando a pensare tutto questo.
Ma il dubbio che si stia tentando di spacciare un'azione da perdente (perché tale è qualsiasi atto di violenza), lascia la bocca amara.
Come se ci fosse qualcosa da chiarire, e che non verrà chiarito.

#venezuela #detenuti #italianidetenuti #governo #trump #politica #pensieri



Dalla Libia al Sudan, dalla Somalia allo Yemen: le ambizioni globali degli Emirati


@Notizie dall'Italia e dal mondo
L'intervento dell'Arabia Saudita nello Yemen ha imposto un primo stop alla strategia degli Emirati che puntano ad estendere la propria influenza militare ed economica nella penisola arabica e nel Corno d'Africa
L'articolo Dalla Libia al Sudan,



It’s Not a Leica, It’s a Lumix


There’s an old adage in photography that the best camera in the world is the one in your hand when the shot presents itself, but there’s no doubt that a better camera makes a difference to the quality of the final image. Among decent quality cameras the Leica rangefinder models have near cult-like status, but the problem is for would-be Leica owners that they carry eye-watering prices. [Cristian Băluță] approached this problem in s special way, by crafting a Leica-style body for a Panasonic Lumix camera. Given the technology relationship between the Japanese and German companies, we can see the appeal.

While the aesthetics of a Leica are an important consideration, the ergonomics such as the position of the lens on the body dictated the design choices. He was fortunate that the internal design of the Lumix gave plenty of scope for re-arrangement of parts, given that cameras are often extremely packed internally. Some rather bold surgery to the Lumix mainboard and a set of redesigned flex PCBs result in all the parts fitting in the CNC machined case, and the resulting camera certainly looks the part.

The write-up is in part a journey through discovering the process of getting parts manufactured, but it contains a lot of impressive work. Does the performance of the final result match up to its looks? We’ll leave you to be the judge of that. Meanwhile, take a look at another Leica clone.


hackaday.com/2026/01/08/its-no…