How hard can it be to create your own inductors? Get a wire. Coil it up. Right? Well, the devil is definitely in the details, and [Nick] wants to share his ten tips for building “the perfect” inductor. We don’t know about perfect, but we do think he brings up some very good points. Check out his video below.

If you are winding wire around your finger (or, as it appears in the video, a fork) or you are using a beefy ferrite core, you’ll find something interesting in the video.

Of course, the issue with inductors is that wires aren’t perfect, nor are core materials. Factors like this lead to inefficiency and loss, sometimes in a frequency-dependent way.

It looks like [Nick] is building a large switching power supply, so the subject inductor is a handful. He demonstrates some useful computational tools for analyzing data about cores, for example.

We learned a lot watching the tricks, but we were more interested in the inductor’s construction. We have to admit that the computed inductance of the coil matched quite closely to the measured value.

Need a variable inductor? No problem. Before ferrite cores, good coils were a lot harder to wind.

youtube.com/embed/PEme07iCH-s?…

hackaday.com/2025/09/04/tips-f…

In occasione del XXII Congresso dell’Associazione Luca Coscioni per la libertà di ricerca scientifica, l’Associazione Luca Coscioni, in collaborazione con la Cellula Coscioni La Spezia e SIMEPSI, presenta l’evento

Psichedelici e salute: nuove frontiere della terapia

L’appuntamento è per sabato 27 settembre alle ore 10.00 presso l’Auditorium Beghi, in via del Canaletto 100, a La Spezia. L’evento, ad accesso libero, sarà registrato e poi reso disponibile sul canale YouTube dell’Associazione Luca Coscioni all’interno della playlist “Eventi precongressuali 2025”.
L’evento è in fase di accreditamento ECM per professioni sanitarie.

PROGRAMMA

ore 10 – 13 Prima sessione
moderano: Diego Silvestri e Guido Frosina

Ore 10 – 10.30 Introduzione, saluti vari – Marco Perducaore 10.30-11.50Modulo 1 – Fondamenti teorici “Dalla ricerca alla pratica: protocolli, evidenze e applicazioni cliniche”Dott. Dario Zaccheroni “Stati non ordinari di coscienza e psicoterapia assistita da psichedelici”

Dott.ssa Susanna Lucini Paioni “Medicina Psichedelica e nuovi paradigmi in salute mentale”

Dott. Lorenzo Goppa
“Funghi medicinali, psilocibina e prospettive di ricerca “

Ore 12.00 – 13.00Modulo 2: Applicazioni cliniche “Il cervello psichedelico: meccanismi d’azione e potenzialità”

Proff. Marco Scarselli “Uso terapeutico degli psichedelici: dal meccanismo d’azione alla efficacia clinica” Prof. Ciro Conversano “Uso terapeutico degli psichedelici: dal meccanismo d’azione alla efficacia clinica”

13-14.00 pausa pranzo

dalle ore 14.00 alle ore18.00
seconda sessione

14 – 15.20
Modulo 3 – Cultura, Società e riduzione del danno

Sara Ballotti
Dall’underground alla condivisione dell’esperienza psichedelica: i cerchi di integrazione
di illuminismo Psichedelico

Simone Toneatti e ITARDDservizi di riduzione del danno, rete ITARDD

Dott. Gabriele Marino “Tutte le teste ti porti via: origine e caratteri della psichedelia musicale”

Prof.ssa Teresa Prudente “Sostanze psicoattive, allucinazione e testo letterario: casi studio, forme, implicazioni”

15.30 – 16.30
Modulo 4 – Psichedelici nelle cure palliative Dott. Luca Magnani “Accompagnamento al fine vita: dignità, significato e riduzione della sofferenza”

Ilaria Di LisoPotenzialità degli psichedelici nella malattia cronica e terminale e nel morire.” assistente spirituale

Diego Silvestri Numero Bianco

16.30
pausa caffè

16.45
Modulo 5 – confronto sui temi politici ed istituzionali locali16.45
Voci dal territorio: Spazio riservato alle ASL e agli ordini professionali di psicologi e psichiatri, consiglieri regionali Liguria e domitato di bioetica regionale + Consiglieri regionali Liguria+ comitato di bioetica regionale

17.15
Quadro normativo e prospettive future Claudia Moretti, M. Perduca

17.45
“Innovazione e tradizione in medicina: quali prospettive per la Liguria?”
discussione aperta con i relatori, ripresa del focus sulle esigenze sanitarie specifiche del territoriomodera Marco Perduca

L'articolo Evento precongressuale a La Spezia: “Psichedelici e salute: nuove frontiere della terapia” proviene da Associazione Luca Coscioni.

When you think about highly-precise actuators, stepper motors probably aren’t the first device that comes to mind. However, as [Diffraction Limited]’s sub-micron capable micro-manipulator shows, they can reach extremely fine precision when paired with external feedback.

The micro-manipulator is made of a mobile platform supported by three pairs of parallel linkages, each linkage actuated by a crank mounted on a stepper motor. Rather than attaching to the structure with the more common flexures, these linkages swivel on ball joints. To minimize the effects of friction, the linkage bars are very long compared to the balls, and the wide range of allowed angles lets the manipulator’s stage move 23 mm in each direction.

To have precision as well as range, the stepper motors needed closed-loop control, which a magnetic rotary encoder provides. The encoder can divide a single rotation of a magnet into 100,000 steps, but this wasn’t enough for [Diffraction Limited]; to increase its resolution, he attached an array of alternating-polarity magnets to the rotor and positioned the magnetic encoder near these. As the rotor turns, the encoder’s local magnetic field rotates rapidly, creating a kind of magnetic gear.

A Raspberry Pi Pico 2 and three motor drivers control this creation; even here, the attention to detail is impressive. The motor drivers couldn’t have internal charge pumps or clocked logic units, since these introduce tiny timing errors and motion jitter. The carrier circuit board is double-sided and uses through-hole components for ease of replication; in a nice touch, the lower silkscreen displays pin numbers.

To test the manipulator’s capabilities, [Diffraction Limited] used it to position a chip die under a microscope. To test its accuracy and repeatability, he traced the path a slicer generated for the first layer of a Benchy, vastly scaled-down, with the manipulator. When run slowly to reduce thermal drift, it could trace a Benchy within a 20-micrometer square, and had a resolution of about 50 nanometers.

He’s already used the micro-manipulator to couple an optical fiber with a laser, but [Diffraction Limited] has some other uses in mind, including maskless lithography (perhaps putting the stepper in “wafer stepper”), electrochemical 3D printing, focus stacking, and micromachining. For another promising take on small-scale manufacturing, check out the RepRapMicron.

youtube.com/embed/MgQbPdiuUTw?…

Thanks to [Nik282000] for the tip!

hackaday.com/2025/09/04/design…

A few years ago, I bought an 8 mm home movie camera in a second hand store. I did a teardown on it here and pulled out for your pleasure those parts of it which I considered interesting. My vague plan was to put a Raspberry Pi in it, but instead it provided a gateway into the world of 8mm film technology. Since then I’ve recreated its Single 8 cartridge as a 3D printable model, produced a digital Super 8 cartridge, and had a movie camera with me at summer hacker camps.

When I tore down that Single 8 camera though, I don’t feel I did the subject justice. I concentrated on the lens, light metering, and viewfinder parts of the system, and didn’t bring you the shutter and film advance mechanism. That camera also lacked a couple of common 8 mm camera features; its light metering wasn’t through the lens, and its zoom lens was entirely manual. It’s time to dig out another 8 mm camera for a further teardown.

A Different Camera To Tear Down

The camera with a Super 8 cartridge inserted.

My test camera is a battered and scuffed Minolta XL-250 that I found in a second hand store for not a lot. It takes Super 8 cartridges, of which I have an expired Kodachrome example for the pictures, and it has the advantage of an extremely well-thought-out design that makes dismantling it very easy. So out it comes to be laid bare for Hackaday.

Once the sides have come off the camera, immediately you can see a set of very early-70s-analogue PCBs containing the light metering circuitry. Typically this would involve a CdS cell and a simple transistor circuit, and the aperture is controlled via a moving coil meter mechanism. This camera also has a large mostly-unpopulated PCB, giving a clue to some of the higher-end features found on its more expensive sibling.

Turning our attention inside the camera to the film gate, we can see the casting the film cartridge engages with, and the frame opening for the shutter To the left of that opening is a metal claw that engages with the sprocket holes in the film, thus providing the primary film advancement. The metal claw is attached to a slider on the back of the film gate, which in turn is operated by the rotation of the shutter, which is the next object of our attention.

The shutter is a disc that spins at the frame rate, in this case 18 frames per second. It sits in the light path between the back of the lens system and the film gate. It has a segment cut out of the disc to let light through for part of the rotation, this is how it operates as a shutter. On its reverse is the cam which operates the slider for the film advancement claw, while its front is mirrored. This forms part of the through-the-lens light metering system which we’ll come to next.

The mirror on the front of the shutter is angled, which means that when the shutter is closed, the light is instead reflected upwards at right angles into a prism, which in turn directs the light to the light meter cell. The PCB on the other side must have a charge pump which takes this 18 Hz interrupted analogue signal and turns it into a DC to drive the moving coil mechanism. There’s a 10 uF capacitor which may be part of this circuit.

Finally, we come to the powered zoom feature that was missing from the previous camera. On the top of the camera is a W/T rocker, for Wide/Telephoto. that operates the zoom. It is connected to a set of levers inside the case, which emerge as a pin at the front of the camera below the lens. This engages with a small gearbox that drives a knurled ring on the lens body, and selects forward and reverse to turn the ring. It’s driven by the same motor as the shutter, so it only works when the camera is operating.

I hope this look at my Minolta has filled in some of the gaps left by the previous article, and maybe revealed that there’s more than meets the eye when it comes to 8 mm movies. Careful though. If you dip a toe into this particular puddle it may suck you in head first!

Using digital techniques has caused a resurgence of interest in VLF — very low frequency — radio. Thanks to software-defined radio, you no longer need huge coils. However, you still need a suitable antenna. [Electronics Unmessed] has been experimenting and asks the question: What really matters when it comes to VLF loops? The answer he found is in the video below.

This isn’t the first video about the topic he’s made, but it covers new ground about what changes make the most impact on received signals. You can see via graphs how everything changes performance. There are several parameters varied, including different types of ferrite, various numbers of loops in the antenna, and wire diameter. Don’t miss the comment section, either, where some viewers have suggested other parameters that might warrant experimentation.

Don’t miss the 9-foot square antenna loop in the video. We’d like to see it suspended in the air. Probably not a good way to ingratiate yourself with your neighbors, though.

Between software-defined radio and robust computer simulation, there’s never been a better time to experiment with antennas and radios. We first saw these antennas in an earlier post. VLF sure is easier than it used to be.

youtube.com/embed/S7nQ2fnaA3Y?…

hackaday.com/2025/09/04/optimi…

Developing Android applications seems like it should be fairly straightforward if you believe the glossy marketing by Google and others. It’s certainly possible to just follow the well-trodden path, use existing templates and example code – or even use one of those WYSIWYG app generators – to create something passable that should work okay for a range of common applications. That’s a far cry from learning general Android development, of course.

The process has changed somewhat over the years, especially with the big move from the Eclipse-based IDE with the Android Development Tools (ADT) plugin, to today’s Jetbrains IntelliJ IDEA-based Android Studio. It’s fortunately still possible to download just the command-line tools to obtain the SDK components without needing the Google-blessed IDE. Using the CLI tools it’s not only possible to use your preferred code editor, but also integrate with IDEs that provide an alternate Android development path, such as Qt with its Qt Creator IDE.

Picking Poison

Both Qt Creator and ADT/Android Studio offer a WYSIWYG experience for GUI design, though the former’s design tools are incomparably better. Much of this appears to be due to how Qt Creator’s GUI design tools follow the standard desktop GUI paradigms, with standard elements and constraint patterns. After over a decade of having wrangled the – also XML-based – UI files and WYSIWYG design tools in ADT/Android Studio, it never ceases to amaze how simple things like placing UI elements and adding constraints love to explode on you.

The intuitive Android Studio WYSIWYG experience.

Somewhat recently the original Android API layouts also got ditched in favor of the ‘refactored’ AndroidX API layouts, with apparently now this Jetpack Compose being the (high-level) way to use. Over the years of me having developed for Android, many APIs and tools have been introduced, deprecated and removed at an increasingly rapid pace, to the point where having Android Studio or the CLI tools not freak out when confronted with a one year old project is a pleasant surprise.

Designing GUIs in Qt Creator’s Designer mode.

Although Qt isn’t the only alternative to the Android Studio experience, it serves to highlight the major differences encountered when approaching Android development. In fact, Qt for Android offers a few options, including building a desktop Qt application for Android, which can also use the Qt Quick elements, or including Qt Quick within your existing Android application. For Qt Quick you want to either create the UIs by hand, or using Qt Quick Designer, though I have so far mostly just stuck to using Qt Creator and liberally applied stylesheets to make the UI fit the target Android UI.

Whichever way you choose, it’s important to know your requirements and take some time to work through a few test projects before investing a lot of time in a single approach.

The Build System

No matter what approach you choose, the build system for Android is based on what is objectively one of the worst build automation tools conceivable, in the form of Gradle. Not only does it take ages to even start doing anything, it’s also agonizingly slow, insists on repeating tasks that should already have been completed previously, provides few ways to interact or get more information without getting absolutely swamped in useless verbosity, and loves to fail silently if you get just the wrong Gradle version installed in your Android project.

Did I mention yet that the entire Gradle tool is a permanent fixture of your Android project? Android Studio will want to upgrade it almost every time you open the project, and if you don’t use an IDE like it which automates Gradle upgrades, you better learn how to do it manually. Don’t forget to install the right Java Development Kit (JDK) either, or Android Studio, Gradle or both will get very upset.

If your IDE doesn’t pave over many of these inane issues, then getting familiar with the Gradle wrapper CLI commands is right on the top of your list, as you will need them. Fortunately sticking to an IDE here tends to avoid the biggest pitfalls, except for having enough time with each build session to fetch a coffee and go on a brisk walk before returning to address the next build failure.

There are no real solutions here, just a call for perseverance and documenting solutions that worked previously, because you will always encounter the same errors again some day.

Test, Debug And Deploy

Creating a new virtual Android device.

Even if you have built that shiny APK or app bundle, there’s a very high likelihood that there will be issues while running it. Fortunately the one advantage of JVM-based environments is that you get blasted with details when something violently explodes. Of course, that is unless someone screwed up exception handling in the code and your backtrace explodes somewhere in thin air instead. For the same reason using a debugger is pretty easy too, especially if you are using an IDE like Android Studio or Qt Creator that provides easy debugger access.

Logging in Android tends to be rather verbose, with the LogCat functionality providing you with a veritable flood of logging messages, most of which you want to filter out. Using the filter function of your IDE of choice is basically essential here. Usually when I do Android application debugging, I am either already running Qt Creator where I can start up a debug session, or I can fire up Android Studio and do the same here as at its core it’s the same Gradle-based project.

The NymphCast Player Android build, with default skin.

Of course, in order to have something catch on fire you first need to run the application, which is where you get two options: run on real hardware or use an emulator. Real hardware is easier in some ways, as unlike an emulated Android Virtual Device (AVD) your application can directly access the network and internet, whereas an AVD instance requires you to wrangle with network redirects each session.

On the other hand, using an AVD can be handy as it allows you to create devices with a wide range of screen resolutions, so it can be quite nifty to test applications that do not require you to connect to externally via the network. If you want to know for example how well your UI scales across screen sizes, and how it looks on something like a tablet, then using an AVD is a pretty good option.

Some hardware devices are also quite annoyingly locked-down, such as Xiaomi phones that at least for a while have refused to allow you to toggle on remote debugging via USB unless you install a SIM card. Fortunately this could be circumvented by clicking through an alternate path that the Xiaomi developers had not locked down, but these are just some of the obnoxious hurdles that you may encounter with real hardware.

With that out of the way, deploying to an AVD or real device is basically the same, either by using the ‘Start’ or similar function in your IDE of choice with the target device selected, or by doing so via the command-line, either with ADB, or via the Gradle wrapper with ./gradlew InstallDebug or equivalent.

This will of course be a debug build, with creating a release build also being an option, but this will not be signed by default. Signing an APK requires a whole other procedure, and is honestly something that’s best done via the friendly-ish dialogs in an IDE, rather than by burning a lot of time and sanity on the command-line. Whether you want to sign the APK or app bundle depends mostly on your needs/wants and what a potential app store demands.

Ever since Google began to demand that all developers – including Open Source hobbyists – send in a scan of their government ID and full address, I have resorted to just distributing the Android builds of my NymphCast player and server via GitHub, from where they can be sideloaded.

This NymphCast server is incidentally the topic of the next installment in this mini-series, in which we will be doing a deep dive into native Android development using the NDK.

hackaday.com/2025/09/04/bootst…

Editoria scolastica: pubblicato il rapporto preliminare dell’Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato

L’Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato ha reso nota nel bollettino 30/2025 del 04/08/2025 la pubblicazione di un due provvedimenti sull’editoria scolastica e di un interessante allegato al provvedimento, recante il rapporto preliminare sull’editoria scolastica che analizza in profondità le dinamiche economiche e strutturali del settore.

Il termine per la conclusione del procedimento è stato prorogato al 31 dicembre 2025.

L’indagine nasce esattamente un anno fa dalla necessità di comprendere meglio come vengono adottati, distribuiti e utilizzati i libri di testo nelle scuole italiane, con particolare attenzione ai costi sostenuti dalle famiglie e all’effettiva transizione verso il digitale.

Il mercato dell’editoria scolastica in Italia ha un valore stimato di circa 800 milioni di euro, con pochi grandi gruppi editoriali che dominano l’offerta. Nonostante la crescente disponibilità di contenuti digitali, la modalità più diffusa resta quella mista, che combina il libro cartaceo con contenuti online. Tuttavia, l’utilizzo effettivo delle risorse digitali è ancora molto limitato: solo una piccola percentuale delle licenze viene attivata e gli accessi alle piattaforme sono sporadici. Questo evidenzia una transizione digitale incompleta, ostacolata da carenze infrastrutturali, scarsa formazione del personale docente e da sistemi chiusi che limitano la condivisione e la flessibilità.

Il rapporto sottolinea anche le forti disparità territoriali e sociali. I libri sono gratuiti solo nella scuola primaria, mentre nelle secondarie le spese ricadono interamente sulle famiglie, con costi che possono superare i mille euro l’anno per studente. I tetti di spesa imposti dal Ministero risultano spesso inefficaci e facilmente aggirati, aggravando il peso economico soprattutto nelle regioni del Sud.

Un altro punto critico riguarda il mercato dell’usato, che rappresenta una risorsa importante per molte famiglie ma che viene ostacolato dalle politiche editoriali, in particolare per quanto riguarda i contenuti digitali, che non possono essere riutilizzati o ceduti. Inoltre, il rapporto evidenzia come le risorse educative aperte (OER) e le autoproduzioni didattiche siano ancora marginali, frenate da vincoli normativi e dalla mancanza di incentivi.

In conclusione, l’AGCM invita a ripensare il modello editoriale scolastico, promuovendo maggiore interoperabilità tra piattaforme, incentivando la produzione di contenuti aperti e sostenendo economicamente le famiglie e le scuole. L’obiettivo è rendere l’istruzione più accessibile, equa e al passo con le trasformazioni digitali.

Qui:

• il testo con i due provvedimenti sull’editoria scolastica (pagine 66 e 69)
• l'allegato al provvedimento, con il rapporto preliminare sull’editoria scolastica

@Scuola - Gruppo Forum

“Le parole del Presidente UEFA Ceferin sui motivi per cui Israele non viene esclusa dalle competizioni internazionali confermano quello che già sapevamo: su Gaza e il genocidio messo in atto da Israele i potenti del mondo sono muti.”

Lo dichiara la Segretaria Nazionale di Possibile Francesca Druetti, che insieme ad Andrea di Lenardo ha lanciato nelle scorse settimane una petizione, Stop The Game, che chiede che Italia-Israele (in programma il 14 ottobre a Udine) non si giochi e che ha raggiunto più di 20.000 firme. La petizione può essere firmata su www.possibile.com/unafirmaper.

“Ceferin — continua Druetti — sostiene che la Russia sia stata esclusa dalle competizioni internazionali per una forte pressione politica, mentre con Israele non sta avvenendo la stessa cosa, c’è solo una pressione della società civile. È una dichiarazione pavida, perché la UEFA potrebbe decidere in autonomia di sospendere almeno le squadre di club israeliane dalle sue competizioni, ma è una dichiarazione che descrive perfettamente i motivi per cui le bombe su scuole e ospedali, la carestia imposta alla popolazione palestinese, l’occupazione del territorio palestinese proseguono indisturbati da tanto tempo.”

“Con Possibile — conclude Druetti — siamo al fianco della società civile che continua a insistere perché Israele venga escluso dai Mondiali di Calcio e dalle altre competizioni. Continuiamo a insistere perché la Federazione Italiana Gioco Calcio raccolga l’appello di Renzo Ulivieri e della Associazione Italiana Allenatori Calcio, perché vengano ascoltate le decine di migliaia di persone che hanno firmato la nostra petizione. Di fronte a questo sta accadendo, c’è bisogno di una presa di posizione forte da parte di tutti i mondi, compreso quello dello sport.”

L'articolo Druetti: su Gaza e Israele i potenti sono muti, parole di Ceferin confermano quanto sapevamo proviene da Possibile.

Sosteniamo il digiuno di dialogo portato avanti da Rita Bernardini e la proposta di legge di iniziativa popolare Zuncheddu

L’Assciazione Luca Coscioni ha nuovamente ricevuto segnalazioni da parte di detenuti nel carcere Badu ‘e Carros di Nuoro. Se le precedenti missive avevano messo in luce con chiarezza le carenze strutturali, sanitarie e logistiche della casa circondariale di Nuoro, quanto segnalato a distanza di un mese documenterebbe che nulla di significativo è stato fatto per porre rimedio a tali condizioni di degrado e illegalità.

Alle già note criticità, in questa seconda comunicazione si aggiungono lamentele relative in particolare alle operazioni di spedizione della corrispondenza condotte secondo una prassi che appare non del tutto trasparente. Uno dei firmatari scrive che “tutte le lettere indirizzate alla vostra associazione (Luca Coscioni ndr), vengono bloccate per impedirci di comunicare con voi […] un abuso” per cui si è reso necessario l’intervento dell’Ufficio Comando – così come si viene informati da un altro recluso.

Un ulteriore aspetto allarmante è rappresentato dalle difficoltà nell’usufruire di colloqui familiari senza controllo a vista. Se confermato si tratterebbe della violazione di una libertà su cui la Corte Costituzionale si è espressa con la sentenza 10/24 che ha rimarcato il dovere di garantire alle persone recluse l’adeguato diritto all’affettività.

“Molti detenuti hanno fatto richiesta ma, come al solito, non c’è alcuna risposta” si legge nella lettera che conferma le difficoltà nelle relazioni tra operatori e popolazione detenuta che, insieme alle criticità evidenziate in passato acuiscono un clima di malessere che grava anche sull’operato degli agenti di sorveglianza, in alcuni casi vittime di episodi di violenza.

“Ci dicono sempre che la situazione migliorerà, ma anziché migliorare peggiora ogni giorno di più“, conclude una delle ultime lettere giunte all’attenzione dell’associazione.

L’Associazione Luca Coscioni torna a sollecitare le autorità sanitarie locali a effettuare nuovi sopralluoghi a Badu ‘e Carros, dedicando particolare attenzione a quanto denunciato nelle lettere ricevute, annunciando ulteriori azioni affinché negli istituti di pena non si ripetano violazioni dei diritti fondamentali, a partire da quello alla salute e all’affettività delle persone ristrette.

Nel sostenere il digiuno di dialogo con le forze politiche in Senato che Rita Bernardini, presidente di Nessuno Tocchi Caino, sta portando avanti da tre settimane, l’Assocazione sostiene anche la raccolta firme, anche online, per la proposta di legge d’iniziativa popolare Proposta di legge Zuncheddu, lanciata dal Partito Radicale, che prevede un risarcimento rapido e proporzionato per tutte le persone vittime di detenzione senza giusta causa.

L'articolo Carceri Sardegna: a Badu ‘e Carros di Nuoro censurate le lettere dei detenuti che denunciano situazioni illegali proviene da Associazione Luca Coscioni.