Tomorrow, Wednesday 18 May, the members of the Committee on the Economy, Consumer Protection and Digital Agenda in the Belgian Parliament will debate for the second time and then vote on a new data retention proposal. Patrick Breyer, MEP, has analysed this draft law and has submitted his Opinion to the Committee members.
The Belgian law on the subject was annulled by the Constitutional Court in 2015. The next law also ended in front of the Court, in 2021. Will the third one respect fundamental rights and stand in court? For Patrick Breyer, it is clear that it will not. He comments:
“Collecting information on the personal contacts and movements of the entire population massively threatens privacy, disrupts confidential activities and disregards rulings by our highest courts. We are running into a rule of law deficiency if the prohibition of indiscriminate data retention is ignored in such a way. And Belgium is setting a harmful precedent at EU level, while its large neighbor Germany is doing well without this kind of mass surveillance. This proposal urgently needs to be stopped and brought in line with our fundamental rights.”
What is (meta)data retention?
The Data retention is probably the most privacy-invasive most privacy-invasive surveillance tool available to the state, and allows it to collect data about our conversations in a given area: who you talk to by message or phone, for how long, how often, from where, etc. The fact that the legislator decides to use it in such a casual way and with so little regard for the basic principles of a strong democracy must be a clear signal to those who elected them.
The proposal de facto reinstates mass surveillance surveillance.
This proposal is riddled with with elements that are each more problematic than the last. The proposal provides for several overlapping forms of data retention.
« Retention is not targeted if criteria are manipulated to cover everybody », explains Breyer. He outlines in detail his concerns in his opinion (in FR). In summary :
- Mandatory retention period to combat fraud:
- Since indiscriminate data retention is not justified to support prosecuting serious crimes, combating fraud does not justify it either.
- ‘Targeted’ retention of data depending on the rate of serious crime in a given area:
- the CJEU allows targeted retention “on the understanding that there can be no question of reinstating, by this means, a generalised and undifferentiated retention of traffic data and location data .” Given the modalities chosen, however, the bill will cover the entire territory and population, de facto reinstating this generalized surveillance.
- Targeted data retention in important, strategic, vital, and other buildings:
- Only sites that “regularly receive a very large number of visitors” and are “particularly vulnerable to the commission of serious criminal offenses” can be covered. Listing in the law all the sites where many people pass through Belgium (such as the entire motorway network), does not constitute such targeting.
- Retention of data targeted at buildings of International Institutions:
- If data retention is a serious threat to democracy at the national level, I also believe that the European democratic process is threatened if Belgian authorities and intelligence services are able to access the location, traffic, and communication data of MEPs and all individuals who set foot in the perimeter surrounding the Parliament. This argument also applies to other international institutions, which should be consulted before this ‘protection’ is imposed.
- On the question of covering OTTs or not:
- A surveillance law covering OTTs would capture all confidential contact in the private, professional and government sectors.
- On the issue of encryption
- Cybersecurity and trust in the state is not given when you are an activist, investigative journalist (or his or her source) or political opponent (or even a lawyer, counselor, victim in need of anonymity) – what’s more since the Pegasus debacle. This data retention and its impact on encryption is a further step in weakening this cybersecurity and trust.
- IP addresses and other data:
- The indiscriminate retention of IP addresses and identifying data of all users of communication services in the EU, undermines the right to use the Internet and communicate anonymously.
- Moreover, the new features of IPv6 had not yet been taken into account by the Court when it allowed this retention of IP addresses, which (in light of the increased interference caused by IPv6) should lead the legislator to caution and nuance when providing for it.
patrick-breyer.de/en/tomorrow-…
Bufale.net
Unknown parent • • •informapirata ⁂
Unknown parent • • •invece è molto efficace perché destabilizza l'opinione pubblica, mette pressione ai responsabili della comunicazione e crea tensione diffusa. È in pratica una cosa a metà tra cyberguerrilla marketing e il terrorismo in franchising alla ISIS
@factcheck
Bufale.net
in reply to informapirata ⁂ • • •informapirata ⁂
in reply to Bufale.net • • •Sono giovani, rabbiosi e inca**ati, ma sono anche svegli e fantasiosi e hanno scelto avversari pieni di vulnerabilità.
Non hanno bisogno di chissà quali risorse per colpire quel poco che basta con quel poco che hanno. E forse saranno la classe dirigente della Russia di domani
informapirata ⁂
Unknown parent • • •Bufale.net
Unknown parent • • •Sono giovani, rabbiosi, ebbri di propaganda. Più che il lato tecnico è interessante il lato psicologico della generazione degli attuali ventenni cresciuta odiandoci e tantissimo
informapirata ⁂ reshared this.
Bufale.net
in reply to informapirata ⁂ • • •informapirata ⁂ reshared this.
informapirata ⁂
in reply to Bufale.net • • •il fatto che saranno la futura classe dirigente della Russia non è una cosa né positiva né negativa. Dipende dalla loro evoluzione, se prevarrà il rancore verso l'Europa e gli Stati Uniti oppure l'esigenza di aprirsi a una cultura differente; naturalmente sarà fondamentale capire se la propaganda "occidentale" saprà essere efficace come alla fine degli anni 80 oppure se la selezione artificiale da parte dell'attuale regime Russo avrà la meglio
@6al
Bufale.net
in reply to informapirata ⁂ • • •Al momento è un segnale negativo, come quando il Fantasma dei Natali Futuri dice a Scrooge che se non cambierà le cose saranno brutali. Il problema è arrivare a quel cambiamento
informapirata ⁂ reshared this.
@LucioSalis@mastodon.uno
in reply to Bufale.net • • •reshared this
informapirata ⁂, rag. Gustavino Bevilacqua e GiacomoSansoni reshared this.
informapirata ⁂
in reply to @LucioSalis@mastodon.uno • • •Questo è uno degli aspetti fondamentali che bisognerebbe spiegare a chi Sembra essere affascinato dai Paesi autoritari, ossia che in quei paesi si vive una vita straziante, si muore prima, l'abuso di potere è la regola e anche l'esercito riesce a fare pena, perché autoritarismo vuol dire soprattutto corruzione e, come ha ben spiegato Navalny nella sua lettera dell'anno scorso, la corruzione tutto uccide
informapirata.it/2021/08/20/la…
@factcheck @6al
La corruzione è causa ed effetto di ogni società disfunzionale. La toccante lettera di Alexei Navalny
informapirataGiacomoSansoni reshared this.
Bufale.net
in reply to @LucioSalis@mastodon.uno • • •informapirata ⁂ reshared this.
@LucioSalis@mastodon.uno
in reply to Bufale.net • • •Bufale.net
in reply to @LucioSalis@mastodon.uno • • •informapirata ⁂ reshared this.
@LucioSalis@mastodon.uno
in reply to informapirata ⁂ • • •@LucioSalis@mastodon.uno
in reply to Bufale.net • • •Bufale.net
in reply to @LucioSalis@mastodon.uno • • •@LucioSalis@mastodon.uno
in reply to Bufale.net • • •emiliomillepiani
in reply to @LucioSalis@mastodon.uno • •@@LucioSalis@mastodon.uno @informapirata :privacypride: @Bufale.net :verified: @6Al
..il primo ha meno del 2% di consenso elettorale, il secondo nemmeno quello...
informapirata ⁂ likes this.
informapirata ⁂ reshared this.
@LucioSalis@mastodon.uno
in reply to emiliomillepiani • • •@LucioSalis@mastodon.uno
in reply to @LucioSalis@mastodon.uno • • •